August 6, 2020

Progressing Towards Mandatory “Mark of the Beast”

Yesterday in Maine, voters rejected any attempts to back off on mandatory vaccinations. A referendum vote refused to allow nonmedical exemptions deciding instead to uphold the totalitarian law Maine recently passed that would take the step of mandated vaccinations one step closer to complete government rule.

In a news article from an Online Maine newspaper, the article stated, “Those who support the law said it was deceitful to suggest the pharmaceutical industry had a vested interest in Maine’s law because vaccinations account for such a small fraction of pharmaceutical revenues, even though they account for billions of dollars in sales.”

This may be as it appears today for many people because they have already been caught in the trap. Besides eugenics, money is always the driving factor behind the push of chemicals/drugs on the masses. Why to some it now appears that this is not the case is because BigPharma, i.e. the rigged Beast System, has been highly successful in brainwashing the masses causing them to believe they cannot live without BigPharma’s evil potions. As part of the Beast System, the same system that has intentionally infected the world with a virus, fear of death causes irrational thoughts leading to irrational decision making.

What we are now seeing is a distinct example of the power behind the Hegelian Dialectic, i.e. thesis, reaction, antithesis. With another man-made virus deliberately introduced into the populations of billions world wide, each successive release made bigger and scarier than the last, the automatonic public obediently lines up for their vaccines while demanding the government force all others to take any vaccines they deem necessary.

And we wondered how millions of people would, without protest, line up to receive the mark of the Beast.

What also exemplifies the ignorance, hypocrisy, and irrational, emotional reactions of people is that most of the same people who are insisting that vaccines be a government-mandated event, will fight to the death for the freedom to murder unborn babies.

How does any of this make sense?

In the reactionary phase of the Hegelian Dialectic, we see the desired and preplanned result of what fear can do the masses of the shameless. We should prepare for the preplanned “solution” to the thesis.

Share

Pharma Death Clock

Find out how many men, women and children have been killed by Big Pharma drugs in the United States and around the world, since 2000. For instance, at the time I made this link, 16,000,000 Americans have died from chemotherapy since 2000.

Find out more at Pharma Death Clock.

Share

FDA colludes with Big Pharma to cover up deaths in psych drug trials 

FDA colludes with Big Pharma to cover up deaths in psych drug trials
Source: FDA colludes with Big Pharma to cover up deaths in psych drug trials – NaturalNews.com
Share

Defending Big Pharma? Boy Receives “Experimental” Drug

*Note* – Below is a press release from the National Center for Public Policy Research. The attempt here is to preserve the “process” by which drugs are made available to people. There is however, no need for NCPPR to defend Big Pharma by expressing any fears that drug companies will go broke “giving away” their poisons. Their life-long process of convincing humans they can’t live without daily cocktails of chemicals has been quite successful. Pharmaceutical companies have raked in billions of dollars in profits, all in the name of “research” and the “process” to ensure that Americans get their drugs whether needed or not.

Statement of Risk Analysis Division Director Jeff Stier in Response to Chimerix Decision to Make Experimental Drug Brincidofovir Available to Seven-Year-Old Boy

New York, NY / Washington DC – The following is the response of Jeff Stier, director of the National Center’s Risk Analysis Division, to the decision of the drug company Chimerix to make an experimental drug, Brincidofovir, available to an ailing seven-year-old boy:

I’m happy Josh is getting these drugs, and I hope they work for him and he thrives. It is a heart-wrenching story, and we wish the best for him and his family.

But lost among all the coverage of this story are the critical public policy implications that affect drug development.

Should society expect companies to give away their drugs for compassionate use every time?

The answer isn’t so simple.

Ignored in this powerful emotion-evoking case are two critical components to the very system that bring us miracle lifesaving drugs.

1) We have lifesaving drugs because we have a system of profit-driven innovation. If there’s an expectation that companies should give away medicine simply because the patient, no matter how sympathetic, needs it, companies are going to have a difficult time raising the capital from investors. Those dollars, always risky investments, are a corner-stone of the innovating pharmaceutical industry and the basis for the benefits we enjoy as a result of new medicines.

2) In order to ensure the development of new safe and effective drugs, we all rely on a regulatory environment that allows for an orderly drug trial system. Certainly, the regulations should be more limited and flexible. But the system itself, like profit-driven innovation, is an essential element to the development of drugs we can trust, both today and in the future.

As important as it is that Josh is saved, it is also important to be cognizant of why Josh and his family now have hope. It is because of a system that allows for the innovation of the medicine he so badly needs. Expecting drug companies to give away medicines and always short-circuit the trial system may be satisfying in the short term, but the effects of eroding the system would be devastating. We should all want to preserve a system that works because when this boy grows up and has a seven-year-old boy of his own, that boy could need a cutting-edge drug as well. And if that happens, we want our drug system to be able to provide it for him.

New York City-based Jeff Stier is a Senior Fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research in Washington, D.C., and heads its Risk Analysis Division. Stier has testified at federal, state and local-level scientific and legislative meetings and hearings on health and risk issues.

Stier has addressed health policy on CNBC, CNN, Fox News Channel, MSNBC and network newscasts. Stier’s National Center op-eds have been published in top outlets, including the Los Angeles Times, the New York Post, Newsday, Forbes, the Washington Examiner and National Review Online. He also frequently discusses risk issues on Twitter at @JeffaStier.

The National Center for Public Policy Research, founded in 1982, is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from individuals, less than four percent from foundations, and less than two percent from corporations. It receives over 350,000 individual contributions a year from over 96,000 active recent contributors.
Contributions are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated.

Share