March 30, 2020

The Radical Insanity of Climate Change

Below is a press release from the chair of the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. It is a prime example of the perverse insanity that has gripped much of this society, misleading us into nonsensical acts of idiocy in the false belief that the mere existence of man is causing the climate to change to the extent that we’re all gonna die.

By the way, this IS YOUR tax dollars at work. Is this what you really want? Do you have any idea at all what this plan to make all our public lands carbon neutral by 2040 means? Of course you don’t.

Take note of who the chair of the House Committee has selected as guest speakers for this event. It shows the radicalism and insanity.

Chair Grijalva, Committee Democrats to Introduce Landmark Climate Change Legislation Slashing Emissions From Public Lands and Waters

Washington D.C. – Chair Raúl M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.) and several members of the Natural Resources Committee will lead a press conference at 12:00 p.m. Eastern time on Tuesday, Dec. 10, to unveil their flagship legislation to fight the climate crisis. Members will discuss the legislation’s importance and describe the path it provides to end our public lands’ and waters’ contribution to climate change by 2040.

The landmark bill – authored by Grijalva and cosponsored by a team of Committee members – is the culmination of a year of hearings, roundtables, public forums and other public outreach efforts to learn more about how best to tackle climate change. Since taking the House majority, Natural Resources Committee Democrats have spent much of the past year tackling climate change from every angle.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, climate-harming emissions from public lands account for nearly a quarter of the U.S. total. The new bill seeks to reduce that figure while simultaneously promoting positive climate actions so that the total net contribution of public lands to greenhouse gas emissions is zero by 2040.

In February, the Committee kicked off a historic month of climate change hearings to hear from impacted communities, launched an online platform to hear from the American people about how climate change has impacted them, and held 22 hearings in 2019 focused on climate change to hear from experts, community members, Indian Country, scientists, and advocates.

The feedback gathered through these efforts has consistently underscored the urgent need to limit climate pollution as soon as possible, and to help impacted communities adapt quickly.

The bill is endorsed by multiple stakeholders and public interest advocacy groups, who will provide remarks at the press conference. 

Where: 1334 Longworth House Office Building

When: 12 p.m. Eastern time on Tuesday, Dec. 10

Speakers 

Chair Raúl M. Grijalva

Vice-Chair Deb Haaland (D-N.M.)

Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.)

Chase Huntley, The Wilderness Society

Marissa Knodel, Earthjustice

Aaron Mintzes, Earthworks 

Sharon Buccino, Natural Resources Defense Council

The press conference will be livestreamed on the Natural Resources Committee Facebook Page.

Press Contact

Monica Sanchez, (202) 225-6065

Share

Climate Change Ruined Maine’s Deer Harvest?

Did the real-time deer tagging counter break down? What happened to the excitement that the media and the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife’s (MDIFW) head deer biologist were spouting about how Maine was on track to harvest 30,000+ deer?

I’m guessing it’s because global warming Climate Change turned things across the state to a state of unfavorable hunting conditions. Parts of Maine saw record low temperatures three different times. There was also snow….Wait, what? Snow? That’s a big plus for deer hunting. Harvest rates always increase when it snows. Doesn’t it?

I don’t know about the rest of the state but the hunting conditions the last week of the season were atrocious…at best. There was snow, but it was always loud, crunchy snow to walk in. It was also so cold, any time spent in a stand or blind were short-lived. Who could take it?

Dang that global warming Climate Change!

I was sent an old newspaper clipping the other day. The headline read: “UN Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked.” The newspaper was dated June 29, 1989. The opening paragraph said, “…entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.”

So that’s what happened.

I wasn’t the only one that got cold hunting. My hunting buddies regularly beat feet to warm camps, cars, and houses cutting short what would have normally been all day excursions in the woods looking for that elusive buck.

On Saturday morning past – last day of regular firearms season – I was standing in the middle of a small hardwood ridge hoping some really stupid deer would make a terrible mistake and disregard the overwhelming noise of crunching snow and ice under foot. I was with two other friends who were at least several hundred yards from me, and I could clearly hear their crunch, crunch, crunch echoing over hill and dale.

Certainly, this global warming Climate Change must have contributed to what looks to be another poor year for deer hunting.

And I thought that it would be poor management, a post normal society that’s all mixed up, and resulting lack of interest that would essentially put an end to hunting. Instead, we’ll all be under water because it will be so warm with a planet void of ice. Maine must have been one of those “nations” that was destroyed (while I slept). So where am I exactly???

Gee! I wished global warming would hurry up and happen. I for one would like a bit warmer weather to hunt in and I could save money by not needing to winter in Florida.

MDIFW, bailed out again due to (wink-wink) global warming Climate Change.

Share

Combatting The Climate Crisis???

Crisis: “a time of intense difficulty, trouble, or danger.”

A Press Release from the House Natural Resources Committee:

Washington D.C. – Today Chair Raúl M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.) led a Committee markup to advance key Natural Resources priorities, including four bills that protect 1.3 million acres of wilderness in California and Colorado. The bills’ passage is the most recent step in the Committee’s ongoing efforts to protect public lands, promote access for all Americans and combat the climate crisis.

Following the markup, Natural Resources Democrats released the first edition of their new Climate Solutions series on Medium. The first post focuses on how conservation and protecting wilderness can help fight the climate crisis by naturally storing carbon, protecting clean water resources, and preserving intact ecosystems from destruction. Scientists around the globe have called for theprotection of land in order the keep Earth habitable for future generations of human and non-human species.

Bill texts, amendments, amendments in the nature of a substitute, and vote counts can be found at the House of Representatives Committee Repository at https://bit.ly/35lIGLX

Markup action on the bills approved can viewed at https://bit.ly/2O6rVhX

The scheduled vote on Rep. Derek Kilmer’s (D-Wash.) H.R. 2642, the Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, was postponed due to time constraints. The Natural Resources Committee intends to advance H.R. 2642 next month.

Bills Approved by the Committee

H.R. 1708 (Rep. Schiff), To adjust the boundary of the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area to include the Rim of the Valley Corridor, and for other purposes. “Rim of the Valley Corridor Preservation Act.”

H.R. 2199 (Rep. Carbajal), To designate certain federal land in the State of California as wilderness, and for other purposes. “Central Coast Heritage Protection Act.” 

H.R. 2215 (Rep. Chu), To establish as a unit of the National Park System the San Gabriel National Recreation Area in the State of California, and for other purposes. “San Gabriel Mountains Foothills and Rivers Protection Act.”

H.R. 2250 (Rep. Huffman), To provide for restoration, economic development, recreation, and conservation on Federal lands in Northern California, and for other purposes. “Northwest California Wilderness, Recreation, and Working Forests Act.”

H.R. 2546 (Rep. DeGette), To designate certain lands in the State of Colorado as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. “Colorado Wilderness Act of 2019.” 

H.R. 2854 (Rep. Velázquez), To amend the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 to prohibit the use of neonicotinoids in a National Wildlife Refuge, and for other purposes.“Protect Our Refuges Act of 2019.”

S. 216 (Sen. Cantwell), To provide for equitable compensation to the Spokane Tribe of Indians of the Spokane Reservation for the use of tribal land for the production of hydropower by the Grand Coulee Dam, and for other purposes. “Spokane Tribe of Indians of the Spokane Reservation Equitable Compensation Act.”

H.R. 307 (Rep. Hice), To provide for partnerships among State and local governments, regional entities, and the private sector to preserve, conserve, and enhance the visitor experience at nationally significant battlefields of the American Revolution, War of 1812, and Civil War, and for other purposes. “Preserving America’s Battlefields Act.”

H.R. 3794 (Rep. Gosar), To promote the development of renewable energy on public lands, and for other purposes. “Public Land Renewable Energy Development Act of 2019.”

Press Contact

Monica Sanchez, (202) 225-6065

Share

The Not So Brilliant Criminal U.S. Senate

Unanimously…Let me write that one more time…UNANIMOUSLY. The U.S. Senate voted unanimously to pass the Reviving America’s Scenic Byways Act of 2019 promoted as a means of encouraging tourism and getting people out DRIVING on these roads sucking up the scenery and spending a dollar or twenty.

This is the same criminal U.S. Senate that is determined to promote a false man-caused global warming, caused, they say, because too many people drive cars too much. (Members of the Senate are excluded.)

How can this pass the straight face test? How can these lying, cheating, worthless morons, in one breath condemn us all to hell because we create too much carbon dioxide while schlepping for votes in another upcoming election, promote and encourage more people to get behind the wheels of their gas guzzling SUVs (isn’t that what everybody drives?) because the Senate says it’s a good thing?

Lying Bastards!!!!!!!!!

But, hey! Why shouldn’t you

DON’T GO LOOK!

You never have before and probably never will. Keep casting a ballot. Insanity tells you next time you’ll get a good one.

Share

Government Gang Bangers and Insanity

I was listening to a conversation the other day about why people say disparaging remarks about obese and unhealthy people and why the comments aren’t directed “toward the system that created fat people.”

Good point.

Also included somewhere in that conversation was the question of what was the origin of the term “gangbuster.”

Webster puts it simply as: “one engaged in the aggressive breakup of organized criminal gangs.” Members of these “criminal gangs” are called gang bangers.

The U.S. Government is both gangbusters and gang bangers. A gang banger is described by Webster as: “bully, gangsta, gangster, goon, gorilla, hood, hoodlum, hooligan, mobster, mug, plug-ugly, punk, roughneck, rowdy, ruffian, thug, tough, toughie”

The U.S. Government will “agressive(ly) breakup” any one or group that opposes them or stands in the way of their own criminal agendas…even taking on murders and assassinations to accomplish their tasks.

And yet, in the same moment of existence, while destroying any perceived competing “gang bangers” the U.S. Government practices all the fine arts of being gang busters, as given in examples above.

An example of this can be found in the Government’s aggressive position on Global Warming. It has been discussed by some members of the U.S. Government (members of Congress) that anyone who denies that Global Warming is real, should be charged as a criminal and punished accordingly. It appears that presidential candidate Bernie Sanders believes gas executives should be criminally prosecuted for the damages they have caused because of the claims that fossil fuels cause Global Warming: Government bullying (gang banging) at its finest.

But, there’s more to Government gang bangers and their gang busters when it comes to Global Warming. Part of what permits Government Gang Bangers to bully the people into compliance with any of their draconian, people-controlling laws and punishments for non compliance, is our own insanity.

Here’s an example of this. The other day I was sent a link to a story about Global Warming from a reader. It was about a Netflix program where the narrator used old U.S. Fish and Wildlife footage of walruses “jumping off” cliffs and placed the cause as due to Global Warming.

According to the article I was reading, the narrator of the program said that: “…walruses have been driven to suicidal falls from rugged cliffs because there is no more ice for them.”

The footage that was fraudulently used to control people’s emotions (gang banging) was film that showed polar bears rushing walruses forcing them over the cliffs, much in the same fashion as some predators do with their prey species.

The existence of any form of “Global Warming” will always be a contentious and debatable event…by design. It can be argued that the theory of Global Warming is insane, but is that where the insanity exists?

The real insanity is that a recognizable media person announces that walruses are committing suicide, jumping off cliffs, because there is no more ice. The completion of that insanity is that millions of people believe the statement.

Isn’t the real insanity in all of this that people actually believe that a walrus, or any animal for that matter, can reason the desire or need to want to die for any reason? It is insanity to project human emotions and reasoning, or lack thereof, onto animals.

Because people are insane, a part of an insane society, is it any wonder that U.S. Government gang bangers are busily at work being criminal thugs in order to do whatever it is they intend to do?

An example of when the Scriptures tell us that in the Last Days He will send “Strong Delusion” on those not out of focus with Yahweh’s Word.

Share

Some Environmentalists Say…

I was recently accused, if that’s the word, of “broad-brush stroking” when making a comment about how “Environmentalists” want to control every aspect of our lives through senseless (no, seriously) regulation to a point now that it has become serious over-regulation.

So, fearing that someone who identifies as an “Environmentalist” might accuse me of lumping all environmentalists into the same cauldron of stewing rotten meat, let me say that SOME environmentalists (and yes, probably SOME on the RIGHT and SOME on the LEFT and SOME in the MIDDLE) have a very peculiar form of circular thinking (actually it is lack of thinking otherwise they wouldn’t be so stupid to be making certain statements and accusations) especially when it comes to how hunting causes so many “bad” things to happen.

I have been known to state that those who perpetuate the myth of Global Warming, that is, in the sense in which they attempt to sell it, have a very similar form of circular reasoning as SOME do when it comes to the effects of hunting.

We know, because we listen (for some unknown reason) to those who blame Global Warming on everything…yes, EVERYTHING, that Global Warming causes both hot and cold…sometimes at the same time. Global Warming is the cause of anything any believer would like to blame it on. Hunting isn’t all that much different from the perspective of a circular thinking environmentalist and/or an animal rights advocate.

Many dinosaurs have gone extinct because Cave Men hunted them to extinction. In the more modern era, buffalo went extinct because man hunted them. Caribou are going extinct because man hunted them. Elk had to be reintroduced because man hunted them to near extinction. Mountain lions, we are told, have gone extinct in many portions of the U.S. because man hunted them. Gray wolves, red wolves, Mexican wolves, wolf wolves all went extinct because man hunted them. Pick a species…any species and some Environmentalist will tell you it went extinct because man hunted them (whether they did or not).

However, to SOME environmentalists, hunting also causes certain populations of animal species to “compensate” for losses caused by hunting. So which is it? If hunting causes species to go extinct, how can hunting also cause species to grow to numbers too big? Like Global Warming causes hot and cold, floods and droughts, wealth and poverty, hunting evidently will cause both extinction and compensatory replenishment.

How convenient!!!

Share

Climate Change: The Sky Is Falling…Again

In case you hadn’t figured it out…yet…Climate Change is a Left vs. Right thing. Why is that? Well, you see…er…um…actually never mind.

But, here we go again. One more time someone takes the time to show anyone interested that Climate Change, as sold to a gullible, brainless, society, makes no sense.

What isn’t discussed, because you’d be labeled a member of the tinfoil hat club, is that Climate Change is the excuse the government wants to destroy/control whomever they wish.

Let’s back up a moment. The question might be how did this society get to a point where they insist on believing in the theory of Climate Change (as presented by the government et. al.)? A society must be prepped in order that they accept this premise regardless of whether or not the proposed results are actually achievable.

Through careful planning, an entity, such as the American Government which already wields extraordinary power over a people, when presenting a theory of global warming, must first begin by blaming this event on the people. This is the guilt factor.

Once established, and believed/accepted, that because we live in a modern era, we are causing global warming, we are then shamed for our behavior.

With guilt and shame in full destructive mode, it is a snap to instill fear in everyone. With a scared society, anything is possible.

Now that our society is scared of the effects of Climate Change, riddled with guilt and shame because it is our fault, we are primed to accept virtually anything as being the result of Climate Change. And here we are!

In the article linked to above, we see an example of how Climate Change has lowered the water level of the Great Lakes, followed by how Climate Change has caused the water level in the Great Lakes to rise – an example of the irrational fear that pervades this society.

Why might the government, or perhaps more accurately the Global Power Structure, insist on Climate Change? All that is ever discussed, but on a limited basis, is that the government pushes Climate Change for money. Government makes no bones about the fact they want to tax carbon – something the government has convinced us is a major cause of Climate Change. They also will need to tax everyone more money to fight Climate Change, much in the same way as we have been taxed for decades to fight poverty, education, drugs, etc. (How are those wars going?)

What is not discussed is how technology has become a cause, not a cure, of this so-called war on Climate Change.

I remember when Secretary of Defense, William Cohen, under Bill Clinton, told a joint session of Congress, back in the 1990s, that the United States has the technology to manipulate the weather/climate. This, of course, was related to the use of such technology as a weapon of war.

Where do you suppose this technology is some 25 years later?

If you might agree that our government is corrupt and capable of many sinister acts to punish and control the people (please go read historic accounts), doesn’t it make some sense that if they were to perpetuate Climate Change and blame every weather phenomenon on man-caused (guilt, shame, fear) Climate Change, it would give them a great cover for when they use technology against us?

If any kind of Climate Change exists, it is the government-caused weather manipulations foisted on a fearful society willing to do what they can in order to abate the guilt and shame of their acts of how they live.

And on it goes!

Share

Still Pushing “Climate Change” As Effecting Winter Ticks. Changing Propaganda?

It is incredibly insane listening to and reading the idiots who insist on spreading the lie that Climate Change is the cause for an increased presence of winter ticks which consequently are killing moose by sucking them dry of blood.

For years now, brain-dead scientismists have beat their propaganda drums that due to “lack of cold winters and ample snow” winter ticks are thriving and killing moose. Their premise has been that northern states, like Maine, because of warmer winters was not killing the ticks. Ignorance and the need to promote a false, non-existence of “Climate Change” (in the context that it is being promoted) failed to understand the complete life cycle of the tick and to what severity of cold, snow, and the right conditions needed to actually limit the number of ticks.

But that hasn’t stopped them from their money-making promotions of “Climate Change.”

From news out of Canada, a report falsely claims that global warming is the cause of moose mortality in Maine and other Northeast States as well as Canada. However, this time around, perhaps motivated by the fact that nobody is buying the B.S. that the lack of “normal” cold winters and snow are causing the ticks to thrive (people are looking out their windows and seeing 3-feet of snow and below zero temperatures in mid-November), they’ve decided to change their propaganda (lies) to approach the manipulation from a slightly different use of words (such as changing global warming to climate change): “…that tick is a parasite that’s given more time to find a host. Moose are just exposed to this potential parasite load for a longer period of time.” (emboldening added) There is never any consideration that the simple fact that too many moose perpetuate the growth and distribution of the winter tick.

Because, evidently, the lack of cold and snow (which isn’t happening on a regular basis) isn’t working out to substantiate their false claims of global warming they now are promoting that due to a warming climate ticks have a longer period of time to find a host moose to ride on for the winter and such them clean of blood.

What’s amazing is these clowns spend all of their “research” time (wink-wink) trying to figure out what’s happening to the moose because of the tick (by using someone else’s data) and nobody is interested in studying the actual tick. The only information being used about the tick is nonsense spread from one half-baked scientismist to another and repeated en masse and eagerly by an irresponsible, enabling, and lazy Media.

Evidently the authors of this propaganda piece didn’t bother to ask those in Maine conducting moose studies, or they didn’t want to because it might upset their agendas, otherwise, they would have found that Maine’s biologists are suggesting that the seemingly unprecedented spread of winter ticks is caused simply by the presence of too many moose.

But, there is no money in finding solutions and there is far more money in perpetuating “Climate Change.”

What’s most sad is the fact that truth and reality are being suppressed due to the perpetuation of the false myths about global warming.

Share

Plio-Pleistocene decline of African megaherbivores: No evidence for ancient hominin impacts

WHAT? We can’t have this kind of stuff contaminating the convenient narrative that man is a piece of crap who only kills everything in sight!!!

If you are of the educational capacity of this editor, what that headline means is that a new study suggests that man wasn’t the cause of mass extinctions of now nonexistent big animals that once roamed Africa.

Science Magazine has access to information about the study (subscription required).

New Center Maine shares more information.

For example: “The animal decline might have instead been because of environmental factors such as declining atmospheric carbon dioxide and expansion of grasslands, researchers write.”

OH MY! GASP! SPUTTER! CRY, fall on the floor and bang your head. Is this “suggestion” suggesting that global cooling (decreased carbon dioxide) was the cause of mass animal extinction in Africa? If so, nothing makes any sense. If according to the Algorites, increased levels of carbon dioxide warm the planet and will eventually kill us all, then millions of years ago, according to the research being examined, a lack of carbon dioxide caused extinctions, then wouldn’t increased carbon dioxide, i.e. Global Warming, a.k.a. Climate Change be good for some animals and bad for others? Haven’t sensible scientists and observers been suggesting this since like forever?

And all of this without internal combustion engines and billions of people farting.

Isn’t carbon dioxide mostly a good thing?

According to the brilliance of man, no matter what happens to carbon dioxide surrounding this existence…wait for it… We’re All Gonna Die! – after some have made their millions/billions/trillions.

Then we become useless eaters and need exterminating.

 

 

Share

Hide the Decline Has Become Create an Incline

*Note* – A regular reader of this website sent me all the links and information to compile this report. I am thankful for his help. (TKR)

The other day we discovered that “researchers” had published text in the journal Nature stating what they claimed showed that ocean temperatures were warmer than first estimated until a critic and mathematician questioned the margin of error published as part of their findings.

The authors subsequently began to walk back their findings but still claimed that the ocean temperature was still much warmer than original predictions indicated.

To understand this, one has to understand the fraudulent scientism and outcome-based, corrupted “scientific process” these criminal scammers are using. The authors of the fudged article claim: “Much of the data on ocean temperatures currently relies on the Argo array, robotic devices that float at different depths. The program, which started in 2000, has gaps in coverage.

By comparison, Keeling and Laure Resplandy, a researcher at Princeton University’s Environmental Institute who co-authored the report, calculated heat based on the amount of oxygen and carbon dioxide rising off the ocean, filling round glass flasks with air collected at research stations around the globe.”

In case you failed to understand what this is saying, let me see if I can help. No longer are these clowns actually measuring the temperature of the ocean water or the air for that matter. Instead, they are collecting oxygen and carbon dioxide and then calculating what they want the temperature of the water/air to be to fit their fraudulent theory. If you accept this false premise and scientific fraud, it means that you are a promoter and a “True Believer” of the false claim that carbon dioxide causes warming.

Don’t lose your thoughts on this process as I continue.

It also seems that this same kind of deceit and misrepresentation is being used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) in publishing claims about warming air temperatures globally.

According to Realclimatescience.com, NOAA collects air temperature data from over 1,200 locations globally. What we are learning is that when it comes time to report data, sometimes more than one half the stations don’t bother. No problem! NOAA simply makes up the data, claiming they “make adjustments” as they receive the data. Problem is they don’t always get any data, and it appears they don’t really care.

An NOAA graph showing actual measured temperatures, versus “adjusted” air temperatures, looks like this:

It is important to recognize that if you were to migrate the two colored lines closer and closer to approaching being on top of each other, we see that the paths of the graphs are identical. In other words, the “adjustments” were crafted to make it appear that from the beginning of the measuring process until the more recent time period, warming is becoming greater. How convenient.

Recall what I wrote earlier about “researchers” no longer actually measuring air temperatures, but instead collecting and measuring oxygen and carbon dioxide? Oddly enough, it just so happens that adjustments that NOAA makes to their temperature data coincide exactly with the amount of carbon dioxide they claim to have collected.

Powerline Blog’s John Hinderaker gives readers a look at how NOAA fudged their data (adjustments) for Auburn, Maine to show one location where such manipulation makes it appear as though in the past 15 years or so, global warming has really accelerated.

In a graph that looks eerily like the one shown above, we can see that the green line is what NOAA says is the average yearly temperature. The black line is “measured” air temperature and the blue line is what the new graph looks like after “adjustments,” i.e. fabricated data. Once again, take notice that if you move the blue line up the chart it almost magically looks just like the black line – only early on in the history of measuring, the blue line indicates it was much colder than the actual measured or yearly average temperatures indicate.

Fraud! It’s a scam! It’s a criminal enterprise when you consider the billions of dollars being earned promoting this nonsense. Why are these people not locked up in jail? Oh, wait. I know. They are all part of the rigged system. It’s for the very same reason that we get drawn into what is presented as crimes by politicians, yet never any prosecutions. RIGGED.

According to this guy, politicians who were very outspoken and supportive of “Climate Change” got voted out of the election process. Nothing is presented to substantiate his claim of such other than names and how they stood on climate changer. Maybe, maybe not.

I do know that this writer is far more optimistic as to why voters voted the way they did. He writes, “There is no evidence humans are on the verge of suffering from catastrophic man-caused climate change. Voters know it, and that’s why they sent a clear message to Democrats and Republicans in the midterms: Stop putting the interests of left-wing environmental radicals before those of working families — and if you do, do so at your own peril.”

I’m simply not convinced that there are that many voters that understand the real, honest-to-goodness scientific process that can produce real honest results. I wish there were.

Perhaps the only hope is that with more and more people presenting more and more evidence of FRAUD that is costing them financially and in the loss of freedom, more people will begin to “get it.”

Yes, Climate Change is a scam. Scientifically, it is impossible to happen unless it is being done deliberately by men, i.e. our own government. The purpose of the promotion of Climate Change in this context is to rob us of more of our money. What happens when the Government and the Global Power mongers have taken all our money?

They will come for us and kill us in so many ways we can’t comprehend.

Share