In regard to Maine’s Senator Susan Collins, described as “a socialist wrapped in a Marxist inside a fascist,” who refuses to vote to approve any Supreme Court nominee who might disapprove of Roe v. Wade, the following comment:
“This fool actually believes that Roe is settled law but, the Second Amendment is not.”
This morning I rolled out of bed around 4:30 a.m. and stumbled to the living room. I had to take a friend to the airport. While waiting, I snapped on the television to the local news channel. A report was being filed of a search for a missing man that has been charged with three counts of murder – a man, a woman, and an unborn child. The report clearly stated that the wanted man was being charged with the murder of the unborn fetus.
This prompted me to take a look at Florida statutes about murder and unborn children. I wondered if there was an age limit. NOPE!
Florida law states that: “The unlawful killing of an unborn child, by any injury to the mother of such child which would be murder if it resulted in the death of such mother, shall be deemed murder in the same degree as that which would have been committed against the mother. Any person, other than the mother, who unlawfully kills an unborn child by any injury to the mother:”
The insanity in this is that a mother can murder her own unborn child even if up until a specific length of time in a woman’s womb. Florida law specifically states: “This section does not authorize the prosecution of any person in connection with a termination of pregnancy pursuant to chapter 390.”
This is as insane as any misguided person or group of persons – those that receive their “truth” from the “State” – can get. If you don’t see this, I’m sorry for you.
According to the CDC (a government agency of which there is no rational reason to believe anything they report), over 650,000 “legal” reported abortions were performed in 2014. I wonder how many happened that was illegal and unreported?
One also has to point out that with such hypocrisy in our laws, it must be that the charge of murder of a fetus to anyone killing a mother, is clearly devised as retribution to the murderer and in no way protection for the unborn child. When a State allows for the murder of an unborn fetus with no consequences to the mother, and yet charges murder of an unborn fetus to anyone else who kills the mother, resulting in the death of an unborn child, is insanity! This makes no sense!
And we are supposed to bury our heads in the sand and believe Yahweh will not punish this nation?
Insane debate rages in Maine over a proposed constitutional amendment wrongly presented as a guaranteed right to hunt, fish and trap.
Last week I was reading an article that contained some comments from those opposed to the amendment and those in favor of such. In one comment from a member of the opposition a woman stated, “This proposal’s vague terms open the door to inhumane, unethical trapping and hunting practices.”
We are subjected to the nonsensical drivel of the animal rights perverts but consider the realities here and then take a step back and ask yourself just exactly who is inhumane, unethical and insane.
It is always the Left who promote animal rights, while presenting animals as sentient beings of and above the existence of man, endowed with all the same rights, and more, as man. Any form of killing of an animal to these perverse followers of Satanic animal worship is considered “inhumane.” Ever stopped for a minute to understand what the word “inhumane” is derived from? I didn’t think so.
And so, in this one tiny discussion, it is believed by an obvious Leftist that a constitutional amendment suggesting that hunting, fishing and trapping be utilized as a means of controlling the population of certain game animals, will lead to “inhumane, unethical” practices.
Forget that this statement makes no sense at all, and just consider the positions always taken by the Left that make absolutely no sense, contradict their own stated positions and expose themselves as the ignorant frauds that they are.
The Left opposes the killing on ANY animal because doing so is “inhumane” and “unethical.” (understand that many of the same eat dead animals) However, they will give their own lives to defend what they call the right to mutilate and murder an unborn baby. To these mixed up individuals, which number in the millions, it is somehow humane and ethical to pop the head of an unborn baby, tear it to pieces and toss it in a garbage can, and yet hunting, fishing and trapping is inhumane.
Geez! At least most hunters eat what they kill. Do Leftists eat mutilated babies?
Perhaps then, if this country insists on living as mixed up, immoral murderers of babies while protecting animals, wildlife managers should begin a system of capturing and aborting the unwanted fetuses of animals in order to, not only control the population of certain species of animals but to also protect the rights of the female game animals who, according to many on the Left, should enjoy the same “rights” as us immoral and murdering, unethical and inhumane, Americans.
Nothing abnormal here. Move along.
“In Washington today, there was a 238-to-183 vote to forever end taxpayer funding of abortion. Representative Chris Smith (R-NJ) introduced the No Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Act (HR 7)—it permanently solidifies the otherwise-known Hyde Amendment, which has been prone to yearly renewal.”<<<Read More>>>
“The Portland Sea Dogs will not be serving Linda Bean’s Maine Lobster at Hadlock Field concession stands this season, according to a press release Monday from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
David Byer, a spokesman for PETA, said the organization contacted the Sea Dogs during the 2014 season, showing team officials video footage of lobsters and crabs being processed at Bean’s Rockland plant in “crude and cruel methods.” He said PETA was told earlier this month of the team’s decision to stop selling the product.”<<<Read More>>>
Instead, let’s promote the practice of “crude and cruel methods” of murdering unborn babies, by ripping their legs and arms off while still alive, sticking needles in their heads or sucking them apart with a vacuum cleaner. PETA thinks that ripping live lobsters apart is “crude and cruel.” And yet I doubt they even consider the same treatment of humans as crude and cruel.
PETA is a fringe group of perverted freaks and so what does that say about the owners of the Portland Sea Dogs? If they intend to honor the perverse ideologue of PETA then I would have to seriously consider whether I would ever attend another Sea Dogs baseball game.
Five Reasons for Americans to Applaud Hobby Lobby’s Victory: Freedom, Finances, Privacy, Equality and the Constitution
Washington DC – National Center for Public Policy Research Chairman Amy Ridenour has the following statement regarding the Supreme Court’s decision today in Burwell (formerly Sebelius) v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Burwell to strike down ObamaCare’s HHS contraception mandate and uphold an employer’s right not to be forced to provide birth control and early abortion drugs and devices to employees against their conscience(s):
Today’s decision was a victory for freedom, because a person who does not have the right to order his or her professional and personal life in accordance with his or her religious beliefs does not have freedom at all.
Supporters of the mandate who claimed incorporated businesses cannot exercise religion ignore that corporations are directed by human beings, and nothing in the act of incorporating strips away the humanity of business owners. There are many examples of businesses being operated under the constraints of their owners’ religious beliefs. Chik-Fil-A forgoes significant profit by closing every Sunday for religious reasons, for example. If it were not possible for a corporation to exercise religious beliefs, Chik-Fil-A would be open on Sundays.
There are five key reasons Americans – women, men, liberals, conservatives, religious, atheists, users of birth control and non-users, should celebrate the Hobby Lobby decision today: freedom, finances, privacy, equality and the Constitution.
Freedom. If you believe birth control or abortion is morally wrong, you shouldn’t have to buy it for others just because you offered them a job. Under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the federal government can only force people to violate their religious beliefs if the government has an extremely important reason for doing so and the government cannot accomplish its goals in any less restrictive way. It is debatable whether the provision of birth control and early abortion drugs and devices is even a function of the federal government, but even if that is to be so, clearly there are other ways of distributing these easily-accessible, inexpensive drugs and devices without forcing the involvement of religious employers.
Finances. Employees and employers should have the legal right to negotiate the pay packages that work best for them. If an employee would rather be paid in cold hard cash than birth control, the federal government has no moral right to tell her she cannot negotiate such terms. Cash can buy birth control, if that is desired by the employee. It can also buy groceries. Some employees prefer groceries.
Privacy. Bosses don’t belong in bedrooms, and ObamaCare’s insistence on forcing employers to pay for birth control puts employers there – and the federal government in there with them. Employees have the right to close their bedroom doors. Nothing about this case has been more nonsensical than supporters of the contraception mandate claiming that employers who don’t want to be involved in their employees’ birth control are somehow meddling in their employees’ personal lives.
Equality. As Obama Administration’s Federal Register makes clear, the birth control mandate was never about helping low income women afford birth control: It was about enhancing the power and financial position of women relative to that of men. It is not the proper role of the federal government to try to help one group of Americans versus another. The government should stand for equality of opportunity, not sexism.
The Constitution. Americans have a First Amendment right to freedom of religion. Whenever this right is upheld, it is strengthened.
Ridenour has written the following on the Hobby Lobby case and HHS birth control mandate: “A Quick Guide to ObamaCare’s HHS Contraceptive Mandate and Why the Supreme Court Should (and Will) Throw It Out” (March 2014), “Hobby Lobby’s Court Victory in HHS Mandate Case is a Victory for Religious and Economic Freedom: Claims of an “Attack on Women who Use Birth Control” are Foolish Leftist Spin,” (July 2013), “9 Takeaways from the Hobby Lobby HHS Contraception Mandate Oral Arguments ” (March 2014), “How Can Senator Patty Murray Be So Ignorant about a Law She Voted For?” (March 2014), “White House Birth Control Statistics Don’t Add Up” (Feb. 2012), “Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz Tells Four Lies in One Sentence, Washington Post Grades Two Pinocchios” (April 2014), ” Democrat Congresswomen Walk Out of HHS Mandate Hearing to Protest Omission of Witness Who Wanted to Talk About Something Else Entirely” (February 2012), “Catholic Bishops Cannot Accept White House ‘Compromise’ on Birth Control Without Surrendering Principles” (Feb. 2012), “16 Seconds To Understanding the HHS Birth Control Mandate” (Oct. 2012), “Should Conservatives Choose HHS Mandate, Climate Change Positions Based on What is Likely to Win the Most Votes? ” (March 2014),” “Would Jesus Pay for Abortions?” (Feb. 2012),” and “Obama Compromise Infringement of the First Amendment is Still Unconstitutional” (Feb. 2012).
In addition, an op-ed by Ridenour about the case ran in 45 newspapers across the United States in January and she has discussed the issue on several dozen radio programs.
The National Center for Public Policy Research, founded in 1982, is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from individuals, three percent from foundations, and three percent from corporations. It receives over 350,000 individual contributions a year from over 96,000 active recent contributors.
Contributions are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated.
Is it because the population has been mentally manipulated and made prepared for the absurdity to things like Obamacare, global warming, going green, etc.? We are blinded, by design, to all things immoral and just plain wrong. And now we have learned that in Obamacare, money will be guaranteed through the law to be used for “planned parenthood” (murdering unborn babies), but in particular to be used in those areas where growing populations of humans are a threat to endangered species. Can it get any worse than this?
“That of the funds appropriated under title III of this Act, not less than $575,000,000 should be made available for family planning/reproductive health, including in areas where population growth threatens biodiversity or endangered species.”
And this comes on the heals of the new Secretary of Interior, Sally Jewell, telling Eskimos who were complaining about going hungry because government prohibits a road to ship food that she’s listened to them enough and that it’s time to pay attention to the animals.
God help us!
Trapping is Cruel? Nah! Reading Drivel From the Clueless is Cruel
Some need to get a life. I’ve overused that saying, attributed to more than one person, including the Bible, that it’s better to keep your mouth shut causing people to wonder if you are stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. Or, how about the comment once made by Alice von Hildebrand: “God has set limit’s on man’s intelligence, none on his stupidity.”
A letter to the editor in a Maine newspaper about trapping describes the act as such: “held there struggling in pain and fear until it dies”, “execute it at point blank range”, “an indifference to life”, “condones suffering”.
Since 1980 there have been 1.3 billion unborn babies murdered; “held there struggling in pain and fear”, “executed at point blank range”, and yes, obviously there’s an “indifference to life” and those billions of people “condone suffering.” So where’s the outrage?
Perverse!