November 27, 2022

Day 84 – No Executive Orders


It is Day 84 and there is nothing posted on the White House website about Obama’s promised 23 executive orders. However we did get a preacher’s tongue-lashing of falsehoods and half-truths when Mr. Obama got all wee-weed up in Connecticut yesterday. While he was “ginned up” he accused anyone who opposes his tyrannical takeover of America, as getting all “ginned up” over his plans. A great example of the President intimating that the subjects should just shut up and follow him to hell…….one way!


Ban Those Magazines!

Gun rights destroyers say that if we were to ban high capacity magazines, perhaps fewer people would be killed in a mass shooting. A “high-capacity” magazine is one that holds many (over 10) rounds or bullets. A person carrying several loaded magazines, if the gun functions normally, can quickly and easily eject a spent magazine and inject a new, loaded magazine in a matter of 1-3 seconds, perhaps a second or two more for an inexperienced shooter.

According to what is written in an article by John Rosenberg at PJ Media, gun rights wreckers, as well as well-disguised, self-appointed “conservatives” ignorantly think that forcing a would-be mass assassin to have to reload a semi-automatic weapon a few more times would save lives.

Peggy Noonan of the Wall Street Journal, wrongly labeled a conservative, ignorantly says this about conjuring up an anti gun rights bill:

[I want] a quick, short, simple bill that would ban the use of big ugly monstrous high-capacity magazines [that would force shooters to] reload after seven or eight shots. It won’t hurt hunters, it won’t leave your house less safe, and in the cases of crazy people attacking children and mallgoers it will force them to reload, in which time someone might be able to knock them down or get the gun from their hands.

Hey, Peggy! Why not prevent this from even happening and allow a person to carry a firearm for protection?

Even at Sandy Hook, the media and others have perpetuated the myth that while Adam Lanza was trying to reload his gun, 11 children were able to escape. Lanza may have been trying to reload his gun but I can assure you it wasn’t because of time it would have taken to eject an empty clip and put in a loaded one. More than likely his weapon malfunctioned.

Ronsenberg does a good job of explaining why limits on magazines will accomplish nothing and the history exists to show so.

Oral Sex and Bloomberg’s Gun Banners

“Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” Michael “the Tyrant” Bloomberg and his posse of anti-gun, anti-rights mayors set a very poor example of one wishing to clean up the streets and end gun violence. James Schiliro, mayor of Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania, supposedly was drunk and disorderly in his own home and held a 20-year-old male hostage (with a gun?) until he had oral sex with him. At some point during his rage, he fired his gun into the floor. Gun? Gun? GUN? This hypocritical fascist has a gun?

It seems that others in Bloomberg’s brigade of tyrants have a difficult time adhering to the laws of the land. Background checks needed Mr. Bloomberg?

Uh oh! Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Guns members “being over 45 times more likely to be convicted of crimes than Florida concealed firearm license holders.”


Day 38 – No Executive Orders


Day 37 and Barack Obama has failed the American people. He lied and has yet to make public the details of his fake signing of 23 executive orders claiming he would control gun access and ban assault weapons. Nothing posted on the White House website regarding his executive orders on gun control.


Maine’s Gov. Paul LePage is expected to speak during his weekly radio address about gun rights and at the same time urge Congress to put its focus on mental health rather than lawful gun owners.

I’m still not sure what it will take to wake this nation up to the realities around them. Perhaps this bit of information will rattle a few of you awake.

According to an article written by Constitutional Attorney Michael Connelly, J.D., veterans are receiving notices from the government that they have been determined to be either physically and/or mentally “incompetent” to take care of personal affairs, including owning a gun. One such letter read, in part, as follows:

A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United States Code 924(a)(2).

Has our government merely disregarded any “due process” when it comes to life, liberty and property? Evidently. Is there no criteria, established by law, that a judge or jury can use in determining a person’s ability to fend for themselves and/or own a gun for protection and sport?

My God! WAKE UP!

Another article written by Jim Shepherd and posted on Outdoor Wire, delves into a bunch of “what ifs” as it might pertain to efforts to disarm Americans through rewording of laws to cloud the interpretation of those laws. In that article it states the following:

California already has legislation that allows police to confiscate any firearms owned by people once qualified for firearms ownership but subsequently disqualified. These two measures are only two of the most blatant attempts to make firearms illegal-and allow officials to legally seize them from their owners.

In case you think I’m exaggerating, California already seizes as many as 10,000 guns per year under their “once-qualified” provision.

California is believed by some to be the model or testing grounds used by the ruling class as to what they want to see the rest of the country like.