If you believe that Justice Kavanaugh was being stocked by some deranged GUN CARRIER, and all the other “out of the blue” gun events, you are a complete idiot.
Time to fly!!!! I’ll be seeing you…somewhere…eventually.
Gun-Free Zones
February 27, 2020 by Leave a Comment
Is LaPierre The Tool To Destroy NRA?
December 19, 2019 by Leave a Comment
Most know that the NRA is a mess. There’s not a lot to read about this event and what there is one has to wonder how accurate it is. At one point in time, I commented on whether the actual function of the NRA was to incrementally destroy the Second Amendment’s historic application or to bring in an insider who will bring down the organization and put an end to the false efforts of supporting the Second Amendment as millions of seriously misled blind followers have done for years.
The more this boil festers the more it appears, to me anyway, that Wayne LaPierre’s anointed role as dictator of the NRA is to completely destroy it. A corrupt government, led by a liar claiming his support for the Second Amendment, who, as part of his own whittling away of the Second Amendment for the purpose of easing any threats from the masses against increased dictatorial rule, perhaps now perceives their Hegelian manipulations of incrementally destroying a person’s “privilege” to keep and bear arms, isn’t enough. The purpose then is to destroy all quasi-government organizations used to slowly destroy a person’s right to protection. What better way to start than with the NRA.
I have claimed for years that the ONLY obstacle preventing this Satanic, diabolical, corrupt vain show of immorality from complete take over of freedoms and false freedoms of the people, is the existence of privately owned guns.
I’m beginning to believe that LaPierre is the inside tool to make that happen. A question to ask is whether this display of insanity in the Congress, labeled an impeachment hearing, is the fabricated distraction needed to get better traction by the New York attorney general, to destroy the NRA? – or to get other totalitarian laws passed, like the reauthorization of the National Defense Act. Gee, I wonder what Congress passed in that this year?
Believe what you will. All or none of this may be true. However, who has considered what will happen WHEN the U.S. Government declares ownership of all weapons against their laws? Do you really think people will silently turn in their weapons and assimilate?
Perhaps the Hegelian solution will be far greater than planned for…or not!
Consider the Dangers of “Red Flag” Laws
August 16, 2019 by Leave a Comment
The hot topic these days, prompted by repeated staged gun shooting events, is what is called “Red Flag” laws. Red flag laws are essentially laws enacted that gives power to some named authorities to attempt to predict what they think a person MIGHT do that would become a danger to society or the person in question. In the case of red flag gun laws, the issue is whether or not a person is mentally ill and might pose a threat to themselves or others.
Consider the dangers.
First, such red flag laws, bastardize due process of law as well as removes the long held principle that a person is presumed innocent until a bonafide court of law determines guilt. American society today, bolstered by fascists and promoted by ignorant totalitarians have lost all sensibility when it comes to the protection of their presumed rights and government allotted freedoms. This action contributes to their own insanity and thus we are left with a bunch of people, most of whom are mentally challenged themselves, calling out for insanity in another person who chooses not to live the mainstream lifestyle of insanity, instead selecting their own methods of insane existence. So, who is right? The one with the power right?
As was pointed out yesterday by a reader of this website, we now have entered the extremely dangerous ground of enacting laws based upon what we think a person might do based on their state of mind. If a person is, in fact insane (which aren’t we all by someone’s standards?) is that person capable of recognizing mental incapabilities in other people? Because a person doesn’t live as I, does that make them insane? In this insane world it certainly does.
I don’t consider myself insane, but I know for a fact there are some (perhaps a lot) who think I have some serious mental deficiencies if not just unusual ways of looking at things, mostly because of my spiritual beliefs.
I was watching a movie the other night trying to relax after a physically demanding day, in which one of the actors in the movie stated that ANYONE who believed in God suffered from a mental disorder.
If a law enforcement person (and need I have to remind readers that not all law enforcement personnel are capable of putting behind them their personal perspectives on such things as religion, politics, etc. in their decision making processes?) chooses to think me mentally ill because of the hours I spend each day studying the Scriptures to show myself approved unto my CREATOR, can that law officer then bring me before a “medical professional” of his/her choice with like perspectives, rendering me doomed to the fascist, rigged system?
Because anger and hatred have been purposefully bred into our society, is there really any comfort to be had that none of this anger and hatred (insanity) is being injected into the rigged system of granted power to incarcerate a person and take their property from them simply because they think differently or because they are a republican and not a democrat?
When an honest assessment of life in these United States shows us the repeated death threats and threats of bodily harm and other assorted insane and perverse things, because these events are becoming more and more of routine acceptance as part of a dysfunctional society, from what basis are we beginning our assessment in attempting to determine the mental capacity of any individual who happens to possess “dangerous weapons?”
Throughout history we have read and sometimes witnessed attempts by powerful organizations to somehow control a person’s right of thought. How does anyone control another persons thoughts? Short of a “Clockwork Orange” concept, perhaps technology is not that far away from accomplishing that task but in the meantime, perhaps the best way to tread into the pits of hell is to enact laws that give somebody power to guess what another person might do based on their character, political association, sexual orientation, education, or lack thereof, color of skin, outward appearance, religious background or affiliation…there is no end. Is this what we want?
It is a terrible thing when anyone, for any reason, chooses to kill other people. If, as has been pointed out by some in the media, the acts of violence in our society are increasing, then perhaps it is more a reflection of a society with a rapidly shrinking moral base, a Godless society absent any knowledge of what is decent and not, rather than one in need of laws that attempt to determine a person’s thoughts or the possibilities of what they might do based solely on the perspectives of brainwashed authorities.
If we dare allow ourselves to let our minds run a bit wild, consider some of the possibilities an accepted “red flag” existence might render. With fully enacted and accepted “red flag” laws a normal part of society, then it would only make sense that such actions become the defense in a court of law for a legitimate reason one person killed another person – yes, your honor, I shot and killed that person because I believed, because I knew they were a mental patient and an active republican, they were going to kill me if I didn’t kill them. (I learned this on Facebook)
Of course nobody wants to even consider these possibilities but they are very real. That’s how progressivism works. With such perverted insanity becoming the “normal” in a forward moving society, sanity would tell us that by enacting “red flag” laws we are making things even worse and crafting a societal stage of reckless permissiveness based on nothing but fear, anger, and hatred.
Where will this insanity end? This is the epitome of the fox tending the chicken coup – the insane determining insanity.
Forgive them Father. They know not what they do.
NRA, Immigration, and Political Campaigns
August 8, 2019 by Leave a Comment
It was actually Winston Churchill who first said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” History proves the man took advantage of every crisis and/or took part in the creation of such crises. It was later, during the Obama Administration, that President Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel, unoriginally stated, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that [is] it’s an opportunity to do things that you think you could not before.”
Hegel’s Dialectics is a method of controlling and manipulating the masses by essentially fabricating a “crisis” in order that it can be taken advantage of, i.e “to do things that you think you could not before.” The Dialectic is in three parts – fabricate a crisis, embellish that crisis, offer a solution to the crisis, i.e. “never let a good crisis go to waste.” The solution is what was desired in the first place.
What most people are in denial about is that the U.S. Government, a most corrupt corporate organization, MUST control all aspects of our lives in order that it can exist. Along with all aspects of our lives, government wants to disarm the citizenry. Presidents come and presidents go and with them live and die their lies and false promises. Trump is an example of the typical lying, cheating, stealing politician, while at the same time doing as the controller of his puppet strings tells him to.
Before Trump became president, he strongly supported, then president, Bill Clinton’s assault weapons ban. But running for office he presented himself as a supporter of gun rights, among other things, and lied and made false promises all the way to the White House.
The most egregious act, the real barometer of what kind of idiot Trump is, came when he declared that we should simply go take people’s property from them for no apparent reason other than fear, and worry about due process later. His words fell on the selective hearing loss ears of the blind followers of this man’s lies and promises. We will never learn.
The only way any government, even those strongly supported by non-governmental organizations, can take away and destroy the rights of people, including those rights which originally were considered unalienable, is to do it incrementally and systematically. An all out assault and immediate taking away of the right to keep and bear arms would create a crisis so large even the “expert” purveyors of Hegel’s Dialectic could not manage the outcome. Thus it must be done slowly and methodically. This is what we see going on right in front of our noses.
At present we see the fallout from fabricated crises, all happening at the same time. There is the made up immigration problem, the orchestrated mass shootings, the embellished issues with the NRA, and a federal election just one year away. What a better opportunity to play false crises one against another to accomplish the third part of the Dialectic.
Nothing is ever coincidental. It is not simply a coincidence that with a new party take over of the House of Representatives, the takeover consisting of those most vocal about taking away Second Amendment privileges, that with the loud calls for “gun control” we see more events of mass shootings.
(Note: There are increasing inherent dangers in numerous uses of the Hegelian Dialectic. For the “never let a good crisis go to waste” to be effective, each successive crisis must be bigger and scarier to have the desired effect on the masses of circus goers.)
Of course the mass shootings have to be connected to immigration – a “twofor” if you will, playing one against the other. At the same time, with the NRA in “crisis,” real or imagined, the opportunity is in prime time to win more of the Bread and Circus goers over to increased gun control.
Real or imagined, the NRA is perceived by far too many people, as being the most powerful supporter of gun rights – is the cup half full or half empty. Because the Dialectic has been in play for so long, the slow and distinct gnawing away of gun rights occurs with each passing false flag “crisis.” The real function of the NRA is to control the bleeding, never to stop the action that causes the wound. The NRA, therefore, is part of the controlled opposition and never the opposition.
With the passing of time, a fabricated crisis weakens and is soon forgotten…that is if left alone. The Washington Post is running a headline claiming a mass shooting every 47 days. For mass shootings to continue to be an effective means of perpetuating the crisis in search of a result, look for that number to continue to drop and become more frequent and with each orchestrated event becoming more horrific.
Death, blood, and guts grabs the attention of the masses. Once you have their attention then talk can be implemented as part of the embellishment of the false crisis. This embellishment works perfectly with stirring up the calls for “there ought to be a law.” Congress is happy to oblige…after all, isn’t that the reason for the crisis?
With a country rapidly giving away its freedoms, all in the name of security, what remains is a suppressed existence even more needy of government than before the fabricated crisis – a position government wants us to be in.
Whether the NRA is being systematically destroyed in order to deliver the needed support to the complete repeal of the Second Amendment, or is purposefully being brought to a weakened state in order to increase the chances of implementing more gun control, remains to be seen.
Regardless, Hegel’s Dialectic is a powerful and useful to government tool that allows government to increase their control over a free country. Once the freedoms are gone, there is little left for the masses except those occasional nights out at the “circuses” and the bread crumbs for sustenance.
Guns: And The Divide Grows
May 30, 2019 by Leave a Comment
I wonder how many, if any, ask themselves how a people can be so toxically divided and full of anger and hatred? For any who have entertained such thoughts, have you ever thought perhaps this is an orchestrated event? That’s right. It’s not something this is just happening. It’s something that is intended to happen. Besides the anger and hatred that continues to consume and divide this nation, I’m not exactly sure the reason for its intention beyond divide and conquer.
It was only a few years ago – I know some must remember – that any candidate for the U.S. Congress (either houses) and the presidency dared not suggest gun control. It was an undisputed formula for defeat.
Our post-normal existence has turned 180 degrees to where we see candidate Joe “The Groper” Biden declaring gun control and that he will “defeat” the NRA. (Historical Note: Who remembers when presidential candidate Edmund Muskie shed a tear because people were dragging his wife through the political knothole? That tear destroyed his run for the presidency. Today, we have a known woman groper, an acclaimed socialist, a homosexual, etc. etc. running for president and nobody blinks an eye. Tell me nothing has changed.)
However, Biden’s intent to “defeat” the NRA is that he will propose legislation the NRA opposes and he thinks he can pass it. I was kind of wondering if Biden was intending to “defeat,” as in get rid of the NRA. Maybe doing so wouldn’t be such a bad idea. While some believe the NRA is the greatest thing since spandex, I see the NRA as not much more than an organization that is slowly demolishing my right to self protection rather than those people and organizations attempting to do it all at once. Maybe it’s time to call out the real Second Amendment supporters and tell the NRA to kiss my behind.
But, back to the topic at hand. The divide continues and is growing at breakneck speed. It seems that anything that will cause more anger and rage directed at opposing “sides” (ideology) is the name of the game.
The situations that exist are so well crafted that ideology is unshakeable. With false beliefs securely grounded into individual psyches, plans have shifted away from creating two sides and the focus has become how to grow that divide.
Another example is one that we can find infiltrating even the tiniest of micro-villages in the depths of Western Maine. The Board of Selectmen of the Town of Paris voted unanimously to declare the town a Second Amendment sanctuary city.
Yes, such a move is only symbolic but certainly the mindsets are such that it causes the anger and hatred to grow. In the article we can read that the head of the Maine Immigrant’s Rights Coalition thinks the idea of declaring a Second Amendment sanctuary city, “is to create fear and conflict.”
He also claims that immigration sanctuary cities, designed to disregard immigration laws of this country and Second Amendment sanctuary cities, designed to send a message that communities believe in the unalienable right to self protection and the right to keep and bear arms, are not the same. Any comparison “is cynical and dangerous.”
The only way any person can see that one declaration is “cynical and dangerous” and the other is not, is if they have been completely brainwashed. Misguided and crafted anger and hatred funneled into blinded and ignorant understandings that a complete disregard for law and order pertaining to immigration laws is somehow acceptable and those wishing to protect the guarantees of the Bill of Rights is “cynical and dangerous” show just how cynical and dangerous things have become.
Back in the days when candidates for political office understood the dangers of threatening one’s constitutional and unalienable rights, a certain degree of caution, perhaps respect(?), existed. No longer. It’s all out war. The animosity, hostility, and antagonism that rules our society blinds us to the point we are incapable of comprehending our own foolishness causing failure to decipher whether differences exist or caring if they do.
How sad.
Oregon Wants Your Guns And To Make You A Criminal
April 5, 2019 by Leave a Comment
It’s coming! I’ve predicted it in the past. It’s only a matter of time when the blinded totalitarians, under the spell of fascism, will have all your guns rendering you helpless to counter the tyrannical rule and death already planned for you.
The State of Oregon is deciding on a bill, that among a warehouse full of anti-gun measures, includes one that would make the owner of a stolen gun accountable should that gun be used to commit a crime. That’s right. Welcome to the Soviet Union of American Totalitarian States. And not only that, but if you legally sell a gun to someone else and that gun somehow ends up in the hands of a person who commits a crime, you will go to jail.
In my mind there seems to be a catch. However, I’m quite confident that if this is not added to the bill before a final vote, it will be only a matter of a short time when another law will be passed that will require (make mandatory) the registration of ALL guns.
It is impossible to enforce the law proposed to make gun owners liable for crime if a gun is stolen or lost, unless that weapon(s) is registered with the state. How else can they trace the weapon? Unless, of course, you are dumb enough to report it stolen or lost, complete with serial number, etc.
As I understand this proposed bill, gun owners would be given 72 hours to report a lost or stolen gun. This reporting MIGHT release them from liability. However, there are so many complicated scenarios that a person might be brought up on charges for, chances are you will be charged with a crime anyway. The goal here is to criminalize you and/or get you to get rid of all your guns…FEAR!!!
If you have already “registered” your weapon, you really are left with no choices. Registered weapons do not necessarily fall under the formal act of filing a form of gun ownership. If you purchased your gun through a licensed gun dealer, your gun is registered. If you bought your gun with a credit/debit card (Mark of the Beast/Image of the Beast) your gun is registered. If you bought ammunition with a credit/debit card, essentially you have alerted the state that you own a gun of that caliber. It’s nearly impossible to get around it.
My advice to you is that if you own guns that were passed down or you bought in a private sale, do your best to hide that fact from anyone.
The fascists are going to get your guns. It’s only a matter of when.
Charge on oh totalitarian imbeciles!!!
A Bag of Rocks comes to mind.
While You Were Sleeping, Congress Further Destroyed Your Second Amendment Rights
March 1, 2019 by Leave a Comment
AND YOU LOVE IT!!!!
Quietly and with little fanfare, the U.S. Congress stuck a knife in the back of all Americans, something the lying, cheating, bastards do on a regular basis, and stole away even more of your right to own a gun and buy and sell, or even loan a gun. Congress passed HR 8.
We can thank radical progressive totalitarians for this action, an action that was prompted by a government so corrupt for so long few even have enough wherewithal left in them to recognize it. But, it’s not just the progressives to blame. Blame must also be made on those fake claimers who say they are Second Amendment supporters. These are the ignorant fools who are the useless eaters who enable the far Left by supporting “reasonable” destruction of the Second Amendment. How many gun rights advocates (wink-wink) support “Universal Background Checks?” Yeah, check em off. Millions! Rome burns and your water bucket is riddled with holes.
Well, now they have those “reasonable” limits in the form of “Universal Background Checks.”
What HR 8 means in short is that nobody can buy or sell without having the mark of the beast. That’s right. The mark of the beast consists of first obtaining a background check. Keep in mind that you and I have absolutely no control over a background check or the information contained in that check that determines whether or not we “qualify” to buy or sell a gun.
Just wait!
If I want to sell a gun to someone, I must, according to the beast, pay a fee to have a government licensed, government controlled seller first run a background check on the buyer and the seller(?).
There is only one way this can be enforced. The government must keep a registration of all firearms. How else would they even know, until perhaps after a crime was committed using an illegally sold or stolen gun when they checked the serial number, that a gun had changed hands.
What most don’t know and/or choose not to believe is that the U.S. Government ALREADY has a registration of every firearm that has ever been sold by a licensed seller in recent years. What they don’t have, and what they really want, are the serial numbers attached to a person’s name of all those guns that have existed for a long, long time and have never been registered. How else can they confiscate them all when the time comes? HR 8 helps to accomplish that task. (Think about what powers the president has been given through the Defense Authorization Act when a National Emergency has been declared. Oh, wait. I forget. You’ve never read that have you. Probably never heard of it either.)
But the biggest question of all is just exactly what is this going to do to prevent all those violent crimes scared servants are fearful of? The answer is it is going to do nothing except further prohibit anyone from honestly owning a gun and having the ability to do with it as one pleases.
Supporters of these “Universal Background Checks” buy into all the lies and false promises made about how you can “gift” a gun to a family member or loan one to a friend for hunting, while choosing to disregard the fact that government, yes, your filthy, disgusting, dirty, rotten, lying, cheating, stealing, government, controls every aspect of your ability to own and/or sell a firearm. This makes them tyrants. Tyrants I said, and the very reason the Second Amendment was crafted was to make sure no tyrannical government can ever turn you and I into the slaves we have become. Too late now!
But you don’t see that do you. If you did, we wouldn’t be to the point we are now.
I hope you continue to enjoy your slavery to YOUR tyrannical fascist government. After all, this is all “reasonable” isn’t it?
Oh, by the way. The link above will take you to the text of HR 8. But I know you won’t even take 10 minutes to read it because you don’t care. You either support it blindly or reject it blindly. So, what else is new.
SHEEP! Baaaaaah…Baaaaaaah…Baaaaaaaah
“Red Flag” Laws Are More Than Asking a Judge to be Clairvoyant
February 4, 2019 by Leave a Comment
David Trahan, executive director of the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine (SAM), writes in his latest column that “Red Flag Laws” ask our judges to be clairvoyant, to predict what someone might do if they had a gun in their possession.
The issue here is that when someone deems, from their own perspective, that a person might be a danger to themselves or to other people, should have their constitutional rights – in this case the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms – taken away from them forever or until such time as a judge or others think that right should be restored.
What can possibly go wrong?
The mindset in this post normal society of immorality and social decadence, is that a person is incapable of being responsible for their actions. While this may be partly true when comparing times of the past with those of the future, such irrational thinking is based upon fear and ignorance.
Where once people minded their own damned business, today the trend is to get into the face and affairs of others, especially when another person is operating from a position of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness that disagrees with the accuser, i.e. that person willing to file a petition to have another person’s rights stolen from them.
Isn’t the biggest of all questions in this regard, who is going to become ruler of the chicken house? I’ve been around the block a time or two and there exists virtually nobody involved in politics/law enforcement (they go hand in hand), or even health and mental health professionals, who should be trusted to make any kind of judgement as to whether a person is deemed dangerous to themselves or to others, short of the obvious lunatic.
Trahan points out (in a different articles) that laws designed to steal a person’s Second Amendment rights are unique only to the Second Amendment where it is being required to take some kind of “competency” test before you can exercise a right. The argument is often that, in this case, a Second Amendment right can cause the death of a person. So what! Any honest person can tell you that all rights can, directly and indirectly result in bodily injury, mental injury, and sometimes death.
Guns are singled out and always have been. They are singled out because of the mind control and manipulation of all things in this totalitarian/fascist country to keep the masses scared to death, forcing them to call upon more government to keep them safe. The remarkable insanity of this approach is that people call upon the most corrupt and hypocritical organization that exists in the world today, to keep them safe and to protect them. It shows what a fantastic job these fascist bastards have done, when once we were taught that the purpose of the Second Amendment was to insure the tyrannical pond scum of governments would not take from us our rights.
Strong delusion prohibits people from seeing such a basic concept!
At the end of Trahan’s piece he writes: “One of the important lessons I have learned is that the underlying causes of domestic violence, mental health problems and suicide are far more complicated than just taking away a gun.
Furthermore, advocates know best how to address these issues. Instead of trying to find more sophisticated ways to justify a new law that runs counter to our fundamental constitutional rights, I suggest bringing these groups together, with lawmakers and state leaders, to examine these issues in a much more comprehensive and cooperative manner.
It seems like a better approach than relying on laws that ask judges and law enforcement to predict the future.
It is of political necessity for public servants to make statements about “bringing groups together,” but in reality, this post normal existence has moved far beyond any pragmatic approach to solve societal problems. Such approach always results in diminished rights.
So where does that leave us? Simple. Trahan already points out the existing laws that deal with those who choose to use violence. These so-called “Red Flag Laws” are a most dangerous act that places god-like responsibilities into the hands of some in whom I wouldn’t entrust the care of my chickens. Seriously! Do you want some scum-ball politician or incompetent, agenda-driven, crooked judge deciding what’s best for you?
Fear and ignorance of guns leaves a person with irrational hallucinations. And yet I recall the aftermath of the Boston Marathon when people lined the streets watching and applauding as law enforcement, without proper due process of the law, went door to door, sometime busting down doors, pointing weapons of mass destruction at innocent people, under the guise of looking for “terrorists.” This is what fear can do for you. That fear is so well engrained into the minds of the feckless masses, they fail to see the truth and importance of the protection of our existence through the total protection of our rights.
No person should be allowed, say nothing of granted, the authority to stand in judgement as to whether any person is a danger to themselves or others, let alone pretending they can predict the future.
The issue here is not the gun and never has been. To declare the gun the problem is as intelligent as saying lips are responsible for what a person says.
Until such time as this society is willing to address the real problems they have created through their decadence, perversion, and adiamorphicism, frantically and irrationally trying to find just one more LAW that will stop a gun from killing someone, it remains the epitome of craziness.
98% of Mass Shootings Happen In “Gun-Free” Zones
December 4, 2018 by Leave a Comment
By our count, the U.S. makes up 1.49 percent of the murders worldwide, 2.20 percent of the attacks, and less than 1.15 percent of the mass public shooters. All these are much less than America’s 4.6 percent share of the world population.
Most gunmen are smart enough to know that they can kill more people if they attack places where victims can’t defend themselves. That’s one reason why 98 percent of mass public shootings since 1950 have occurred in places where citizens are banned from having guns.<<<Read More>>>
