December 3, 2021

Ludwig von Mises on Marxist Socialism (Communism)

Ludwig von Mises said in 1951 what I have been trying to say about “planning”, “oversight” and other illegitimate options to the constitutional requirement of the payment of just compensation for the State’s exercise of Eminent Domain.

Whether the private property is land for the prairie chicken, or groundwater for the “common good”, central control abolishes private property ala the Communist Manifesto and as such violates prohibitions against communism.

On the nature of ownership:
“Regarded as a sociological category ownership appears as the power to use economic goods. An owner is he who disposes of an economic good.” Page 37.
“It is the aim of Socialism to transfer the means of production from the private ownership to the ownership of organized society, to the State.”
“If the State takes the power of disposal from the owner piecemeal, by extending its influence over production; if its power to determine what direction production shall take and what kind of production there shall be, is increased, then the owner is left at last with nothing except the empty name of ownership, and property has passed into the hands of the State.” Page 56, “Socialism, An Economic and Sociological Analysis”, von Mises, 1951, reprint 2009)

“It is fundamental that the Constitution is the paramount law of the state and cannot be altered by legislative enactment.” Jones v. Ross, 173 S.W.2d 1022, 1024 (Tex. 1943)

This is not rocket science.

Ludwig von Mises 1 001


What is Communism and Why Aren’t We Teaching Against It?

“Let the communistic attitude of central control (for the greater common good) get started with something that seems, or starts off, reasonable such as child safety on the farm, clean air, phony water scarcity, animal cruelty, endangered prairie chicken or you-name-it then we become infected with the virus of Communism that interferes with unfettered private control of property. In so many words, Marx called it the wresting away of the control of property by degrees. The one-way train trip to the concentration camps seems too remote right now to get people excited, but Hitler proved that the power to force people to do good is the same power to force people to do bad.” – Anonymous


The Insane Fantasies Of The Marxist EPA Laid Low By One Simple Chart

But if the EPA can stop just one extra molecule of the deadly toxin known as carbon dioxide from escaping into the atmosphere, the destruction of the American economy will be worth it!

Please note, of course, that the EPA won’t dare to speak out against the Earth’s most egregious polluter, China.<<<Read More>>>


EPA Wants To End Wood Stove Heat

“When these standards are fully implemented, EPA estimates that for every dollar spent to comply with these standards, the American public will see between $118 and $267 in health benefits,” it said. “Consumers will also see a monetary benefit from efficiency improvements in the new wood stoves, which use less wood to heat homes. The total health and economic benefits of the proposed standards are estimated to be at $1.8 (billion) to $2.4 billion annually.”<<<Read More>>>

Remember, it is probably the same idiots who calculated how much money we were going to save with Obamacare that are crunching these fake numbers for us. Don’t be fooled. The goal here, by the Marxist/Communist United States Government, is to put a stop to wood burning for heat. It’s all about scarcity and human control.


Obama is a Lying Snake

Visiting Mexico, the Liar in Chief, in a speech, told Mexicans that it is American guns that are responsible for Mexico’s violence. He didn’t want to mention to anyone about his “Fast and Furious” program, where this Marxist dictator was responsible for intentionally sending thousands of guns across the border in some scam covered by nonsense about tracking guns to see where they were coming from.

And even though the data show that guns used in Mexican violence that originate in the U.S. is a tiny percentage, the president continues to blatantly and deliberately lie about it. And yet it takes a foreign news agency to even indicate the guy lies.

Why does this guy get a free pass on his lying?


What The Hell Is Wrong With This Country?

Imagine that you are out on your property, and you are approached by three Police Officers, one of them armed with an assault rifle. They tell you that you are inconveniencing a large developer [who happens to give lots and lots of money to the Governor], and that you have to leave your own land. This is the same developer who has been willfully trespassing on, and vandalizing your and your neighbors properties for weeks, with no intervention from authorities.

It is a scene almost too terrible to contemplate…..

What would you do?<<<