October 18, 2019

How Much of the Internet is Fake?

Let’s answer that question with more questions. How much of this existence is fake? Why should we believe an article found on the fake internet isn’t fake?

This article, linked to from Drudge, is mostly rooted in faking all things on the internet for the purpose of lying, cheating, and stealing in order for some sinister “fakers” to make gobs of money. So what else is new?

The article states: “Some [malware infected computer bots] were sent to browse the internet to gather tracking cookies from other websites, just as a human visitor would have done through regular behavior. Fake people with fake cookies and fake social-media accounts, fake-moving their fake cursors, fake-clicking on fake websites — the fraudsters had essentially created a simulacrum of the internet, where the only real things were the ads.”

While all of this is disturbing, in the realm of our existing automatized culture of a hungry, non-thinking people, what difference does it make except for those thinking they are making money from the Internet when in reality, like Federal Reserve Notes, they are being conned?

The users don’t care. They see what they want, hear what they want, and repeat what they want. They may mouth that the Internet is fake, but that doesn’t stop them from jumping all in, gobbling it up as though it was life’s blood.

The “Catch-22” or circular thinking that is going on here is as ridiculous as the concept of everything being fake. Are we to believe, just in the same fashion that we do now, that because an Internet magazine media source reports what’s fake and what’s not, we are to disregard all other information and believe them? How does any of this make sense.

Such actions and reactions are creeping up on a “Clockwork Orange” kind of programming utilizing shock therapy to correct the behaviors of people, only the shock therapy isn’t as outwardly obvious. For those who haven’t figured it out yet, the shock therapy to brainwash the masses has been going on for a long, long time. As a matter of fact, it started in the Garden of Eden.

From all of this, we are left with this bit of nonsense based in a lack of understanding of the real reason the Internet is being used against us…the people: “What’s gone from the internet, after all, isn’t “truth,” but trust: the sense that the people and things we encounter are what they represent themselves to be. Years of metrics-driven growth, lucrative manipulative systems, and unregulated platform marketplaces, have created an environment where it makes more sense to be fake online — to be disingenuous and cynical, to lie and cheat, to misrepresent and distort — than it does to be real. Fixing that would require cultural and political reform in Silicon Valley and around the world, but it’s our only choice. Otherwise we’ll all end up on the bot internet of fake people, fake clicks, fake sites, and fake computers, where the only real thing is the ads.”

I’m in no position to disagree with the theory that all this stuff online is fake. It’s the solution that bugs me. The suggestion is that a cure requires “cultural and political reform.” It is precisely “cultural and political reform” that has driven us to this point of distrust “to be disingenuous and cynical, to lie and cheat, to misrepresent and distort…”

The only way of controlling the people is to ensure their division – their distrust of all except those who are doing the controlling. Government authority, or more accurately, the Global Power Structure fears the Internet because it can be a platform for truth. In it’s “unregulated” form the onus should be on the readers to decipher fact and fiction, but who’s left that wants to do that? The author of the piece intimates that the Internet needs more regulation, regulation that comes from the Global Power Structure that is doing all it can to make and keep the Internet “fake.”

Cultural and political reform, by design, has brought our very cultural to the pinnacle of distrust. By all indications, that’s exactly where “they” want us to remain. Therefore, why should we expect or even want cultural and political reform other than what we have been programmed to do?

We are caught in the web of circular following. While some can see the web they don’t understand how we got in. Without that knowledge, there is no way out.

Go ahead. Go look to Facebook for your answers. Maybe this time you’ll get something that is real but I wouldn’t hold my breath.

Share

Hide the Decline Has Become Create an Incline

*Note* – A regular reader of this website sent me all the links and information to compile this report. I am thankful for his help. (TKR)

The other day we discovered that “researchers” had published text in the journal Nature stating what they claimed showed that ocean temperatures were warmer than first estimated until a critic and mathematician questioned the margin of error published as part of their findings.

The authors subsequently began to walk back their findings but still claimed that the ocean temperature was still much warmer than original predictions indicated.

To understand this, one has to understand the fraudulent scientism and outcome-based, corrupted “scientific process” these criminal scammers are using. The authors of the fudged article claim: “Much of the data on ocean temperatures currently relies on the Argo array, robotic devices that float at different depths. The program, which started in 2000, has gaps in coverage.

By comparison, Keeling and Laure Resplandy, a researcher at Princeton University’s Environmental Institute who co-authored the report, calculated heat based on the amount of oxygen and carbon dioxide rising off the ocean, filling round glass flasks with air collected at research stations around the globe.”

In case you failed to understand what this is saying, let me see if I can help. No longer are these clowns actually measuring the temperature of the ocean water or the air for that matter. Instead, they are collecting oxygen and carbon dioxide and then calculating what they want the temperature of the water/air to be to fit their fraudulent theory. If you accept this false premise and scientific fraud, it means that you are a promoter and a “True Believer” of the false claim that carbon dioxide causes warming.

Don’t lose your thoughts on this process as I continue.

It also seems that this same kind of deceit and misrepresentation is being used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) in publishing claims about warming air temperatures globally.

According to Realclimatescience.com, NOAA collects air temperature data from over 1,200 locations globally. What we are learning is that when it comes time to report data, sometimes more than one half the stations don’t bother. No problem! NOAA simply makes up the data, claiming they “make adjustments” as they receive the data. Problem is they don’t always get any data, and it appears they don’t really care.

An NOAA graph showing actual measured temperatures, versus “adjusted” air temperatures, looks like this:

It is important to recognize that if you were to migrate the two colored lines closer and closer to approaching being on top of each other, we see that the paths of the graphs are identical. In other words, the “adjustments” were crafted to make it appear that from the beginning of the measuring process until the more recent time period, warming is becoming greater. How convenient.

Recall what I wrote earlier about “researchers” no longer actually measuring air temperatures, but instead collecting and measuring oxygen and carbon dioxide? Oddly enough, it just so happens that adjustments that NOAA makes to their temperature data coincide exactly with the amount of carbon dioxide they claim to have collected.

Powerline Blog’s John Hinderaker gives readers a look at how NOAA fudged their data (adjustments) for Auburn, Maine to show one location where such manipulation makes it appear as though in the past 15 years or so, global warming has really accelerated.

In a graph that looks eerily like the one shown above, we can see that the green line is what NOAA says is the average yearly temperature. The black line is “measured” air temperature and the blue line is what the new graph looks like after “adjustments,” i.e. fabricated data. Once again, take notice that if you move the blue line up the chart it almost magically looks just like the black line – only early on in the history of measuring, the blue line indicates it was much colder than the actual measured or yearly average temperatures indicate.

Fraud! It’s a scam! It’s a criminal enterprise when you consider the billions of dollars being earned promoting this nonsense. Why are these people not locked up in jail? Oh, wait. I know. They are all part of the rigged system. It’s for the very same reason that we get drawn into what is presented as crimes by politicians, yet never any prosecutions. RIGGED.

According to this guy, politicians who were very outspoken and supportive of “Climate Change” got voted out of the election process. Nothing is presented to substantiate his claim of such other than names and how they stood on climate changer. Maybe, maybe not.

I do know that this writer is far more optimistic as to why voters voted the way they did. He writes, “There is no evidence humans are on the verge of suffering from catastrophic man-caused climate change. Voters know it, and that’s why they sent a clear message to Democrats and Republicans in the midterms: Stop putting the interests of left-wing environmental radicals before those of working families — and if you do, do so at your own peril.”

I’m simply not convinced that there are that many voters that understand the real, honest-to-goodness scientific process that can produce real honest results. I wish there were.

Perhaps the only hope is that with more and more people presenting more and more evidence of FRAUD that is costing them financially and in the loss of freedom, more people will begin to “get it.”

Yes, Climate Change is a scam. Scientifically, it is impossible to happen unless it is being done deliberately by men, i.e. our own government. The purpose of the promotion of Climate Change in this context is to rob us of more of our money. What happens when the Government and the Global Power mongers have taken all our money?

They will come for us and kill us in so many ways we can’t comprehend.

Share

In Effort to Promote Global Warming, Scientists Screwed Up on Ocean Warming

Researchers with UC San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography and Princeton University recently walked back scientific findings published last month that showed oceans have been heating up dramatically faster than previously thought as a result of climate change.

“Our error margins are too big now to really weigh in on the precise amount of warming that’s going on in the ocean,” Keeling said. “We really muffed the error margins.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

Environmentalists to Pay Chevron Millions for Fraud

*Editor’s Note* – More than likely this is a case of one man or group of men stepping outside the guidelines of what the Global Power Structure would allow in their “fake” assault against oil companies using the “fake” tool of Climate Change.

Nothing is real!!

“Oil companies are under increasing pressure in the United States as various states, cities and municipalities attempt to hold select companies responsible for damage from natural disasters.

“The lawsuits claim the oil companies are contributing to climate change, in turn contributing to more severe damage from weather events such as (sic) hurricanes and storms.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

Thirty Years Of The James Hansen Clown Show

A reader sent me the link to this website, The Deplorable Climate Science Blog. This article about the antics of NASA’s James Hansen, “Father of Climate Change Awareness” proved to be a collection of real information that shows the “Clown Show.” As a matter of fact, the entire website looks to be worthy of a bookmark and a resource of some pretty good information.
Share

Scientism, Encapsulation, Abstraction, Interface at Work

After publishing yesterday’s article on science modeling fraud, we are treated to an example of the process at work. Two Swedish “scientists” are charged with and found guilty of “scientific misconduct” because supposedly one of the scientists intentionally fabricated data and didn’t properly obtain necessary permits to “experiment” on fish. In addition, if you follow this link you will find many comments about the finding that further supports my claims about the brainwashing in place that makes “modeling” so effective. Whether you agree or disagree, try to get beyond that mindset in order to see the political blinders that just seem to persist at all levels and in everything we do.

As to the corrupt modeling process, clearly, it matters not to all those involved, including those offering comments, the topic of the research and if the claims made are factual or not and to what extent the corruption exists. There is little reason anymore to think that fraud and corruption aren’t deeply rooted in a rigged system.

The supposed “results” of this published study claimed that tiny particles of plastics in ocean waters were harmful to fish. Because to the corrupted rigged system, we don’t know if the intent of the research was to falsely provide “evidence” that this plastic existed and the harm it causes to fish for political purposes and monetary gain. On the other hand, there is no reason to believe that the charges brought against the researchers are not being done for other political purposes or monetary gain.

That’s how terribly corrupt the entire process has become. One person commented that they just assume that all published papers today are rooted in fraud and deception.

Nice!

Share

Al Gore’s “Energy Hog” House Devours up to 34 Times More Energy Than the Typical U.S. Home

Press Release from the National Center for Public Policy Research:

Star of Green Documentary An Inconvenient Sequel “Has Done Little to Prove His Commitment to the Cause in his Own Life”

Power Bills Show Gore Leading Double Life of Preaching Sacrifice to Others While Indulging Himself

Nashville, TN / Washington, D.C. – Al Gore’s Nashville estate devoured more than 21 times the amount of electricity than the average American household over the past year.  A National Center for Public Policy Research report on energy use at the property of the former vice president portrays Gore as a hypocrite who demands others sacrifice for his green zealotry while he enjoys energy without apparent care for cost or capacity.

Gore’s An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power environmental documentary debuts nationwide this Friday.

 Key findings of the National Center’s “Al Gore’s Inconvenient Reality” report, which draws on data obtained from the Nashville Electric Service (NES), include:

  • The 10,070-square-foot 20-room mansion, pool and security gate on Gore’s 2.09-acre estate outside Nashville used 230,889 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity during the last 12 months.  According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the typical American household uses just 10,812 kWh a year.

  • In September of 2016 alone, Gore’s estate guzzled 30,993 kWh of electricity – an amount more than 34 times the national monthly average.

  • Al Gore’s average annual power consumption at his Nashville home was a staggering 21.3 times more than the average American.  He also owns two other homes not included in this report.
  • The former vice president burns through more electricity to heat his pool each year than the average U.S. home uses in six years.

  • The 33 solar panels Gore installed on his home produce only 5.7 percent of the energy his home consumes annually.

  • With an average consumption of 22.9 kWh per square foot over the past year, Gore’s home classifies as an “energy hog” under standards developed by Energy Vanguard – a company specializing in energy efficiency methods.

“Al Gore has attained a near-mythical status for his frenzied efforts to propagandize global warming,” said National Center Senior Fellow Drew Johnson, the author of the report.  “At the same time, Gore has done little to prove his commitment to the cause in his own life. I’m not sure he even believes what he’s saying.”

“While Gore encourages people throughout the world to reduce their carbon footprint and make drastic changes to cut energy consumption, Gore’s own home electricity use has hypocritically increased to more than 21 times the national average the past year with no sign of slowing down,” Johnson said.

Electricity for Gore’s home, pool and security gate comes from NES and is largely derived from coal and nuclear power – with just 3.2 percent generated by wind and solar alternatives.

Gore’s behavior conflicts with behaviors he suggests others follow.  On the website for his documentary, people are urged to “lower your carbon footprint” and advocate for renewable energy use.  It asks people to sign a “ Pledge to #BeInconvenient” that commits them to “switch my home… to 100% renewable energy,” persuade others “to pursue climate solutions” and buy tickets to his documentary.

“Like most sequels, Al Gore’s documentary and his lifestyle choices don’t live up to expectations,” said National Center President David A. Ridenour.  “Al Gore is asking Americans to make expensive and uncomfortable changes to adhere to his green goals, yet his electricity bills show he does not live the way he wants to impose on others.  He can’t just talk the talk – he must walk the walk.  And he has now failed at that twice.”

This is the second time Gore’s conspicuous consumption of power has been exposed.  In 2007, Johnson – then president of the Tennessee Center for Policy Research – reported that Gore used over 220,000 kWh of electricity a year at the same property. This led Gore to install solar panels, a costly geothermal heating system and other alleged energy-saving home improvements.  Despite these renovations, his 2016-2017 electricity consumption is over 10,000 kWh more than a decade ago.

The National Center for Public Policy Research, founded in 1982, is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank.  Ninety-four percent of its support comes from individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations.  It receives over 350,000 individual contributions a year from over 60,000 active recent contributors.  Sign up for email updates here.  Follow us on Twitter at @NationalCenter for general announcements.  To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by National Center staff, follow our media appearances Twitter account at @NCPPRMedia.

 

Share

There Is No Validity In What Is Being Sold as “Climate Change” or “Global Warming”

[pdf-embedder url=”http://tomremington.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf”]
Share

Inventor Of Fraudulent Temperature ‘Hockey Stick’ Is Humiliated In Canadian Court

Penn State climate scientist, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann commits contempt of court in the ‘climate science trial of the century.’ Prominent alarmist shockingly defies judge and refuses to surrender data for open court examination. Only possible outcome: Mann’s humiliation, defeat and likely criminal investigation in the U.S.<<<Read More>>>
Share

The Climate Confederacy

After President Trump rejected the Paris Climate treaty, which had never been ratified by the Senate, the European Union announced that it would work with a climate confederacy of secessionist states. Scotland and Norway’s environmental ministers have mentioned a focus on individual American states. And the secessionist governments of California, New York and Washington have announced that they will unilaterally and illegally enter into a foreign treaty rejected by the President of the United States.

The Constitution is very clear about this. “No state shall enter into any treaty.” Governor Cuomo of New York has been equally clear. “New York State is committed to meeting the standards set forth in the Paris Accord regardless of Washington’s irresponsible actions.”

Cuomo’s statement conveniently comes in French, Chinese and Russian translations.

“It is a little bold to talk about the China-California partnership as though we were a separate nation, but we are a separate nation,” Governor Brown of California announced.

In an interview with the Huffington Post, the radical leftist described California as “a real nation-state”. <<<Read More>>>

Share