*Note* – A regular reader of this website sent me all the links and information to compile this report. I am thankful for his help. (TKR)

The other day we discovered that “researchers” had published text in the journal Nature stating what they claimed showed that ocean temperatures were warmer than first estimated until a critic and mathematician questioned the margin of error published as part of their findings.

The authors subsequently began to walk back their findings but still claimed that the ocean temperature was still much warmer than original predictions indicated.

To understand this, one has to understand the fraudulent scientism and outcome-based, corrupted “scientific process” these criminal scammers are using. The authors of the fudged article claim: “Much of the data on ocean temperatures currently relies on the Argo array, robotic devices that float at different depths. The program, which started in 2000, has gaps in coverage.

By comparison, Keeling and Laure Resplandy, a researcher at Princeton University’s Environmental Institute who co-authored the report, calculated heat based on the amount of oxygen and carbon dioxide rising off the ocean, filling round glass flasks with air collected at research stations around the globe.”

In case you failed to understand what this is saying, let me see if I can help. No longer are these clowns actually measuring the temperature of the ocean water or the air for that matter. Instead, they are collecting oxygen and carbon dioxide and then calculating what they want the temperature of the water/air to be to fit their fraudulent theory. If you accept this false premise and scientific fraud, it means that you are a promoter and a “True Believer” of the false claim that carbon dioxide causes warming.

Don’t lose your thoughts on this process as I continue.

It also seems that this same kind of deceit and misrepresentation is being used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) in publishing claims about warming air temperatures globally.

According to Realclimatescience.com, NOAA collects air temperature data from over 1,200 locations globally. What we are learning is that when it comes time to report data, sometimes more than one half the stations don’t bother. No problem! NOAA simply makes up the data, claiming they “make adjustments” as they receive the data. Problem is they don’t always get any data, and it appears they don’t really care.

An NOAA graph showing actual measured temperatures, versus “adjusted” air temperatures, looks like this:

It is important to recognize that if you were to migrate the two colored lines closer and closer to approaching being on top of each other, we see that the paths of the graphs are identical. In other words, the “adjustments” were crafted to make it appear that from the beginning of the measuring process until the more recent time period, warming is becoming greater. How convenient.

Recall what I wrote earlier about “researchers” no longer actually measuring air temperatures, but instead collecting and measuring oxygen and carbon dioxide? Oddly enough, it just so happens that adjustments that NOAA makes to their temperature data coincide exactly with the amount of carbon dioxide they claim to have collected.

Powerline Blog’s John Hinderaker gives readers a look at how NOAA fudged their data (adjustments) for Auburn, Maine to show one location where such manipulation makes it appear as though in the past 15 years or so, global warming has really accelerated.

In a graph that looks eerily like the one shown above, we can see that the green line is what NOAA says is the average yearly temperature. The black line is “measured” air temperature and the blue line is what the new graph looks like after “adjustments,” i.e. fabricated data. Once again, take notice that if you move the blue line up the chart it almost magically looks just like the black line – only early on in the history of measuring, the blue line indicates it was much colder than the actual measured or yearly average temperatures indicate.

Fraud! It’s a scam! It’s a criminal enterprise when you consider the billions of dollars being earned promoting this nonsense. Why are these people not locked up in jail? Oh, wait. I know. They are all part of the rigged system. It’s for the very same reason that we get drawn into what is presented as crimes by politicians, yet never any prosecutions. RIGGED.

According to this guy, politicians who were very outspoken and supportive of “Climate Change” got voted out of the election process. Nothing is presented to substantiate his claim of such other than names and how they stood on climate changer. Maybe, maybe not.

I do know that this writer is far more optimistic as to why voters voted the way they did. He writes, “There is no evidence humans are on the verge of suffering from catastrophic man-caused climate change. Voters know it, and that’s why they sent a clear message to Democrats and Republicans in the midterms: Stop putting the interests of left-wing environmental radicals before those of working families — and if you do, do so at your own peril.”

I’m simply not convinced that there are that many voters that understand the real, honest-to-goodness scientific process that can produce real honest results. I wish there were.

Perhaps the only hope is that with more and more people presenting more and more evidence of FRAUD that is costing them financially and in the loss of freedom, more people will begin to “get it.”

Yes, Climate Change is a scam. Scientifically, it is impossible to happen unless it is being done deliberately by men, i.e. our own government. The purpose of the promotion of Climate Change in this context is to rob us of more of our money. What happens when the Government and the Global Power mongers have taken all our money?

They will come for us and kill us in so many ways we can’t comprehend.