September 28, 2020

Chemical Aerosol Spraying to Save the Earth While Sacrificing Billions of People

ChemTrailI doubt that I can convince anybody new of the ideas that: Chemical aerosol spraying is ongoing and has been for some time; Anthropogenic global warming is nothing more than a theory; That to some saving the earth is more important than the inhabitants of the planet.

Look up! For crying out loud LOOK UP! It’s right there in front of you. Learn the truth about how condensation trails are formed and then ask yourself if those trails will last all day long. Also do some research to discover the increase in metals and other chemicals in our plants and soil. I don’t think that stuff came up through the ground from China.

I am sympathetic to you if you actually firmly believe and are not interested in gaining better knowledge about man-caused global warming. To claim the science is settled is really no different than Hillary Clinton deciding which of her emails she considered personal and which ones we should be allowed to see.

Perhaps the toughest pill to swallow would be if I told you that regardless of the truth or fiction of any of this, there are those that are very much willing to kill you to save THEIR planet…ahem, save themselves.

According to quotes gleaned by the website Collective-Evolution, the BBC writes: “Schemes to tackle climate change could prove disastrous for billions of people, but might be required for the good of the planet, scientists say.”

Dr. Matthew Watson, a PhD and researcher in the department of Earth Sciences at the University of Bristol, says: “We are swimming, growing, in a sea of ignorance. This terrifies me. But doing nothing is not an option. Unless we’re very wrong about climate change or quickly change our ways, at some point we’re going to have to ‘go outside’ with these technologies.”

If nothing else consider this. This Dr. Watson admits that “we are swimming in ignorance” about global warming/climate change. He shows his own skepticism about the theories of man-caused climate change by suggesting that we might be “very wrong” about it. Yet, he eagerly suggests, even from a point of near panic, that we must DO SOMETHING even if it means destroying the atmosphere and killing billions of humans.

Other scientific studies, as linked to above from the BBC, claim that “schemes to tackle climate change could prove disastrous for BILLIONS of people” and Watson says that we can’t do nothing. And consider the last part of the BBC statement that says killing billions of people, “might be required FOR THE GOOD OF THE PLANET.”

There are two issues here that you, if you are capable, should consider. The first is this. You decide whether saving the planet, regardless of the truth or fiction about man-caused climate change is worth the lives of “billions of people.” To do this, you also must consider whether billions of people will die if “WE” do nothing. This, of course, requires honesty in one’s ability to think and reason and to be honest I don’t think it exists at any level where I would have confidence that enough people could do anything about it.

Personally, I don’t care what you think, but the second issue, if it doesn’t hit close enough to home, nothing ever will. If somebody is deciding that billions of people must be sacrificed to save the planet, convince yourself that you are NOT one of those billions of people. Go ahead!

If you cannot see the absurdity and the insanity of all of this, there is little hope that you would recognize anything based upon Truth. Can you? Will you? Do you even want to?

As I believe that I still have time on this planet and while here I need to find ways in which to support myself and my family, for those of you who are willing to “go outside” with this atmospheric chemical spraying to save Gaia, I’m selling aerosol cans filled with the same materials as they are spraying on us now from planes. It’s a home version and you can buy a case or more of it to help out those eager to kill billions of people to save the earth.

Directions are simple: Make sure all doors and windows are shut tight and commence spraying. Breathe deeply.

There’s also an outdoor version. Why wait for the shit to fall out of the sky? You can now get more of it around you more quickly by spraying inside and out.

Spray me! I want to live! Above anything else SAVE THE PLANET.

But I fully understand that, according to most, I have many screws loose. That is because you have been trained to piss on anyone who would disagree with the lies you believe. Conspiracy Theorists are a danger to society! Stamp them out now!

Share

Animal Worshipers May Die From Anthrax

My above title to this article should be as effective as the nonsense I read in a recent letter to the editor in the Kennebec Journal that came from a woman who once wanted to know why the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (MDIFW) killed so many crows that were destroying the eggs and small animals of endangered species.

In the most recent Letter to the Editor, this woman claims that bear cubs get caught in snares and chews its leg off to escape while the cub’s mother watches on in agony.

Beware of anthrax!

Share

I Can’t “Bear” The Nonsense!

Oh, please! Somebody save me from the onslaught of human ignorance, nonsense and general emotional clap trap!

Save Bears, an organization that seems to think much more of bears than humans, or at least think bears are humans, promote complete bear nonsense in order to get a better shot (no pun intended) at non thinkers’ bank accounts.

From Save Bears website, we find this:

savebears1

And so, according to these misled people, bears express emotions. And just how do they do that? Is it that you have to catch up with one in the forest and just ask them how they feel? Will they answer you? Give you a thumbs up or thumbs down? It has already been determined that the only way anyone can truly assess whether any animal can feel pain or “express emotion” is by being able to communicate intelligently with them.

Then there’s this:

savebears2

Bears are bright, that is as far as animals go, but fall short from being able to leap tall buildings in a single bound. Bears do have a remarkable sense of smell, as some studies seem to suggest a bear’s sense of smell is many times better than that of a bloodhound, but a bear doesn’t have X-ray vision, nor can he fly faster than a speeding bullet.

To state that a bear is “intelligent and quickly learn[s] from experience” is just a bit too foolish I’m thinking. If a bear is that smart then why do they keep coming back raiding dumpsters, trashing barbecue grills, busting down bird feeders, raiding garbage cans, tearing into cars, etc., only to get hauled away and released someplace? And if they are so damned intelligent, why do they find their way back to the same sites and then end up dead? Smart animal, cuddly too, and probably forgot to express some emotions, like the nonsensical ones on display by the not so intelligent bear lovers who don’t seem to learn any quicker than the bear.

Just nonsense!

savebears3

Share