July 11, 2020

EPA Finding: Emissions from Aircraft Creates Public Health Issue

*Editor’s Note* – It is such a farce that this totalitarian/fascist government, that uses draconian regulations, through the Environmental Protection Agency, to bleed the people dry of their hard-earned money and to regulate them out of existence, on a daily basis pollute our sky with chemical aerosol spraying, hidden behind the lie of “controlling the weather.” These fascist idiots have convinced the majority of the rest of the non thinking Americans that exhaust from airplanes contributes to “greenhouse gases” and thus promotes “climate change.” We already have been told by the fascists that “climate change” is a health risk and it’s going to eventually kill us all. And yet we ignorantly allow the government to regulate us to death, while turning up our noses at planes polluting the sky, and at the same time are ignorant to, or turn a blind eye to, the biggest polluter of the planet spraying us with chemicals on a daily, 24/7 basis – the United States Corporation.

But by all means, Don’t Look Up!

SUMMARY: In this action, the Administrator finds that elevated concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere endanger the public health and welfare of current and future generations within the meaning of section 231(a)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA, or Act). She makes this finding specifically with respect to the same six well-mixed greenhouse gases–carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride– that together were defined as the air pollution in the 2009 Endangerment Finding under section 202(a) of the CAA and that together constitute the primary cause of the climate change problem. The Administrator also finds that emissions of those six well-mixed greenhouse gases from certain classes of engines used in certain aircraft are contributing to the air pollution–the aggregate group of the same six greenhouse gases–that endangers public health and welfare under CAA section 231(a)(2)(A).<<<Read More>>>

Share

Thought for Discussion Today

Most people will concur that climate change is ongoing and a “natural” phenomenon. Too many people actually believe that climate change is man-caused and occurs mostly through the generation of carbon dioxide and other, so-called, greenhouse gases. Here is my thoughtful question which can be discussed in the comments section.

Environmentalists always portray the effects of a so-called warming planet in a negative light only. As it may pertain to animals, this same negative harping exists. Surely there are just as many positive results from global warming as there are negative, but they are seldom, if ever, discussed. Do you agree?

Share

Climate Change Legislation More Than Likely Will Come from Obama Executive Orders

In history, we learned that after long and difficult days, the Founding Fathers pounded out a constitution that when asked about the effort, Benjamin Franklin said that he and others had crafted a republic and added, “if we can keep it.” Progressivism soon began to morph a constitutional republic into a democracy as people began the mind set of totalitarianism, to a degree, that they didn’t like abiding by the rule of law and thus transitioned into a majority rule, which soon become something more closely resembling mob rule.

Congress has become a part of the elite ruling class, in total disrespect of the Constitution and even the majority of rule of a democracy, taking it upon themselves to make laws regardless of what the people, those supposedly represented, wanted.

And it hasn’t stopped there. Presidents don’t even care any longer about what Congress does, the separation of powers or the rule of law, and simply exercise, what they have come to so much abuse, executive powers. This has resulted in tyrannical rule.

President Obama certainly is not the inventor of executive orders but he has certainly done his share to bypass legislative process. And now we are already hearing that the President, after his Lie of the Union Address, wants to make the totalitarian charade of cap and trade/global warming a priority during his second term.

If we learn anything from history, can it be the metamorphosis from republic to despotic communism of the United States following the same path as all other historic events that ended this way?

Doubtful!

Share