July 8, 2020

Executive Order: Obama Declares National Emergency

From the White House:

Executive Order — “Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities”

EXECUTIVE ORDER

– – – – – – –

BLOCKING THE PROPERTY OF CERTAIN PERSONS ENGAGING IN

SIGNIFICANT MALICIOUS CYBER-ENABLED ACTIVITIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, find that the increasing prevalence and severity of malicious cyber-enabled activities originating from, or directed by persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.

Accordingly, I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(i) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, cyber-enabled activities originating from, or directed by persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States that are reasonably likely to result in, or have materially contributed to, a significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic health or financial stability of the United States and that have the purpose or effect of:

(A) harming, or otherwise significantly compromising the provision of services by, a computer or network of computers that support one or more entities in a critical infrastructure sector;

(B) significantly compromising the provision of services by one or more entities in a critical infrastructure sector;

(C) causing a significant disruption to the availability of a computer or network of computers; or

(D) causing a significant misappropriation of funds or economic resources, trade secrets, personal identifiers, or financial information for commercial or competitive advantage or private financial gain; or

(ii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State:

(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, the receipt or use for commercial or competitive advantage or private financial gain, or by a commercial entity, outside the United States of trade secrets misappropriated through cyber-enabled means, knowing they have been misappropriated, where the misappropriation of such trade secrets is reasonably likely to result in, or has materially contributed to, a significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic health or financial stability of the United States;

(B) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services in support of, any activity described in subsections (a)(i) or (a)(ii)(A) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order;

(C) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (a)(i) and (a)(ii)(A)-(C) of this section.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date of this order.

Sec. 2. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 1 of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 3. The prohibitions in section 1 of this order include but are not limited to:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 4. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1(a) of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States;

(d) the term “critical infrastructure sector” means any of the designated critical infrastructure sectors identified in Presidential Policy Directive 21; and

(e) the term “misappropriation” includes any taking or obtaining by improper means, without permission or consent, or under false pretenses.

Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1 of this order.

Sec. 8. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order.

Sec. 9. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 10. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
April 1, 2015.

Share

Is Claim Obama Wants Only Generals Who Will Kill Americans Real?

Unless you’re living in isolation, you should know by now that there are claims that President Obama is administering a new litmus test to his leading military personnel to determine, if asked to, would they follow orders from their superiors and kill American citizens. The claim seems to have originated in an interview with Dr. James Garrow, touted as being a one-time Nobel Peace nominee, I believe now living in Toronto, Canada. Garrow claims, in the 21-minute video below, that his source, described as being a legend among Americans, wishes to remain anonymous but at the same time requested Garrow to go public with his information.

Continuing with my own belief that the ultimate goal of Obama and the global ruling class is to create enough distrust and anger among and between the American citizens to drive them into the streets in violent protest in order that the president can declare a “national emergency”, I have valid reasons to be suspicious and skeptical of what Dr. Garrow is saying.

If I am wrong, rightfully, Americans should be shocked and outraged that any commander in chief would seek such a litmus test to determine the leadership capabilities of his generals.

Consider my concerns:

1. Obama seeks to become a dictator in order to force his ideology onto Americans to prepare for a one world government in which the United States becomes an also ran. In combination of historic bills passed in Congress, dating back many years and the number of power grabbing bills and executive orders signed into law during Obama’s first four years, the stage is properly set that once a “national emergency” is declared, the sitting president becomes a dictator. Is this reason enough to find ways of angering the masses and driving them into the streets?

2. In the video, Dr. Garrow states that he has “worked with the Catholic Church”. In that role he was on the board of Crisis Magazine, a Catholic publication whose function was the “standing by Catholic tradition and letting it animate ideas and action in the temporal order.” Pay attention in the video to the list of names in which Dr. Garrow says his work on Crisis Magazine allowed him to “meet”; Zbigniew Brzezinski is on that list. The Catholic Church wants the U.S. disarmed as well. Oddly enough, there is not a lot on the Internet about Dr. Garrow and his past.

Also note that at the end of this video, Garrow evokes the name of god. Those of knowledge understand that the use of such tactics can be meant to deceive. Garrow was the founder of the Bethune Institute, an establishment created to honor Dr. Norman Bethune, who after traveling to Russia to study their system of health care, became a committed communist, eventually carrying out his communist work in China. Dr. Garrow is actively working in China through a program called Pink Pagoda, so save girls doomed for infanticide. Garrow points out that China wishes very strongly that the American citizenry is stripped of their weapons for much the same reasons as the emperor of Japan was at the onset of their attack on Pearl Harbor.

3. Garrow specifically declares that he thinks the intentions of the Obama Administration, supported by his conversation with his source, is to kickoff a civil war. He says that if Americans really knew what was going on they would be preparing for a civil war and that Obama has been really surprised at the amount of resistance there has been to his gun grab proposals. He states that America is now better prepared to rise up against Obama. Is he inciting this action or warning us it is the plan?

4. Many of the keywords and phrases used in this video are used to incite emotions in people. Every possible anti Obama talking point is brought up in this interview; never any agreement and always polarity.

5. If this “legend of the American people” is such a legend and has so much concern for the American people against a despotic ruler, then why the need to hide behind an anonymous identity? And Garrow states that he doesn’t believe his source will come forward. Consider for a moment. Someone, claimed in this video, achieved the highest rank in the U.S. military, believes that Obama plans to kill Americans in order to fulfill his dreams of progressive socialism, and he chooses to remain anonymous. This is so outrageous. If this is true, then impeachment proceedings on Obama should begin immediately and stop hiding behind some imaginary wall of safety while Americans may be at risk for their lives. If this is true, then a “legend among Americans” would certainly give the claim credibility or at least give people a chance to scrutinize the source. Makes no sense.

6. Pay attention in the video because it is brought out that this information that Obama has a new litmus test doesn’t come from Garrow’s anonymous “hero” source, but a third party. Red flag?

7. Garrow says the message that needs to go out to military personnel is they don’t need to resign commissions but to stand firm and wait and see what happens. Really?

I may be wrong. I am still sticking with my contention that all this rancorous debate of guns and executive orders is intended to anger the American people. Don’t get me wrong. I believe Obama and his totalitarian buddies want to disarm the American people but I also think he knows he’s not going to get it done with gun control laws and executive orders. Through a national emergency, resulting in his dictatorial rule, he believes he then will TAKE arms away from the public and thus the need to find out if his generals will do that. Or, he may not need his own generals at all. There’s always NATO and the UN.

What you may be seeing in this video is, in fact, the future plan that you and I are going to be subjected to and the purpose of this video, complete with the story of an “anonymous” source, a “legend among Americans”, is nothing more than a tool to be used to lead us like cattle down that path. Think before you get the cattle prod.

You watch the video, do some serious research and decide for yourself.

Share