October 23, 2020

And STILL You Think the CONstitution is for YOU

The below information was sent to me in an email. Most of it is true (but much of it is not true in the way you have been trained to believe). What props up the claim that the world has gone insane is that perhaps millions of Americans will read this, see it as true, and then everything remains exactly the same as it was before it was read. Why? Because the CONstitution is was perpetuates a Rigged System. How many times must it be said that you cannot change a rigged system by operating with a Rigged System. Yes, that’s insanity!

Of the perhaps millions of people who would read this (it’s more than 141 characters so the overwhelming majority of people won’t take the time to read it, say nothing about comprehending the bigger meaning and learning anything from it.) and agree with it, or find truth in it, will then turn around and continue to repeat the lies they have been programmed to rinse and repeat…that the United States Constitution was and is written for them. They actually think “We the People” is referring to themselves and yet if they agree with what is written below, how can it be?

How many Americans died because they believed they were defending the United States Constitution as though it was a document intended to keep them free? And yet, read on and nod your head. Agree to all the disgusting atrocities these 545 assholes have foisted onto innocent people, people that the same assholes have for over a century brainwashed into believing this crap sandwich that they are looking our for you because you are part of “We the People.”

We are incapable of learning anymore. We are clinically insane…made that way on purpose. And you prove your own insanity because you will think I’m nuts.

545 vs. 300,000,000 People  -By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits? Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes? You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The President does. You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does. You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does. You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does. One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country. I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank. I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes. Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party. What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House now ?  She and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to. It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist. If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red. If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it’s because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan … If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way. There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do. Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible. They, and they alone, have the power. They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees… We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!  
What you do with this article now that you have read it… is up to you.
This might be funny if it weren’t so true.
Be sure to read all the way to the end: Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table,
At which he’s fed. Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule. Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for
peanuts anyway! Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat. Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt. Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think. Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears. Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass. Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won’t be done
Till he has no dough. When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He’s good and sore. Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he’s laid… Put these words
Upon his tomb,
‘Taxes drove me
to my doom…’ When he’s gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax. Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Sales Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax 
STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom
, if agreed, stayed home to raise the kids.What in the heck happened? Can you spell ‘politicians?’

Share

Global Warming: Having it Both Ways

Here we go again. Another “report” that places value (perceived) on “nature” and wants the world to set aside a minimum of 30% of its lands and waters for “conservation” to protect nature…because it is economically profitable. Really? Oh, I see. Let’s try that con job for awhile.

Oddly, and to anyone with half a brain, the idiotic double standards and hypocrisy take front and center. These mental midgets, heavily deceived, want to cut carbon dioxide because they believe it causes global warming. If these morons had their way, they would rid the world of carbon dioxide.

History and actual science proves that in times of increased carbon dioxide (a guess) that caused global warming, everything grew very well creating massive agricultural benefits, forest growth (habitat), food growth, for both man and animal, and poverty eased a bit. This was and is the best “protection” of nature.

Morons, claiming that protecting land and waters will accomplish more than global warming, are seeking to reduce global warming, thus removing the carbon dioxide levels necessary to actually protect and prosper our forests and fields. This is akin to urinating into a stiff breeze, I’d say.

The end result might just be the protection of more areas of wasteland incapable of growing even weeds.

What’s this locking up the land really all about? It that where they grow coronaviruses?

Share

Sometimes Silence is a Good Thing

Perhaps readers have been wondering what happened to me that I am not posting much of anything. Well, the short explanation is that I really don’t have a lot to say…or the Holy Spirit is having me keep my mouth shut.

What is going on presently with these protests and violent uprisings (seemingly putting the kibosh to COVID-19), I know little about, and where I care about the lives of people, especially those who end up in Hell, I have little interest in all the insanity. Insanity! That’s what it is. I’ve been saying for a few years now that the world has gone mad. Can you see it? I pray that you can. I also pray you are doing something about it. I know some of you are.

At this point, nothing I can say can add anything worthwhile and so I will remain relatively quiet.

I have realized that unless the LORD GOD shows me something different, I am not sure how long true converted, born agains will have to endure the Great Tribulation. With that in mind, I am spending most of my time readying where I am living in preparation for tough times ahead. They are coming.

God bless you and if you are looking for my advice, I suggest you get away from social media as much as possible and instead of reading the words of Facebook, Twitter, and all the rest, open up your Bibles and read the Word of God. It’s the ONLY truth and you can find all THE answers there. Nothing else will do. Ask the Holy Spirit to guide you. You’ll never regret it.

Under guidance of the Holy Spirit, I will post again.

Share

Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship

SMOKE AND MIRRORS – Q Followers Think This is a Big Deal

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Policy.Free speech is the bedrock of American democracy.  Our Founding Fathers protected this sacred right with the First Amendment to the Constitution.  The freedom to express and debate ideas is the foundation for all of our rights as a free people.

In a country that has long cherished the freedom of expression, we cannot allow a limited number of online platforms to hand pick the speech that Americans may access and convey on the internet.  This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic.  When large, powerful social media companies censor opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous power.  They cease functioning as passive bulletin boards, and ought to be viewed and treated as content creators.

The growth of online platforms in recent years raises important questions about applying the ideals of the First Amendment to modern communications technology.  Today, many Americans follow the news, stay in touch with friends and family, and share their views on current events through social media and other online platforms.  As a result, these platforms function in many ways as a 21st century equivalent of the public square.

Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube wield immense, if not unprecedented, power to shape the interpretation of public events; to censor, delete, or disappear information; and to control what people see or do not see.

As President, I have made clear my commitment to free and open debate on the internet. Such debate is just as important online as it is in our universities, our town halls, and our homes.  It is essential to sustaining our democracy.

Online platforms are engaging in selective censorship that is harming our national discourse.  Tens of thousands of Americans have reported, among other troubling behaviors, online platforms “flagging” content as inappropriate, even though it does not violate any stated terms of service; making unannounced and unexplained changes to company policies that have the effect of disfavoring certain viewpoints; and deleting content and entire accounts with no warning, no rationale, and no recourse.

Twitter now selectively decides to place a warning label on certain tweets in a manner that clearly reflects political bias.  As has been reported, Twitter seems never to have placed such a label on another politician’s tweet.  As recently as last week, Representative Adam Schiff was continuing to mislead his followers by peddling the long-disproved Russian Collusion Hoax, and Twitter did not flag those tweets.  Unsurprisingly, its officer in charge of so-called ‘Site Integrity’ has flaunted his political bias in his own tweets.

At the same time online platforms are invoking inconsistent, irrational, and groundless justifications to censor or otherwise restrict Americans’ speech here at home, several online platforms are profiting from and promoting the aggression and disinformation spread by foreign governments like China.  One United States company, for example, created a search engine for the Chinese Communist Party that would have blacklisted searches for “human rights,” hid data unfavorable to the Chinese Communist Party, and tracked users determined appropriate for surveillance.  It also established research partnerships in China that provide direct benefits to the Chinese military.  Other companies have accepted advertisements paid for by the Chinese government that spread false information about China’s mass imprisonment of religious minorities, thereby enabling these abuses of human rights.  They have also amplified China’s propaganda abroad, including by allowing Chinese government officials to use their platforms to spread misinformation regarding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to undermine pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.

As a Nation, we must foster and protect diverse viewpoints in today’s digital communications environment where all Americans can and should have a voice.  We must seek transparency and accountability from online platforms, and encourage standards and tools to protect and preserve the integrity and openness of American discourse and freedom of expression.

Sec. 2.  Protections Against Online Censorship.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States to foster clear ground rules promoting free and open debate on the internet.  Prominent among the ground rules governing that debate is the immunity from liability created by section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act (section 230(c)).  47 U.S.C. 230(c).  It is the policy of the United States that the scope of that immunity should be clarified: the immunity should not extend beyond its text and purpose to provide protection for those who purport to provide users a forum for free and open speech, but in reality use their power over a vital means of communication to engage in deceptive or pretextual actions stifling free and open debate by censoring certain viewpoints.

Section 230(c) was designed to address early court decisions holding that, if an online platform restricted access to some content posted by others, it would thereby become a “publisher” of all the content posted on its site for purposes of torts such as defamation.  As the title of section 230(c) makes clear, the provision provides limited liability “protection” to a provider of an interactive computer service (such as an online platform) that engages in “‘Good Samaritan’ blocking” of harmful content.  In particular, the Congress sought to provide protections for online platforms that attempted to protect minors from harmful content and intended to ensure that such providers would not be discouraged from taking down harmful material.  The provision was also intended to further the express vision of the Congress that the internet is a “forum for a true diversity of political discourse.”  47 U.S.C. 230(a)(3).  The limited protections provided by the statute should be construed with these purposes in mind.

In particular, subparagraph (c)(2) expressly addresses protections from “civil liability” and specifies that an interactive computer service provider may not be made liable “on account of” its decision in “good faith” to restrict access to content that it considers to be “obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing or otherwise objectionable.”  It is the policy of the United States to ensure that, to the maximum extent permissible under the law, this provision is not distorted to provide liability protection for online platforms that — far from acting in “good faith” to remove objectionable content — instead engage in deceptive or pretextual actions (often contrary to their stated terms of service) to stifle viewpoints with which they disagree.  Section 230 was not intended to allow a handful of companies to grow into titans controlling vital avenues for our national discourse under the guise of promoting open forums for debate, and then to provide those behemoths blanket immunity when they use their power to censor content and silence viewpoints that they dislike.  When an interactive computer service provider removes or restricts access to content and its actions do not meet the criteria of subparagraph (c)(2)(A), it is engaged in editorial conduct.  It is the policy of the United States that such a provider should properly lose the limited liability shield of subparagraph (c)(2)(A) and be exposed to liability like any traditional editor and publisher that is not an online provider.

(b)  To advance the policy described in subsection (a) of this section, all executive departments and agencies should ensure that their application of section 230(c) properly reflects the narrow purpose of the section and take all appropriate actions in this regard.  In addition, within 60 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), in consultation with the Attorney General, and acting through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), shall file a petition for rulemaking with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requesting that the FCC expeditiously propose regulations to clarify:

(i) the interaction between subparagraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of section 230, in particular to clarify and determine the circumstances under which a provider of an interactive computer service that restricts access to content in a manner not specifically protected by subparagraph (c)(2)(A) may also not be able to claim protection under subparagraph (c)(1), which merely states that a provider shall not be treated as a publisher or speaker for making third-party content available and does not address the provider’s responsibility for its own editorial decisions;

(ii)  the conditions under which an action restricting access to or availability of material is not “taken in good faith” within the meaning of subparagraph (c)(2)(A) of section 230, particularly whether actions can be “taken in good faith” if they are:

(A)  deceptive, pretextual, or inconsistent with a provider’s terms of service; or

(B)  taken after failing to provide adequate notice, reasoned explanation, or a meaningful opportunity to be heard; and

(iii)  any other proposed regulations that the NTIA concludes may be appropriate to advance the policy described in subsection (a) of this section.

Sec. 3.  Protecting Federal Taxpayer Dollars from Financing Online Platforms That Restrict Free Speech.  (a)  The head of each executive department and agency (agency) shall review its agency’s Federal spending on advertising and marketing paid to online platforms.  Such review shall include the amount of money spent, the online platforms that receive Federal dollars, and the statutory authorities available to restrict their receipt of advertising dollars.

(b)  Within 30 days of the date of this order, the head of each agency shall report its findings to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

(c)  The Department of Justice shall review the viewpoint-based speech restrictions imposed by each online platform identified in the report described in subsection (b) of this section and assess whether any online platforms are problematic vehicles for government speech due to viewpoint discrimination, deception to consumers, or other bad practices.

Sec. 4.  Federal Review of Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States that large online platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, as the critical means of promoting the free flow of speech and ideas today, should not restrict protected speech.  The Supreme Court has noted that social media sites, as the modern public square, “can provide perhaps the most powerful mechanisms available to a private citizen to make his or her voice heard.”  Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct. 1730, 1737 (2017).  Communication through these channels has become important for meaningful participation in American democracy, including to petition elected leaders.  These sites are providing an important forum to the public for others to engage in free expression and debate.  CfPruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 85-89 (1980).

(b)  In May of 2019, the White House launched a Tech Bias Reporting tool to allow Americans to report incidents of online censorship.  In just weeks, the White House received over 16,000 complaints of online platforms censoring or otherwise taking action against users based on their political viewpoints.  The White House will submit such complaints received to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

(c)  The FTC shall consider taking action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, pursuant to section 45 of title 15, United States Code.  Such unfair or deceptive acts or practice may include practices by entities covered by section 230 that restrict speech in ways that do not align with those entities’ public representations about those practices.

(d)  For large online platforms that are vast arenas for public debate, including the social media platform Twitter, the FTC shall also, consistent with its legal authority, consider whether complaints allege violations of law that implicate the policies set forth in section 4(a) of this order.  The FTC shall consider developing a report describing such complaints and making the report publicly available, consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 5.  State Review of Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices and Anti-Discrimination Laws.  (a)  The Attorney General shall establish a working group regarding the potential enforcement of State statutes that prohibit online platforms from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices.  The working group shall also develop model legislation for consideration by legislatures in States where existing statutes do not protect Americans from such unfair and deceptive acts and practices. The working group shall invite State Attorneys General for discussion and consultation, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law.

(b) Complaints described in section 4(b) of this order will be shared with the working group, consistent with applicable law. The working group shall also collect publicly available information regarding the following:

(i) increased scrutiny of users based on the other users they choose to follow, or their interactions with other users;

(ii) algorithms to suppress content or users based on indications of political alignment or viewpoint;

(iii) differential policies allowing for otherwise impermissible behavior, when committed by accounts associated with the Chinese Communist Party or other anti-democratic associations or governments;

(iv) reliance on third-party entities, including contractors, media organizations, and individuals, with indicia of bias to review content; and

(v) acts that limit the ability of users with particular viewpoints to earn money on the platform compared with other users similarly situated.

Sec. 6.  Legislation.  The Attorney General shall develop a proposal for Federal legislation that would be useful to promote the policy objectives of this order.

Sec. 7.  Definition.  For purposes of this order, the term “online platform” means any website or application that allows users to create and share content or engage in social networking, or any general search engine.

Sec. 8.  General Provisions. (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)    the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)   the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Share

Operation COVID-19: Guidelines Through Stupidity? Or All Part of Planned Event?

Because there are still a handful of people who can actually do a bit of thinking on their own, what is pissing the public off more than the fact that they can’t see a need to lock up the whole country because of some virus, is what some people think are “laws” that are inconsistent, arbitrary, contrary, foolishness, and just plain don’t make any sense at all. Can we blame people for getting pissed off? How are THEY going to stop the violence?

I’ve heard on more than one occasion in discussions about COVID-19 is that people are saying they feel like they are being screwed over. Perhaps not the most eloquent of verbal frustrations, but an expression of frustration to say the least.

Evidently it’s not just the servitude, the slave nation, that is experiencing frustrations because of this foolishness. According to an Online publication, an Illinois judge, ruling on a lawsuit against someone who just wants to open their business and eat and pay their bills, basically said in regards to these so-called “laws” governing who can go where, when, and how, these, “… rules, regulations and consequences that are arbitrary, capricious, and completely devoid of anything even remotely approaching common sense.”

It appears at least some, perhaps all, of what is found in the link provided is true. I didn’t spend hours of time vetting this but did find many examples and smaller quotes from the mainstream presses. But it really doesn’t matter if this judge said this in regards to this one case before his court. The fact is, all of his examples cited, are true in many places all over this country, and that is what is frustrating thinking people and those who place value on rule of law and the consistency in interpreting laws and passing judgements on cases.

We can argue until we are blue in the face as to whether or not any government within this nation has the legal authority, granted to them by declarations of national emergencies, etc., but it doesn’t really matter. Governors, mayors, business owners, right on up to the U.S. Congress and the President of the United States, are handing down, what they call “laws” essentially treading all over any leftover “rights” in this land turned totalitarian and socialistic.

While many are arguing this point, absolute insanity is running the shows. The examples cited by Judge McHaney are classic examples that reveal the insanity behind stupid and unreasonable, tyrannical “bulls” that ignorant people are accepting as the new laws of the land.

McHaney cites absurdities like, you can’t get COVID from an abortion but you can from a colonoscopy; Selling pot is an “essential” business; you can cram six people in your car and go for a ride, but the same people can’t get in a boat. There are many more examples given.

And it’s true no matter where you go. We have turned to quarantining healthy people and letting prisoners out of jail while locking up people who don’t comply and assimilate into the new normal of arbitrary and capricious rulings.

Even the government’s idiots advising the president, as well as the CDC and WHO, have been all over the board, appearing to make shit up as they go along. Truth is, they haven’t figure out yet how the virus is spread or what the symptoms of having this disease are. All the while demanding stupid stuff that they have convinced the automatons are necessary to do if they want to live.

The longer this lockdown continues, and the longer mask wearing, and self-quarantining goes on, with all the evidence of completely asinine “guidelines” that, as Judge McHaney says doesn’t even “remotely approach common sense,” the angrier the natives are going to get.

This has gotten so bad and on the verge of something that will have nothing but a very bad outcome, with an incompetent, criminal government (at all levels) offering no help, one has to wonder if this is all part of the plan by these evil bastards that began with the release of a flu virus?

Share

Operation COVID-19: The Complete Works of Censorship and Mind Control

We have now progressed in this fascist and totalitarian society to a point where, not only are Media platforms and organizations deliberately and boastfully “scrubbing” or censoring anything deemed contrary information to the official talking points of the fascists, but a majority of the public applaud the move, I suppose believing it is for their own good.

This kind of public ignorance reminds me (true story but no names) of the person who was scared to drive down a certain street that was heavily occupied with foot traffic from Scientologists thinking that someone being near that many of them might cause them to become a victim of their brainwashing.

Regardless, any fascist government or organization, cannot tolerate opposing thoughts and especially facts that contradict the official talking points, also know as propaganda. Because of this, all efforts must be made to squelch any and all opposition. This is necessary because the fascists’ “truth” can never be supported with real truth.

There once was a time in this country (United States) that no one dared to deliberately censor someone. The right to free speech was actually considered a valuable thing. Free speech and the consequences of free speech become a very powerful instrument when all thoughts and ideas are discussed, and then the effort of those concerned and who care, worked through all the ideas and reached their own conclusions based on presented evidence – actual learning.

This is past history and something that can never be used again due to the manipulation of minds and modern technology. Few people, anymore, look for information and facts beyond what they can glean from a 141-character text message. Pathetic when you consider the dangers and the results.

Because free speech was mostly protected and considered a valuable social construct, control over thoughts and ideas had to come from surreptitious actions, such as the Central Intelligence Agency’s effort to actively label any ideas that do not fully support the agenda at hand as a conspiracy theory.

Just because this progressive, totalitarian society of automatons now seem to endorse censorship for their own protection from a boogyman, THEY can’t simply rely on censorship to accomplish THEIR tasks. And so, attacking all contrary thoughts and ideas to, say, the official talking points on COVID-19, remains in the toolbox of instruments to dismantle any and all resistance.

It is my opinion that Operation COVID-19 is so loaded down with nonsensical regulations and guidelines, many contrary to everything we have learned throughout medical history, that what is going on is far more than addressing a government-declared “pandemic.”

Not all contrary thoughts are found on Facebook, Youtube, etc. where the fascist censors, with the support of the corrupt government, deliberately remove any information they deem unsupportive of the official propaganda of the Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organization…or at least that is the excuse that is being used.

It therefore becomes necessary to rely on the good, proven, and trusty efforts of calling out the oppositions’ information and labelling it a conspiracy theory.

Here’s an example. In the Atlantic Online, a writer not only takes the time to attack one specific Youtube video, of course, labeling it a conspiracy theory and all those that believe the content of the video as conspiracists, he actually takes the time to instruct the brainwashed masses, that is, those who are frightened of opposing information, like the person who feared brainwashing from the Scientologists simply because they exists, on how to deal with such conspiracy theories and also how to respond to anyone who tries to talk to you about those conspiracy theories.

In the article, I think we are left with a couple different ideas about what is going on. First, is the author of this piece fully cognizant of the CIA’s program of censorship through tagging information a conspiracy theory or demonizing the person who is the messenger? Or, second, is the author so ignorant, that in his accusations, he’s incapable of comprehending his own hypocrisy and it is pretty much a case of the pot calling the kettle black?

More than likely it’s mostly ignorance and the author is, as he even labeled those who choose to believe and follow as “true believers,” one of those who has become a “True Believer” in the power of censorship and propaganda and he feels safer that way.

In today’s brain dead world, it is far more effective to just call anything you don’t agree with a conspiracy theory because the overwhelming majority of people are too lazy and incapable of researching and learning for themselves. It is for that reason, logic should tell us that there is more to the promotion of discrediting a person than just pinning on the label. The effort had to exist to bring this society to a point that everything they believe comes from a tiny hand-held electronic device, which now we know as being completely censored.

With this amount of human manipulation and mind control, carrying out such things as Operation COVID-19 becomes quite easy.

Share

Operation COVID-19: “All Roads…Run Through Testing.”

This morning Jesuit liar for Donald Trump, Anthony Fauci, warned that if we “reopen” the “economy” too soon, it could lead to more COVID-19 outbreaks.

The stage for a complete fascist takeover is still being set up. Few can or will see or recognize the obvious. The ultimate goal, and what would agree with Scriptural Prophecy, is that “both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond,” (Rev. 13) receive a “mark”, and that without that “mark” nobody will be allowed out of their houses without running the risk of being caught and forced to take the government’s “mark” or die.

Whether this particular phase of Operation COVID-19 is that event, only time will tell. Perhaps it is a test run in order for the Global Power Structure to gain better understanding of what it is going to take to scare enough people into giving in and succumbing to the Beast System’s authority.

In the article that I provided a link to above, there are two issues in that piece that I would like to draw your attention to. The first I find puzzling. Perhaps I am reading into what was written or what is puzzling me is simply atrocious writing and reporting. Here’s what the author wrote as I’ve copied from the article: “Fauci, a member of Trump’s coronavirus task force, told the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that the nation’s efforts to battle the deadly virus and the COVID-19 disease it triggers should be “focused on the proven public health practices of containment and mitigation.”” (emphasis added)

I have tried to explain to readers that there is a virus that is called Coronavirus, more or less a catchall name that has been around for a long, long time, some of which have been deliberately released into the world population. COVID-19 became the official name of this particular “outbreak” of Coronaviruses.

As the fascist movement took over, crushing the world’s freedoms and disregarding the rights of many, it became clear, to me anyway, that what was taking place wasn’t particularly in line with any way to react to a real pandemic. Either that or the world’s medical professionals are dumber than a bag of rocks. That is why I named the actions and reactions to COVID-19, Operation COVID-19 because it more resembled a military operation, the likes of which we have seen and been subjected to for centuries.

What I highlighted above makes me ask if the author is just a terrible writer or is this an attempt to tell us that this “coronavirus” is deadly and the “COVID-19 DISEASE” is something that is somehow “triggered?” If so, beyond some terrible medical explanation, who or what is “triggering” the virus that in turn then becomes COVID-19, whatever that really is?

The second item in this article is a bit more relevant to the topic of the Beast System and THEIR effort to bring all humans left alive into submission and subjection. The question should be, what is it that the Global Power Structure intends to do that will scare us all into subjection? I think it is clear that THEY intend to “mark” us and label us and then track us. How will this be done once we are scared into submission?

The article states this quote from Republican Chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions: “All roads back to work and back to school run through testing and that what our country has done so far on testing is impressive, but not nearly enough.”

I have been saying for some time now that the longer THEY keep us locked up and sufficiently restricted, eventually we will do most anything to get back to some semblance of a normal life…like getting back to work and getting our children back to being brainwashed educated.

If that’s what you want to do – get back to work and get the children back in school – then step forward and agree to be tested, labeled, “marked,” and tracked (TRACE – TRACE Act – H.R. 6666 – yeah, no kidding).

ALL ROADS, I repeat, ALL ROADS…run through TESTING…but it’s NOT NEARLY ENOUGH.

Whether it’s this round of Operation COVID-19 or the next made-up disaster that gets “triggered,” eventually THEY will get you. It’s only a matter of when. If you are still here, will you agree to take the “mark?”

Share

“Q” A Member of Republican Party

Still blinded and deceived by “Q” and the supposed “Anons” that do the deceiving? Yeah, I figured so.

Ask yourself one simple question. If “Q” is so wonderful and the “answer” to their self-proclaimed “Great Awakening,” why then does “Q” and his followers only present themselves as obvious members of the the party of Republicans? They present themselves as holier than thou and even invoking Scripture on their convenient behalf as though only Trump and his followers of “anonymous” republicans hold the holy truth.

If anyone or group was seeking actual truth, TRUTH does NOT have a political party or an idealogical liberal or conservative bias. Truth is truth!

“Q” yesterday posted the New International Version of Ephesians 6:10-18, but in the context that his followers should consider the Democrat Party as the current evil ones in which such “armor” is needed to withstand.

This isn’t to say the Democrat Party isn’t evil. It is just as evil as the Republican Party. It is blasphemy that any political anarchist group should use the falsely interpreted Word of God to promote their own “devil’s schemes,” and wage a battle against those they claim as “rulers,” “authorities,” and “powers of this dark world.”

One should find it equally odd that the Lord God’s commandments to his followers were to have nothing to do with the creations of men, including man’s governments and yet “Q,” believing himself to be self-righteous, a “god” in his own mind, draws others into his government schemes with the false hope that by “putting on the full armor” man’s government creation will somehow become holy.

Perhaps the ideology of making things better can be somewhat appreciated, but remember the words of Jesus Christ when being questioned by the Scribes and Pharisees. He said, “Can Satan cast out Satan?”

Don’t be drawn in. Observe from afar.

Share

When Life Has Been “Turned Upside Down,” Turn It Right Side Up

Because we are being subjected to Operation COVID-19, people are repeatedly saying to me, “None of this makes any sense.” Today I responded with, “That’s the modus operandi of the Locust Race that is running the world now.” Many things this Locust Race tries to hide from the Lord God’s people, they turn upside down. It seems they don’t even need to try to hide anything anymore. Upside down, backwards and craziness is the new and readily accepted normal. Locust craziness runs everything. To those with eyes and ears, we see that things are simply upside down and backwards.

Here’s a photo, a meme I guess THEY call it now, of an example, made to be a bit humorous, but is it?

Isn’t it just insane? We see the Locust Race is quarantining the healthy people and sending the sick out with promises they will be “traced.” We are told by these insane locusts that jails must be emptied so as not to spread COVID-19, and then police arrest people who are healthy and want and need to go back to work and throw them in jail. A bar that was opened in protest was raided by a Texas SWAT team. New York runs up the panic flag, scaring people about all the deaths from Coronavirus and the need for more hospital equipment, and then we learn that nearly 70% of all those coronavirus victims, are staying at home. There is no end to this upside down madness.

In the following YouTube video, an angry Italian member of their government rages on about the lies being given to the people that 25,000 died from Coronavirus, claiming the vast majority of deaths during this time were from other causes. Better get it before YouTube (Google owns) scrubs it.

The gentlemen speaks of the “upside down and backwards” workings saying that when Italy was in the middle of what officials called a “red zone” (when supposedly Italy was at the height of the “Plandemic”), nobody was wearing masks and nobody was demanding that people wear masks. But now that it appears the “Plandemic” is easing up, government is forcing people to wear face masks. Absurd. Why?

So, if you are one of those lucky ones who thinks and sees things as though the madness has turned things upside down, don’t panic because everything IS upside down.

Share

Like Gun Control Laws, Fascist Political Leaders Ignore Their Own COVID Laws

We see it all the time. Federal politicians who ignore the very laws they make, showing us (those with a brain) that THEIR laws are made for the attendees of the Bread and Circus events while THEY simply ignore them. There’s more than one meaning to this. The obvious is that lawmakers in Washington understand that THEY are the posterity, i.e. those the Constitution was crafted for and not the false belief in we the people. In other words, THEY are We the People, and the rest of us are we the people…serfs, servants, slaves, low-lifes, scum, expendable cow dung, forced to remain locked up in our homes, wear face masks, not work, lose our businesses, face food shortages, hoarding, social distancing and very limited access to life in general.

Some of you get angry and are outraged when, to you, it appears the lawmakers present themselves “above” the rule of law. Wake up. THEY are above the law. It was designed that way. And yet, you continue to convince yourselves it is something else. This is insanity.

The second issue that should be realized when we see lawmaker ignoring their own laws, is the fact that, as an example, Operation COVID-19, not only was designed and carried out against we the people, not We the People, but the very same criminal bastard locusts that are making the laws to oppress the people, know that COVID-19 is not real and/or is no real threat. As such, why are so many of our “leaders” not heeding the laws and guidelines they devised to bring the rest of us to our knees?

Here are three examples that should open your eyes….but won’t. First, we saw a news report (lies, all lies in case you forget) that Vice President Pence visited a Mayo Clinic and didn’t wear a mask.

Second, President Trump visited a factory where they make the masks his fascist administration forces, along with state governments, all of us to wear, and yet, he doesn’t bother to put on a face mask.

And third, this is a second hand story that came directly from a person that was on a plane in which Maine Senator Susan Collins was on. I was told that the airline (no names) required all passengers to wear face masks. In other words, you were not allowed to board the plane without a face mask on.

There were approximately 5 or 6 passengers, total, not counting any pilots or flight crew, on the plane. All passengers were wearing face masks until Senator Collins boarded the plane…without a face mask. As I understand it, she wasn’t even made, like all the other passengers, to wear a face mask to board the plane.

Before the plane left the airport, I was told all passengers removed their face masks for the duration of the flight.

Wake up! You are being duped! The politicians are crooks, liars, deceivers, criminals, locusts, serpents, pond scum. They know what’s going on. You are being taken to the cleaners.

And, evidently you like it.

Share