September 23, 2023

Todays American Patriot Citizen Same As Todays American Wolf Pimps

March 26, 2018 by Leave a Comment
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Today’s American patriot citizen defends his opinions by placing his FBp back to private from public.. Because he cannot defend his big mouth. He is non compos mentis. Which is what these paper patriots get called out on multiple times over the years before they crawl into their holes. No comprehensive legal case argument or opinion supported by court case rebuttal just run for cover. That’s the problem. The distractions all around us are so most of us will never figure this out, team up and put together a lawful sane comprehensive argument against this fraud that has been placed over us all.. Any other form of appealing to the system as stated in their own codes/laws/legalese is never going to do anything except cause them to keep baring down on incompetent people, like today’s American patriot citizen…
Like the U.S. code states, all considered insane by the very code they think they know so much about. All constitutionally necessary and proper according to the COTUS. Remember when we were disgusted with the wolf pimps because they hide, run for cover, will not stand and defend their indefensible lies? That my friends is the actions of cowards. PERIOD.. If you cannot stand in the storm and howling wind and face the thunder in defense of your core beliefs you can never stand in defense of anything.. You might as well put on a skirt.. The people behind the curtain have nothing to fear from you modern days American Patriot Citizen who avoid discussion of the legal facts of this nation state.. pseudo constitutionalists are non compos mentis.. The code is the code and it is deemed constitutionally necessary and proper.. If you’re our defense for our hunting heritage we’re in deep shit…
  • ~ To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
What is “necessary and proper”? Anything they want it to mean. There is no such thing as an unconstitutional U.S. Code, Law, Act because if it got passed it had to be “necessary and proper”.

U.S. Code For Legally Incompetent Constitutionalists Check mated by that Code is the code…

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/1

1 U.S. Code § 1 – Words denoting number, gender, and so forth

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/1

In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless the context indicates otherwise—

words importing the singular include and apply to several persons, parties, or things;

words importing the plural include the singular;

words importing the masculine gender include the feminine as well;

words used in the present tense include the future as well as the present;

the words “insane” and “insane person” shall include every idiot, insane person, and person non compos mentis;

the words “person” and “whoever” include corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals;

“officer” includes any person authorized by law to perform the duties of the office;

“signature” or “subscription” includes a mark when the person making the same intended it as such;

“oath” includes affirmation, and “sworn” includes affirmed;

“writing” includes printing and typewriting and reproductions of visual symbols by photographing, multigraphing, mimeographing, manifolding, or otherwise.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 633; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §?6, 62 Stat. 859; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §?1, 65 Stat. 710; Pub. L. 112–231, §?2(a), Dec. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1619.)
Cannot stand and make a comprehensible defensible argument in defense of his legal opinion based upon the current definitions of establishment legalese cases.. thus is non compos mentis.. Has never tested his opinion in the courts – non compos mentis… Advises his followers incorrectly thus leading them into non compos mentis…Requires another who is competent in legal matters to defend him in legal matters – non compos mentis..
See ya around discussion dodger…If and when you come out of your echo chamber..
Share
Filed Under: history, Legal/historical, National/World, Politics in General