October 21, 2019

Scientific Consensus is Fraud

Recently I shared with readers an article I found called, “Big Science is Broken.” As sometimes Media does, perhaps more articles are being written about the flaws of scientific “study” and “peer review,” sold to the public as “settled science” or “consensus science.” Both of those elements are dangerously fraudulent.

Today, “How ‘Settled Science’ Helped Create a Massive Public Health Crisis,” tells us that consensus in fraudulent, politically manipulated, people control, masquerading as science, can literally kill us.

The article states: “Leslie correctly points out that, despite the patina of pure objectivity, “scientific inquiry is prone to the eternal rules of human social life: deference to the charismatic, herding toward majority opinion, punishment for deviance, and intense discomfort with admitting to error.”

While that statement may be true, it is more of the gas for the vehicle intended to get the human population from Point A, a healthy lifestyle, to Point B, death.

We should cease with dancing around excuses as to why fraudulent science is killing us. Not everyone is that stupid, but unfortunately because, as the article states, social life, deference to the charismatic, herding, punishment, etc., are the known factors bred into human character that allows the Ruling Establishment, whose bent is massive elimination of millions of people, to carry out their plans.

When the Media focuses on issues that only scratch the surface, nothing is ever accomplished, except what most of us refuse to understand – that Media’s role in this is the perpetuation of the social life, deference to the charismatic, herding (brainwashing/propagandizing), and implementing punishments for non conformance. Anyone paying attention should realize that it has only been a matter of time that “science” tells us one thing, and “science” tells us they were wrong. We want to believe, and do believe, that the “correction” has delivered the truth, and yet it never is the truth…only more lies. It’s commonly referred to as insanity and we are too insane to recognize it.

The once-known “scientific method” exists, somewhere, but is rarely seen anymore. It has been replaced, by design, with everything, and more, that is described in the two linked-to articles above. Lost in all of it, is the truth that the lost method is being perpetrated on us by design and the bigger goal isn’t a healthier lifestyle. It is death by self-inflicted adherence to what some brainwashed quack is telling us to do.

Isaiah 53:6 – All we like sheep have gone astray: we have turned every one to his own way, and the Lord hath laid upon him the iniquity of us all.

Share

Destroying Second Amendment: Create Problem, Force Reaction, Offer Solution

ProblemReactionSolutionOne of the problems with the National Rifle Association, as with far too many Americans, is they buckle to nonsensical calls for “reasonable” limitations to a constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Yes, in District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court decided that it was a constitutional right of an American to keep and bear arms. However, in Justice Scalia’s majority opinion, he let it be known that the Court’s decision did not prohibit “reasonable” Second Amendment restrictions.

McDonald v. Chicago, had similar results and yet, how free are D.C. and Chicago residents to practice this right to keep and bear arms?

With the only deterrent left in this country to ward off tyranny and dictatorship, the necessary goal for this achievement must be the disarming of the people. It has been systematically at work for a long, long time, albeit slow, it is happening. At the present pace, and the willingness of too many people to place limits on their rights, what then does the future hold for what’s left of American freedom?

Any and all Second Amendment protection groups will never be able to truly address the disarming of Americans until they are willing to understand who is behind it and how it is being done. As brainwashed people, we don’t want to believe that “…we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” (Ephesians 6:12) (Global Power Structure)

The “principalities, powers, rulers of the darkness and spiritual wickedness in high places,” have a very simple formula for controlling people. These rulers have understood human nature for a very long time. They have made it their life’s work. They have understood for a very long time that, civilian gun ownership is a problem for world dominance and control. They also understand that they cannot simply bust in every door in America (yet) and take our guns. There has to be a way to do it in which, not only will people not recognize the effort, they will be eager to comply, to accelerate their own slavery, by believing what they think they are seeing, and heeding what they are told.

As I said, the formula is simple but difficult for blind people to see. First, the rulers create a problem. This is followed in a timely manner with getting the people to react emotionally to the problem. With emotions, especially fear, in place, the very same powers that created the problem, offer a solution.

Most people do not have much difficulty in accepting that there are people who act and react to frightening events in this country, because they believe the “problem” to be real. With fear firmly embedded, those with “solutions” go to work. These solutions are designed only to further the cause of disarmament.

The United States Government has never offered a “program” that was successful – meaning that it did not accomplish for the people what the Government told them it would do. It is successful, if only in tiny increments, to the ruling powers to achieve their long-term goals, i.e. disarmament.

All Government departments and programs are designed for failure and to ensure that the majority of citizens are always and forever dependent upon the same government.

What is most difficult for Americans to swallow, is any suggestion that our own government, the Shadow Government (Council on Foreign Relations) and all the members of the Global Power Structure, wanting us all disarmed, create the so-called “problem.”

When “problems” happen, like a cop shooting, school shooting, theater shooting and now even terrorist shootings, three entities go into action. On the one hand we have the brainwashed people, who have been conditioned to believe that any gun has the ability to kill at random. The mere presence of a gun scares the living daylight out of them. They are programmed to be scared and react accordingly. To go along conveniently with this programmed fear are groups, some of whom are useful idiots who believe what they have been told and will do anything to destroy their own liberties in the name of safety. Some of these groups are planned groups who work directly with the Global Power Structure to perpetuate the fear and the calling for “laws to be made.”

It matters not that laws already exist. These people are scared and are demanding SOMETHING to be done. This is when the Global Power Structure, who created the problem to begin with, steps in with another (final) solution. With each subsequent “problem,” and “reaction,” another “solution” is offered. There is no end to this.

Groups like the NRA, who claim to be defenders and supporters of the Second Amendment, do no such thing when they, not only go along with, but promote “reasonable” limits to the right to keep and bear arms.

Today I posted a link to an article telling of one South Carolina representative who is offering a bill that would require all “journalists” to have background checks and obtain a license to practice their First Amendment rights. Of course the point of the bill is to draw attention to the hypocrisy of the Media and others to take little regard at protecting a right to keep and bear arms, but who show their outrage at anyone suggesting messing with the First Amendment.

It no longer matters that any gun limitation laws will have zero effect on violent crime. Nobody wants to hear that criminals don’t obey laws. This is a product of years of mind control, through propaganda and brainwashing. Step by step, soon the country will be disarmed. The “rulers of darkness” and the “spiritual wickedness in high places,” will continue to create the problem, promote reactions, and then offer their solution. Failure to recognize this formula, will quickly result in the destruction of this nation. This formula is not endemic to only the disarmament of our country. It is at play within every aspect of politics, government and our private lives.

It is time for those who think they support the Second Amendment to step up and help expose the creators of the “problem.”

PROBLEM > REACTION > SOLUTION.

 

Share

Excuses Are Like………

This reminds me of the old story (I’ve used it countless times) of the guy who goes to his neighbor and asks to borrow his ax. The man says, “No, it’s Tuesday.”

The neighbor asks why Tuesday was important, to which the man replied, “If I don’t want you to borrow my ax, I guess one excuse is as good as another.”

The government wants to ban guns. I guess one excuse is as good as any to do that. This excuse is a bit more relevant when you consider that perhaps in their creation of fake “terror” attacks on the U.S., not only will they continue to instill fear in the populace but they can double-down on that fear and use it as an excuse to ban guns. Might I remind you why the government wants you to NOT have guns? It’s a threat to their tyrannical rule.

ISISContained

Share

Democrats singing same old song: Gun control and climate change

Sort of like the haze Obama apparently lives in, as evidenced by his speech last Sunday, which combined trite assertions that we are winning the war against terror (a hard message to sell with 14 Americans freshly slain at the hands of ISIS-inspired terrorists in California) with blatantly false claims that Americans who value their civil liberties under the Second Amendment are the ones really responsible for it.

Remember, this is the man who said ISIS was “contained.” Recall, too, that California already has all the gun control laws Obama wants to make universal.

Source: Democrats singing same old song: Gun control and climate change – Central Maine

Share

Gary Marbut, MSSA, Responds to AG’s Comments About Gun Violence

Please note Mr. Marbut’s statement about the rapid increase in gun ownership, the rapid decrease in gun violence, EXCEPT in GUN FREE ZONES, where gun violence continues to escalate.

Share

Really Stupid Ideas About People Control and Guns

guncontrolcars

tooyoungguns

Share

S.649: One of Those “Reasonable” Gun Control Laws

I tire immensely from the brain dead regurgitation I constantly hear from people who don’t understand the difference between a right, a privilege, a God-given right, while at the same time calling for “something to be done” and labeling it “reasonable.” And yes, I’m speaking about gun control, or more accurately defined as anti rights people control.

S.649, “Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of 2013”, is an example of anti rights people control, that has little to do with “reasonable” background checks prior to purchasing a firearm and nothing to do with making communities and/or schools safer.

The entire bill is long, confusing, as is intended to be full of legal mumbo-jumbo. I have yet to get through reading the entire bill, say little about deciphering it.

Yesterday, I received and email about this bill and that email pointed out some things people should know about this bill as it pertains to Sec. 122 – Firearms Transfers. Below is a cut and paste of that section only (a link to the entire bill is above), with some highlighting, followed by some comments and my interpretations as to just what it might mean.

(Begin)

SEC. 122. FIREARMS TRANSFERS.

(a) In General- Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended–

(1) by repealing subsection (s);

(2) by redesignating subsection (t) as subsection (s);

(3) in subsection (s), as redesignated–

(A) in paragraph (3)(C)(ii), by striking `(as defined in subsection (s)(8))’; and

(B) by adding at the end the following:

`(7) In this subsection, the term `chief law enforcement officer’ means the chief of police, the sheriff, or an equivalent officer or the designee of any such individual.’; and

(4) by inserting after subsection (s), as redesignated, the following:

`(t)(1) Beginning on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of the Fix Gun Checks Act of 2013, it shall be unlawful for any person who is not licensed under this chapter to transfer a firearm to any other person who is not licensed under this chapter, unless a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer has first taken possession of the firearm for the purpose of complying with subsection (s). Upon taking possession of the firearm, the licensee shall comply with all requirements of this chapter as if the licensee were transferring the firearm from the licensee’s inventory to the unlicensed transferee.

`(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to–

`(A) bona fide gifts between spouses, between parents and their children, between siblings, or between grandparents and their grandchildren;

`(B) a transfer made from a decedent’s estate, pursuant to a legal will or the operation of law;

`(C) a temporary transfer of possession that occurs between an unlicensed transferor and an unlicensed transferee, if–

`(i) the temporary transfer of possession occurs in the home or curtilage of the unlicensed transferor;

`(ii) the firearm is not removed from that home or curtilage during the temporary transfer; and

`(iii) the transfer has a duration of less than 7 days; and

`(D) a temporary transfer of possession without transfer of title made in connection with lawful hunting or sporting purposes if the transfer occurs–

`(i) at a shooting range located in or on premises owned or occupied by a duly incorporated organization organized for conservation purposes or to foster proficiency in firearms and the firearm is, at all times, kept within the premises of the shooting range;

`(ii) at a target firearm shooting competition under the auspices of or approved by a State agency or nonprofit organization and the firearm is, at all times, kept within the premises of the shooting competition; or

`(iii) while hunting or trapping, if–

`(I) the activity is legal in all places where the unlicensed transferee possesses the firearm;

`(II) the temporary transfer of possession occurs during the designated hunting season; and

`(III) the unlicensed transferee holds any required license or permit.

`(3) For purposes of this subsection, the term `transfer’–

`(A) shall include a sale, gift, loan, return from pawn or consignment, or other disposition; and

`(B) shall not include temporary possession of the firearm for purposes of examination or evaluation by a prospective transferee while in the presence of the prospective transferee.

`(4)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Attorney General may implement this subsection with regulations.

`(B) Regulations promulgated under this paragraph–

`(i) shall include a provision setting a maximum fee that may be charged by licensees for services provided in accordance with paragraph (1); and

`(ii) shall include a provision requiring a record of transaction of any transfer that occurred between an unlicensed transferor and unlicensed transferee accordance with paragraph (1).’.

(b) Technical and Conforming Amendments-

(1) SECTION 922- Section 922(y)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking `, (g)(5)(B), and (s)(3)(B)(v)(II)’ and inserting `and (g)(5)(B)’.

(2) SECTION 925A- Section 925A of title 18, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking `subsection (s) or (t) of section 922′ and inserting `section 922(s)’.

(3) NICS IMPROVEMENT AMENDMENTS ACT- Section 103(f) of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 is amended by striking `section 922(t)’ and inserting `section 922(s)’.

(4) CONSOLIDATED AND FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2012- Section 511 of title V of division B of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 (18 U.S.C. 922 note) is amended by striking `subsection 922(t)’ and inserting `section 922(s)’ each place it appears.

(End)

In the first section that I emboldened for you, I interpret this to mean that before you can “transfer” a gun, it must go to a licensed dealer. So what does it mean to “transfer?”

Here’s what I think and perhaps you can think of others:

1. To sell
2. To make a gift
3. To loan
4. Any act where a gun is moved from your possession at home to another location and/or will ultimately result in such.

The bill does list exemptions and this is where you have to pay very close attention.

There is an exemption about gifting a gun providing it is done within the family:

“(A) bona fide gifts between spouses, between parents and their children, between siblings, or between grandparents and their grandchildren”

A gun can transfer ownership provided you do it in a legal will or “the operation of law”(Just what does that mean?)

You can loan your buddy or neighbor, etc. one of your guns IF it is done according to the rules of S.649

“(i) the temporary transfer of possession occurs in the home or curtilage [adjacent property] of the unlicensed transferor;

`(ii) the firearm is not removed from that home or curtilage during the temporary transfer; and

`(iii) the transfer has a duration of less than 7 days.”

This is so “reasonable” that I can loan you my gun for up to 7 days but you can’t leave my house and “curtilage.”

But this isn’t all. At the end of (iii), the lawyers added an “and”. Here’s what the “and” says:

“(D) a temporary transfer of possession without transfer of title made in connection with lawful hunting or sporting purposes if the transfer occurs–

`(i) at a shooting range located in or on premises owned or occupied by a duly incorporated organization organized for conservation purposes or to foster proficiency in firearms and the firearm is, at all times, kept within the premises of the shooting range;

`(ii) at a target firearm shooting competition under the auspices of or approved by a State agency or nonprofit organization and the firearm is, at all times, kept within the premises of the shooting competition; or

`(iii) while hunting or trapping, if–

`(I) the activity is legal in all places where the unlicensed transferee possesses the firearm;

`(II) the temporary transfer of possession occurs during the designated hunting season; and

`(III) the unlicensed transferee holds any required license or permit.”

I can loan you a gun at a shooting range……well, only a shooting range as defined in this bill, which is a bunch of mumbo-jumbo, clap trap, bullpucky!

What’s that you say? You’d like to borrow my .308 Savage, bolt action for the upcoming deer hunting season? Sure! No problem…..well, maybe there is. I can loan (transfer) you my gun but I can’t let you have it until deer season opens next week. I guess I could bring it to the firing range so you can practice but the nearest government approved shooting range is 150 miles away. Providing you have a hunting license, you can show up at my house at legal shooting time, the first day of deer season and I’ll loan you my gun. But there is one thing I have to tell you. I can loan you the gun but you can’t leave my house or adjacent property. You’re welcome to stay the allotted 7 days and hang out. We’ll talk about the gun and what it used to be like when a man was free in this country to do such wonderful activities as hunting.

And just so you know, the Attorney General, yeah, the same one that likes to wiretap and spy on anyone that doesn’t agree with him, has the authority to set a maximum amount a licensed gun dealer can charge for carrying out your desire to transfer a gun. Oh and shucks! I almost forgot. Did I mention that with each transfer, where required to use a licensed gun dealer to make the transfer, a background check will be performed – a reasonable one of course.

So there’s your “reasonable” anti human being bill that you can stick where the sun doesn’t shine.

Go to hell!

Share

Words of Communist Despot Michael Bloomberg

This is a quote taken from comments made by Michael Bloomberg, Big Brother mayor of New York City. I got news for Mr. Bloomberg. Watching the actions of the Gestapoesque police during the manhunt for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, someone(s) in law enforcement threw the constitution on the ground and pissed on it.

“The people who are worried about privacy have a legitimate worry,” Mr. Bloomberg said during a press conference in Midtown. “But we live in a complex word where you’re going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.”

Share

Day 91 – No Executive Orders

DEVIOUS!

Day 91 and no executive orders on the White House website.

obamaboston

Unable to See Truth

Is the world going mad? Has it already gone to the dogs? Maybe we aren’t angry enough yet? Is the U.S. rotting from the inside out?

From the beginning of time, the evil nature of man has sought to control all people and all things. Some may argue that these power brokers were and are doing what they believed best for “their” people, but one could contend that merely the desire to control the masses, in and of itself, to be wrong and any so-called good intent is perceived only through a desire to reinterpret the Truth.

Control is the key word isn’t it? There have existed quotes from the ruling elites; such things as “control the food supply and you control the world” or “control the oil supply, etc.” How does that control come about? In order to control people, one has to find how to force the people, either knowingly or not, to submit to controlling features, even if in small junctures.

Perhaps foremost in people’s minds is the fallout from the events of 9/11. Fear struck people, as would be normal and along with that fear, our government took the opportunity to convince people they must give up some of their rights in order to be protected……..by the government. If only people understood they really need protection FROM their government. But, our society is now loaded up with people unable to think for themselves, nor be bothered with such things as who’s in charge and what the hell are they doing. Instead they want to be led. They like slavery, much because as time progresses fewer and fewer people have any idea what inalienable rights are.

Not much has changed since 9/11 and as we have seen since shootings in Arizona, Colorado and Connecticut, the control freaks our out in full force exploiting the fear factor in order to convince more Americans to give up even more of their rights; a move that in rational thinking runs contrary to the entire concept of inalienable rights. And isn’t that the plan?

Yesterday we had a terrorist bombing in Boston during the marathon and the smoke has yet to settle and already actions are underway to steal more of our rights. But how do you counter this nonsense when most of those with any amount of power, i.e. the media, bloggers, individuals, groups, etc., don’t understand what is going on. All too often those who may think they are doing good and countering an offensive against rights, are simply bringing in more fuel to add to the fire. Real change must begin with a better historical perspective. Let me cite an example.

A reader sent me a link to an article published on The Outdoor Wire by Jim Shepherd. The title is, “Terror Again, California Asks for Help.” (Note: You may have to scroll far down the page to find the article or do a site search to find it. The Outdoor Wire does a lousy job of creating links to stand alone pages for their articles.)

The author is saying that this is no time to be asking for laws that effectively or actually disarm the American people, when there still exist threats of terrorism, both foreign and domestic. I agree. But his reasoning on how this assault needs to be handled lacks historic perspective and as a result misdirects and misrepresents the attitudes of our people.

Here’s what the author said about Americans’ reactions over terror attacks.

Yesterday’s blasts in Boston didn’t just injure and kill innocent people, it reopened the issue of terror in the United States. As authorities raced around to reassure citizens they were doing everything possible, there was a question being asked around the country: do terrorists think the United States has forgotten about 9/11 and gotten weak-again?

I’m not going to speculate there, but the concerted efforts of some elected officials to disarm the citizenry would certainly embolden most of the “terrorist types” I’ve had the occasion to run across throughout 40 years in the news business. I recall the late Moammar Khadafi sitting around and telling reporters that he wasn’t concerned about the United States because the nation was “rotting from the inside out because of the corruption of the nation’s morals.” He was dead wrong on that a couple of decades later, but at the time, the nation was still shaking off the Iranian hostage crisis and the first serious attacks on US citizens abroad. He was sponsoring international terrorism, and he wasn’t overly concerned that the US would do anything about it.

It took 9/11 to get the United States angry. An angry American is an awe-inspiring though idea[?] in much of the rest of the world. Normally, the world really does consider us to generally be weak, too-comfortable with sustaining our lifestyle to realize we just might be rotting from the inside out.

The author dispels any notion that this country is “rotting from the inside out.” He also says that once Americans get angry they get back on track. One can choose to believe that and I suppose to some degree they do but they never got back on the right track. This is proven by our willingness to give up our rights in the name of safety.

I’m no Moammar Khadafi sympathizer but perhaps the dictator’s notion was more rooted in historic fact than that of this author. It is my opinion that what this author, and many others trying to get a grasp on some kind of sanity and understanding of what is happening around us, is attempting to describe a symptom of a bigger disease. That disease is, in fact, a loss of a moral compass to guide our people. This isn’t going to happen overnight. It’s a process and as the process muddles along, the people pay little attention. The result is they don’t see what has happened. In attempts to recall history, we are often laughed at that we don’t know our history and what they have learned is reinterpreted, edited history.

I’m not presenting new thoughts here. Nor am I trying to preach to people about their morals and chosen lifestyles. I don’t have to. All of these chapters and books have already been written. History repeatedly tells us that societies that lose their moral focus rot from the inside out.

Why is this not being seen? For the same reason it was seldom seen throughout all of history. We are all part of a slow moving social destruction and while on the ride, cannot see what is really happening and thus denial, such as the author here has displayed when he said in response to Khadafi’s comment, “He was dead wrong on that a couple of decades later.” That’s denial, the result of being immersed in the problem.

We can’t attempt to trump up anger thinking it is the catalyst to solve our problems. As a society in trouble, we refuse to see that others want to control us and in order to do that they must frighten us. A frightened mass of people, will pretty much do as they are told, because they have been taught, wrongly, to have blind trust in government. When in history has that EVER worked?

All the right and wrong things will be said as we mop up emotionally from Boston, while at the same time debating the need to disarm the people. But in the end, to only those keeping score, we will end up with fewer rights and less freedom that God intended us to have. So shall it be written, so shall it be done.

Share

Day 49 – No Executive Orders

CONNIVING!

Day 49 and while we wait for the 23 executive orders in which President Obama did a fake end around on us, we now are waiting on yet another lie by this tyrant. President Obama mostly declared that life as we know is would cease to exist if the republicans allowed sequestration to happen.

Not intending to get off the subject of guns here but much of this subject about guns and people control is based upon the work of this despotic ruler who lies and puts the fear of God in people forcing them to submit to many things they otherwise might not. Sequestration isn’t about cutting the budget. It’s about limiting the amount of tax increase. So think about things for a minute and consider a few things.

The republicans are lying just as much as Obama and the democrats. One need only open their eyes to see. None tell the truth….ever. We now find out that revenue to the United States Government this year will be the highest amount in history and the lying bastards want more of our money, refusing to cut spending. They tell us the ONLY cuts that can possibly help is to cut “entitlement” programs. Do you know what that means?

The bottom line here is nothing we see and hear is real…….NOTHING! And we must change our way of thinking. STOP listening to these propagandizing, totalitarian, Charlie McCarthys and use your own brain for a change. Why will things be so much different with sequestration when all that is happening is a reduction in the amount of increase you and I have to pay in taxes. Why are “THEY” telling us this stuff? Simple. They want to scare you and I in order that we will become even more submissive. And, they can use it as an excuse to do anything they want financially and blame it on sequestration. We’ve been down this road before. Our government is evil and corrupt. How do we fix it?

If we can open our eyes and see what is really going on, the gains in understanding can go a long way. President Obama has never had any real intention of writing executive orders to ban guns and make kids safer in school. His goal, and one that has been successful, is to scare us all. He will write the orders when the time comes to do so. In the meantime, I will continue to expose his fraud in hopes that others can see his dishonesty and the path he is intending to take us all down.

There are no executive orders that can be found on gun control on the White House website.

Do you think that WHEN President Obama writes his gun control executive orders they will not have much affect on Americans? Consider some of the FEMA executive orders this fascist dictator has written.

femaexecutiveorders

One might ask themselves why would President Obama want to disarm the American people? Unbelievable as it seems to be, if you were to consider all of the bills, along with the countless executive orders this president has written that gives him full dictatorial powers in cases of “national security”, many of Obama’s actions begin to make sense.

If you paid attention to the FEMA executive orders shown above, and this is only a few, aren’t all of these about controlling the people, taking away their rights, destruction of the freedoms to move about freely, etc.? How many times have I written that the last stronghold any dictator, foreign or domestic, has to overcome to gain control is disarming the the people…..the largest armed army on the face of the planet?

Hopefully, while you are thinking those few things over, recall I have also written about how our Department of Homeland Security has purchased 1.6 – 1.8 billion rounds of ammunition. While unaware and uncaring Americans bury their heads even deeper in the sand, and the propaganda machine controlled by the ruling elite blocks citizens from learning truth, it has been discovered that Homeland Security has purchased just over 2,700 light armored tanks. Why? Can you just ask yourself why? Does the idea that with the president’s executive orders, his desire to disarm the people and Homeland Security buying billions of rounds of ammo and light armored tanks, bother you? What comes next?

And speaking of propaganda, which seems to be a recurring theme in this blog post, a Maine resident responded with an opinion piece in the Bangor Daily News about Agenda 21. It appears Maine is trying to take extraordinary steps in a proposed bit of legislation: LD 220, “An Act to Ban United Nations Agenda 21 in Maine.” Interesting idea, but……

What Diana George Chapin, the author of the opinion piece, writes addresses propaganda:

The BDN’s Feb. 23 article, “The good, bad and pricey parts of using public money for land conservation,” started an important public dialogue about conservation in Maine, but the article only opened a small window into a topic that desperately requires in-depth discussion in communities and across the state. Why? Because Maine people have been systematically propagandized by the message “conservation is good” without having a meaningful public discussion about some of the collateral damage the land preservation movement is generating in rural towns.(Emboldening added)

Brilliant are the truthful words to describe why Maine people, or all people for that matter, think the way they do about conservation. I hope you realize, or are beginning to, that this sort of propaganda blitzing is not unique to the topic of conservation. This tactic is used for instilling hatred in people who own guns and is the number one contributing factor in the destruction of the Second Amendment.

Share