October 26, 2020

And STILL You Think the CONstitution is for YOU

The below information was sent to me in an email. Most of it is true (but much of it is not true in the way you have been trained to believe). What props up the claim that the world has gone insane is that perhaps millions of Americans will read this, see it as true, and then everything remains exactly the same as it was before it was read. Why? Because the CONstitution is was perpetuates a Rigged System. How many times must it be said that you cannot change a rigged system by operating with a Rigged System. Yes, that’s insanity!

Of the perhaps millions of people who would read this (it’s more than 141 characters so the overwhelming majority of people won’t take the time to read it, say nothing about comprehending the bigger meaning and learning anything from it.) and agree with it, or find truth in it, will then turn around and continue to repeat the lies they have been programmed to rinse and repeat…that the United States Constitution was and is written for them. They actually think “We the People” is referring to themselves and yet if they agree with what is written below, how can it be?

How many Americans died because they believed they were defending the United States Constitution as though it was a document intended to keep them free? And yet, read on and nod your head. Agree to all the disgusting atrocities these 545 assholes have foisted onto innocent people, people that the same assholes have for over a century brainwashed into believing this crap sandwich that they are looking our for you because you are part of “We the People.”

We are incapable of learning anymore. We are clinically insane…made that way on purpose. And you prove your own insanity because you will think I’m nuts.

545 vs. 300,000,000 People  -By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits? Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes? You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The President does. You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does. You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does. You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does. One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country. I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank. I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes. Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party. What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House now ?  She and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to. It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist. If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red. If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it’s because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan … If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way. There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do. Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible. They, and they alone, have the power. They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees… We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!  
What you do with this article now that you have read it… is up to you.
This might be funny if it weren’t so true.
Be sure to read all the way to the end: Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table,
At which he’s fed. Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule. Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for
peanuts anyway! Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat. Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt. Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think. Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears. Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass. Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won’t be done
Till he has no dough. When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He’s good and sore. Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he’s laid… Put these words
Upon his tomb,
‘Taxes drove me
to my doom…’ When he’s gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax. Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Sales Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax 
STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom
, if agreed, stayed home to raise the kids.What in the heck happened? Can you spell ‘politicians?’

Share

Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship

SMOKE AND MIRRORS – Q Followers Think This is a Big Deal

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Policy.Free speech is the bedrock of American democracy.  Our Founding Fathers protected this sacred right with the First Amendment to the Constitution.  The freedom to express and debate ideas is the foundation for all of our rights as a free people.

In a country that has long cherished the freedom of expression, we cannot allow a limited number of online platforms to hand pick the speech that Americans may access and convey on the internet.  This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic.  When large, powerful social media companies censor opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous power.  They cease functioning as passive bulletin boards, and ought to be viewed and treated as content creators.

The growth of online platforms in recent years raises important questions about applying the ideals of the First Amendment to modern communications technology.  Today, many Americans follow the news, stay in touch with friends and family, and share their views on current events through social media and other online platforms.  As a result, these platforms function in many ways as a 21st century equivalent of the public square.

Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube wield immense, if not unprecedented, power to shape the interpretation of public events; to censor, delete, or disappear information; and to control what people see or do not see.

As President, I have made clear my commitment to free and open debate on the internet. Such debate is just as important online as it is in our universities, our town halls, and our homes.  It is essential to sustaining our democracy.

Online platforms are engaging in selective censorship that is harming our national discourse.  Tens of thousands of Americans have reported, among other troubling behaviors, online platforms “flagging” content as inappropriate, even though it does not violate any stated terms of service; making unannounced and unexplained changes to company policies that have the effect of disfavoring certain viewpoints; and deleting content and entire accounts with no warning, no rationale, and no recourse.

Twitter now selectively decides to place a warning label on certain tweets in a manner that clearly reflects political bias.  As has been reported, Twitter seems never to have placed such a label on another politician’s tweet.  As recently as last week, Representative Adam Schiff was continuing to mislead his followers by peddling the long-disproved Russian Collusion Hoax, and Twitter did not flag those tweets.  Unsurprisingly, its officer in charge of so-called ‘Site Integrity’ has flaunted his political bias in his own tweets.

At the same time online platforms are invoking inconsistent, irrational, and groundless justifications to censor or otherwise restrict Americans’ speech here at home, several online platforms are profiting from and promoting the aggression and disinformation spread by foreign governments like China.  One United States company, for example, created a search engine for the Chinese Communist Party that would have blacklisted searches for “human rights,” hid data unfavorable to the Chinese Communist Party, and tracked users determined appropriate for surveillance.  It also established research partnerships in China that provide direct benefits to the Chinese military.  Other companies have accepted advertisements paid for by the Chinese government that spread false information about China’s mass imprisonment of religious minorities, thereby enabling these abuses of human rights.  They have also amplified China’s propaganda abroad, including by allowing Chinese government officials to use their platforms to spread misinformation regarding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to undermine pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.

As a Nation, we must foster and protect diverse viewpoints in today’s digital communications environment where all Americans can and should have a voice.  We must seek transparency and accountability from online platforms, and encourage standards and tools to protect and preserve the integrity and openness of American discourse and freedom of expression.

Sec. 2.  Protections Against Online Censorship.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States to foster clear ground rules promoting free and open debate on the internet.  Prominent among the ground rules governing that debate is the immunity from liability created by section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act (section 230(c)).  47 U.S.C. 230(c).  It is the policy of the United States that the scope of that immunity should be clarified: the immunity should not extend beyond its text and purpose to provide protection for those who purport to provide users a forum for free and open speech, but in reality use their power over a vital means of communication to engage in deceptive or pretextual actions stifling free and open debate by censoring certain viewpoints.

Section 230(c) was designed to address early court decisions holding that, if an online platform restricted access to some content posted by others, it would thereby become a “publisher” of all the content posted on its site for purposes of torts such as defamation.  As the title of section 230(c) makes clear, the provision provides limited liability “protection” to a provider of an interactive computer service (such as an online platform) that engages in “‘Good Samaritan’ blocking” of harmful content.  In particular, the Congress sought to provide protections for online platforms that attempted to protect minors from harmful content and intended to ensure that such providers would not be discouraged from taking down harmful material.  The provision was also intended to further the express vision of the Congress that the internet is a “forum for a true diversity of political discourse.”  47 U.S.C. 230(a)(3).  The limited protections provided by the statute should be construed with these purposes in mind.

In particular, subparagraph (c)(2) expressly addresses protections from “civil liability” and specifies that an interactive computer service provider may not be made liable “on account of” its decision in “good faith” to restrict access to content that it considers to be “obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing or otherwise objectionable.”  It is the policy of the United States to ensure that, to the maximum extent permissible under the law, this provision is not distorted to provide liability protection for online platforms that — far from acting in “good faith” to remove objectionable content — instead engage in deceptive or pretextual actions (often contrary to their stated terms of service) to stifle viewpoints with which they disagree.  Section 230 was not intended to allow a handful of companies to grow into titans controlling vital avenues for our national discourse under the guise of promoting open forums for debate, and then to provide those behemoths blanket immunity when they use their power to censor content and silence viewpoints that they dislike.  When an interactive computer service provider removes or restricts access to content and its actions do not meet the criteria of subparagraph (c)(2)(A), it is engaged in editorial conduct.  It is the policy of the United States that such a provider should properly lose the limited liability shield of subparagraph (c)(2)(A) and be exposed to liability like any traditional editor and publisher that is not an online provider.

(b)  To advance the policy described in subsection (a) of this section, all executive departments and agencies should ensure that their application of section 230(c) properly reflects the narrow purpose of the section and take all appropriate actions in this regard.  In addition, within 60 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), in consultation with the Attorney General, and acting through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), shall file a petition for rulemaking with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requesting that the FCC expeditiously propose regulations to clarify:

(i) the interaction between subparagraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of section 230, in particular to clarify and determine the circumstances under which a provider of an interactive computer service that restricts access to content in a manner not specifically protected by subparagraph (c)(2)(A) may also not be able to claim protection under subparagraph (c)(1), which merely states that a provider shall not be treated as a publisher or speaker for making third-party content available and does not address the provider’s responsibility for its own editorial decisions;

(ii)  the conditions under which an action restricting access to or availability of material is not “taken in good faith” within the meaning of subparagraph (c)(2)(A) of section 230, particularly whether actions can be “taken in good faith” if they are:

(A)  deceptive, pretextual, or inconsistent with a provider’s terms of service; or

(B)  taken after failing to provide adequate notice, reasoned explanation, or a meaningful opportunity to be heard; and

(iii)  any other proposed regulations that the NTIA concludes may be appropriate to advance the policy described in subsection (a) of this section.

Sec. 3.  Protecting Federal Taxpayer Dollars from Financing Online Platforms That Restrict Free Speech.  (a)  The head of each executive department and agency (agency) shall review its agency’s Federal spending on advertising and marketing paid to online platforms.  Such review shall include the amount of money spent, the online platforms that receive Federal dollars, and the statutory authorities available to restrict their receipt of advertising dollars.

(b)  Within 30 days of the date of this order, the head of each agency shall report its findings to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

(c)  The Department of Justice shall review the viewpoint-based speech restrictions imposed by each online platform identified in the report described in subsection (b) of this section and assess whether any online platforms are problematic vehicles for government speech due to viewpoint discrimination, deception to consumers, or other bad practices.

Sec. 4.  Federal Review of Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States that large online platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, as the critical means of promoting the free flow of speech and ideas today, should not restrict protected speech.  The Supreme Court has noted that social media sites, as the modern public square, “can provide perhaps the most powerful mechanisms available to a private citizen to make his or her voice heard.”  Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct. 1730, 1737 (2017).  Communication through these channels has become important for meaningful participation in American democracy, including to petition elected leaders.  These sites are providing an important forum to the public for others to engage in free expression and debate.  CfPruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 85-89 (1980).

(b)  In May of 2019, the White House launched a Tech Bias Reporting tool to allow Americans to report incidents of online censorship.  In just weeks, the White House received over 16,000 complaints of online platforms censoring or otherwise taking action against users based on their political viewpoints.  The White House will submit such complaints received to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

(c)  The FTC shall consider taking action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, pursuant to section 45 of title 15, United States Code.  Such unfair or deceptive acts or practice may include practices by entities covered by section 230 that restrict speech in ways that do not align with those entities’ public representations about those practices.

(d)  For large online platforms that are vast arenas for public debate, including the social media platform Twitter, the FTC shall also, consistent with its legal authority, consider whether complaints allege violations of law that implicate the policies set forth in section 4(a) of this order.  The FTC shall consider developing a report describing such complaints and making the report publicly available, consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 5.  State Review of Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices and Anti-Discrimination Laws.  (a)  The Attorney General shall establish a working group regarding the potential enforcement of State statutes that prohibit online platforms from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices.  The working group shall also develop model legislation for consideration by legislatures in States where existing statutes do not protect Americans from such unfair and deceptive acts and practices. The working group shall invite State Attorneys General for discussion and consultation, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law.

(b) Complaints described in section 4(b) of this order will be shared with the working group, consistent with applicable law. The working group shall also collect publicly available information regarding the following:

(i) increased scrutiny of users based on the other users they choose to follow, or their interactions with other users;

(ii) algorithms to suppress content or users based on indications of political alignment or viewpoint;

(iii) differential policies allowing for otherwise impermissible behavior, when committed by accounts associated with the Chinese Communist Party or other anti-democratic associations or governments;

(iv) reliance on third-party entities, including contractors, media organizations, and individuals, with indicia of bias to review content; and

(v) acts that limit the ability of users with particular viewpoints to earn money on the platform compared with other users similarly situated.

Sec. 6.  Legislation.  The Attorney General shall develop a proposal for Federal legislation that would be useful to promote the policy objectives of this order.

Sec. 7.  Definition.  For purposes of this order, the term “online platform” means any website or application that allows users to create and share content or engage in social networking, or any general search engine.

Sec. 8.  General Provisions. (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)    the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)   the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Share

“Q” A Member of Republican Party

Still blinded and deceived by “Q” and the supposed “Anons” that do the deceiving? Yeah, I figured so.

Ask yourself one simple question. If “Q” is so wonderful and the “answer” to their self-proclaimed “Great Awakening,” why then does “Q” and his followers only present themselves as obvious members of the the party of Republicans? They present themselves as holier than thou and even invoking Scripture on their convenient behalf as though only Trump and his followers of “anonymous” republicans hold the holy truth.

If anyone or group was seeking actual truth, TRUTH does NOT have a political party or an idealogical liberal or conservative bias. Truth is truth!

“Q” yesterday posted the New International Version of Ephesians 6:10-18, but in the context that his followers should consider the Democrat Party as the current evil ones in which such “armor” is needed to withstand.

This isn’t to say the Democrat Party isn’t evil. It is just as evil as the Republican Party. It is blasphemy that any political anarchist group should use the falsely interpreted Word of God to promote their own “devil’s schemes,” and wage a battle against those they claim as “rulers,” “authorities,” and “powers of this dark world.”

One should find it equally odd that the Lord God’s commandments to his followers were to have nothing to do with the creations of men, including man’s governments and yet “Q,” believing himself to be self-righteous, a “god” in his own mind, draws others into his government schemes with the false hope that by “putting on the full armor” man’s government creation will somehow become holy.

Perhaps the ideology of making things better can be somewhat appreciated, but remember the words of Jesus Christ when being questioned by the Scribes and Pharisees. He said, “Can Satan cast out Satan?”

Don’t be drawn in. Observe from afar.

Share

The Next Five Minutes Are Going to Be GREAT!

Share

In Lockdown? MAGA Aye? What Was That About The Next Five Years Again?

By Rob Skiba

In lockdown? Great! STOP watching TV and DO SOME FREAKING RESEARCH!!! I dare ya. Because IF you do, you will soon realize…

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust the Rothschild/Rockefeller “medical establishment” for ANYTHING related to your health and wellbeing.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust the CDC.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust the FDA.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust mainstream media – especially if you take the time to actually look into who owns what and where your “news” really comes from.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust your government (that should be a given, yet so many still do anyway).

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust ANY U.S. president – past, present or future – until we finally end up with one that is NOT related to every other one, right back to King John Lackland. And yes, this includes Trump.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust ANYTHING coming from NASA.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust ANYTHING coming from the United Nations.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust ANYTHING coming from the Freemasons, the Skull and Bones, Jesuits, or any of the other frat-boy clubs all the psychopathic Luciferian “elite” belong to.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust ANYONE who attends the Bilderberg meetings or spends time in the Bohemian Grove.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust “Q” or “the Plan” – especially since you can’t vet any of it or know for sure who’s really behind it and what the actual end game is.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust Hollywood and all the propaganda they peddle.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust ANYTHING coming from Bill Gates.

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust in vaccines!!

You have absolutely NO good reason to trust in the public education system.

Sadly… there’s very little reason to trust “theologians” or the “Christian Church” for much of anything these day too. The whole Bible (to them) is apparently all “poetry” now and it’s OK to “Christianize paganism,” and a whole host of other things that are NOT Biblical. Many of these theologians and churches simply don’t believe the Book they claim to believe, so there’s no hope there either.

In fact, the more you research, the more you will see the ONLY One you can trust is YHWH and our ONLY hope is in Him and in following His ways! And when you finally realize that, suddenly all your fears will go away and you end up with that “peace that passes all understanding.” Given all of the above, this is the best place to be. But don’t take my word for it. Take the challenge and see for yourself.

Rob Skiba

Share

It Is Time to BUST QAnon

Q is the image of the beast.. The Q is representing the host body minus the Angel, thus the Angel is dead and only the demon resides in the host body.. The new species taking over the new system.. The removal of the twin host spirit of disobedience versus the Spirit of Yeshua yoke, thus a completely demonic. unleashed the beast system—Fallon

By Noel J. Hadley

R.I.P.
Federal Reserve
(1913-2020)
It would feel pretty good, wouldn’t it?
Clinton in cuffs. Pope Francis on trial. IRS goes bye-bye. CIA shredded into a dozen pieces. Classified becomes declassified. Rome exposed. The political, corporate, religious, and Hollywood elite arrested worldwide. You know, drain the swamp. All these things, “Q” promises. Its entire narrative from beginning to end is dripping with dueling psyops and spy vs spy espionage, all of which promises a climatic ending beyond anything we’ve yet to experience in human history.
“Trust the plan,” we’re told. Never mind that President Trump is holding hands with Zionists. “Just trust the plan.”
The lights go out in three days.
Or so the claim goes.
People keep writing me privately, asking my thoughts on the legitimacy of “Q.” Guys, I don’t know. I haven’t the faintest clue. Still, if this thing doesn’t go down on April 1, as planned, with ten days of internet and media darkness to follow (in order that worldwide arrests might be made), then I admit—I’ll be disappointed, even if this is a pipe dream.
But here’s the thing. The more I dig into this “Q” Movement phenomena sweeping the worldwide web, the more I find myself confronting something nearly just as disturbing as the evil it pronounces upon its enemies. While stars and stripes bleed from everyone’s eyes, “Q” is an obvious worship of the beast system—the very beast its adherents claim to be fighting against, blended with New Age spirituality, all of which is cleverly camouflaged under a skin-deep Biblical facade.
For example, the personality behind “Q” appears to favor John 3:16. Q-Post #34 directly states: “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.”
Elsewhere, Q-Post #790 (2018-02-19) states: “THE DAY OF RECKONING IS UPON US. JOHN 3:16.” This is apparently a reference to April 10, 2010, according to many “Q” proponents—Good Friday—when Trump or possibly even John F Kennedy Jr will rise victorious over the evil cabal.
Q’s very next post, #791, quotes from Jeremiah 29:11, and reads: “‘For I know the plans I have for you,’ declares the Lord, ‘plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.'”
While Trump holds hands with Zionists, apparently Jesus is holding hands with Trump. For the “Q” patriot, the coming purge will be a victory for God. Jesus is working with Trump to reclaim America.
Q-Post #793 claims:
“GO WITH GOD.
THE CLOCK IS ACTIVATED.
Q.”
And yet, the “Q” Movement can best be summed up in one recent tweet, where a woman wrote: “Much will be revealed when the strange trance humanity is in is lifted.”
Put it in slightly other words, if the “Q” Movement is to be believed, we’re about to enter the long promised age of Aquarius. Evil will finally be vexed. Trump will prove himself so much more than an elite entrepreneur and politician. He will be a spiritual shaman; a miracle worker; the agent of mass-awakening. Peace and safety.
If this is in any way legit, and “Q” follows through with even ten percent of its promises, then I expect whatever is waiting for us on the other side is far worse than what its online army of patriots dare to imagine.
Do you remember that episode of The Twilight Zone where the alien leaves behind his “play book” in the United Nations assembly and, once decoded, it’s a cook book?
Satan is playing everyone.
Shalom.

Share

Pure Propaganda by the Angel of the Bottomless Pit

The political President’s and their Administrations along with their cohorts the congressional and senate public office holders are not divided, they have been orchestrating a plan of division against the followers of the political paradigm, exploit them, oppress them, totally deceive them, make everything hard on them and make it as evil as possible so they will accept the false light, the false Messiah.. Who will appear to them to be Jesus Christ, who will cancel the debts and punish the wicked.. Who will put on a great show before showing them who he really is and it will be to late for them.. One bird two heads and two wings..

Share

Trump Hung Out With Pedophiles/Trump Chumps Can’t Handle the Truth

Share

A New Twist on “The Image of the Beast”

Share

And the Darwin Awards Goes To The Natural Man

If we look all around at everything going on around us within every culture every group we see they the natural man are extremely dissatisfied with the customs and traditions natural law world system they’re all trying to, fighting to fix..Those stuck in the manufactured daydream of Lollipop History, simply haven’t a clue as to what is really going on. But somehow they’re all going to fix this world system.

Law of Hammurabi. Council of Trent. Law of Nations. International Law. Politically Chartered Vatican City State. Politically Chartered Great Britain. Politically Charted United States. Politically Chartered Atlantic Charter United Nations. Politically Chartered United Nations Environmental Policies.

All the elements of the United Nations Environmental Policies Economic STRIFE have been LET LOOSE upon the Earth by those seeking to depopulate direct drivers – people. Every Nation/State/estate/society on this earth is subordinated to the Temporal Power of the Pope, the real owners of the customs and traditions of mankind. They are ALL implementing economical eugenics..

1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man perceiveth not the things of the Spirit of EL: for they are foolishness unto him, neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Casuistry/sophism is an aspect of a piece of political philosophy for political purpose writing that is deliberately written so that the average reader will understand it as saying one (“exoteric”) thing but the special few for whom it is intended will grasp its real (“esoteric”) meaning. We could call it Double Speak. Only it’s much worse. It’s to easy to decode the Double Speak so they’ve implemented English Hebrew Alphanumerical coding into their clever communications. Somebody might want to tell the English Anglish literal experts..

So it is settled, the Darwin Awards Goes To The Natural Man trying to save this world by helping the owners of this world system managing their world. Which is according to their legalized rhetoric over populated with, you guessed it, natural men loving their law of nature.

Share