November 23, 2020

Operation COVID-19: The Complete Works of Censorship and Mind Control

We have now progressed in this fascist and totalitarian society to a point where, not only are Media platforms and organizations deliberately and boastfully “scrubbing” or censoring anything deemed contrary information to the official talking points of the fascists, but a majority of the public applaud the move, I suppose believing it is for their own good.

This kind of public ignorance reminds me (true story but no names) of the person who was scared to drive down a certain street that was heavily occupied with foot traffic from Scientologists thinking that someone being near that many of them might cause them to become a victim of their brainwashing.

Regardless, any fascist government or organization, cannot tolerate opposing thoughts and especially facts that contradict the official talking points, also know as propaganda. Because of this, all efforts must be made to squelch any and all opposition. This is necessary because the fascists’ “truth” can never be supported with real truth.

There once was a time in this country (United States) that no one dared to deliberately censor someone. The right to free speech was actually considered a valuable thing. Free speech and the consequences of free speech become a very powerful instrument when all thoughts and ideas are discussed, and then the effort of those concerned and who care, worked through all the ideas and reached their own conclusions based on presented evidence – actual learning.

This is past history and something that can never be used again due to the manipulation of minds and modern technology. Few people, anymore, look for information and facts beyond what they can glean from a 141-character text message. Pathetic when you consider the dangers and the results.

Because free speech was mostly protected and considered a valuable social construct, control over thoughts and ideas had to come from surreptitious actions, such as the Central Intelligence Agency’s effort to actively label any ideas that do not fully support the agenda at hand as a conspiracy theory.

Just because this progressive, totalitarian society of automatons now seem to endorse censorship for their own protection from a boogyman, THEY can’t simply rely on censorship to accomplish THEIR tasks. And so, attacking all contrary thoughts and ideas to, say, the official talking points on COVID-19, remains in the toolbox of instruments to dismantle any and all resistance.

It is my opinion that Operation COVID-19 is so loaded down with nonsensical regulations and guidelines, many contrary to everything we have learned throughout medical history, that what is going on is far more than addressing a government-declared “pandemic.”

Not all contrary thoughts are found on Facebook, Youtube, etc. where the fascist censors, with the support of the corrupt government, deliberately remove any information they deem unsupportive of the official propaganda of the Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organization…or at least that is the excuse that is being used.

It therefore becomes necessary to rely on the good, proven, and trusty efforts of calling out the oppositions’ information and labelling it a conspiracy theory.

Here’s an example. In the Atlantic Online, a writer not only takes the time to attack one specific Youtube video, of course, labeling it a conspiracy theory and all those that believe the content of the video as conspiracists, he actually takes the time to instruct the brainwashed masses, that is, those who are frightened of opposing information, like the person who feared brainwashing from the Scientologists simply because they exists, on how to deal with such conspiracy theories and also how to respond to anyone who tries to talk to you about those conspiracy theories.

In the article, I think we are left with a couple different ideas about what is going on. First, is the author of this piece fully cognizant of the CIA’s program of censorship through tagging information a conspiracy theory or demonizing the person who is the messenger? Or, second, is the author so ignorant, that in his accusations, he’s incapable of comprehending his own hypocrisy and it is pretty much a case of the pot calling the kettle black?

More than likely it’s mostly ignorance and the author is, as he even labeled those who choose to believe and follow as “true believers,” one of those who has become a “True Believer” in the power of censorship and propaganda and he feels safer that way.

In today’s brain dead world, it is far more effective to just call anything you don’t agree with a conspiracy theory because the overwhelming majority of people are too lazy and incapable of researching and learning for themselves. It is for that reason, logic should tell us that there is more to the promotion of discrediting a person than just pinning on the label. The effort had to exist to bring this society to a point that everything they believe comes from a tiny hand-held electronic device, which now we know as being completely censored.

With this amount of human manipulation and mind control, carrying out such things as Operation COVID-19 becomes quite easy.

Share

“FAKEBOOK” Openly Announces They Censor What THEY Don’t Like

I don’t prop up the fascists at Facebook by having an account and using their product. Idiots by the millions continue to do so and evidently they love being used, abused, lied to, and censored in what they can say and do. Honestly, how stupid can people get?

I was told this afternoon that Facebook sent out the following announcement. They don’t even try to hide their control and manipulation of what is allowed to be written and shown on their domain.

“We removed 5 Pages, 20 Facebook accounts, and 6 Groups that originated in the US and focused domestically. Our investigation linked this activity to individuals associated with the QAnon network known to spread fringe conspiracy theories. We found this activity as part of our internal investigations into suspected coordinated inauthentic behavior ahead of the 2020 election in the US.”

So, let me be forthcoming about this. You are all idiots…every one of you who continues to use Fakebook, Farcebook, whatever you want to call it. Q and Qanon are all frauds. They are no different then any other fake entity attempting to pass themselves off as the good guys. QAnon can rot in Hell. Facebook can rot in Hell, The U.S. Government can rot in Hell.

Farcebook is openly telling everyone that they will censor and control anything and everything on their Internet presence. They are controlling ONLY what THEY want you to see. This approach should send up red flags everywhere telling people this action goes against the very principles so many people claim to believe in. But it’s not. Whatever happened to free speech?

Oh, yeah. I get it. The criminal locusts who lie, cheat, and steal in Washington, D.C. make up the rules that allow the CIA (who own and manipulate Facebook) to legally censor and feed propaganda as they see fit (Go look it up in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013…but you won’t because you’re a lazy slug.)

You will choose to believe that Facebook is a private enterprise and you say, “I don’t care. I have nothing to hide. People shouldn’t be allowed to publish lies and propaganda.” Really? And what of that propaganda crap sandwich you choose to believe is THE truth and nothing but the truth? Somehow in your pea-sized, well-manipulated brain, you have decided that what anybody else says that you don’t agree with needs to be censored…banned. You can’t even think beyond the end of your nose what’s going to happen when they turn on you. Wear a mask because THEY tell you to. Keep 6-feet from somebody else, because THEY tell you to. Get a vaccine because THEY tell you to. Get a chip inserted in your right had, because THEY tell you to. We’re all gonna die because THEY tell us so and you believe everything THEY say.

Facebook has been controlled by the CIA since the very beginning. Because they are a government agency, and Facebook is theirs, they can control any and all because YOUR criminal locust Congress wrote the laws while you had your nose crammed up a “smart” phone that’s making you stupid.

But you keep right on supporting Facebook. Nothing I have ever said in the past has influenced anybody, so I don’t expect it will change now. Hell, I can’t even convince my own family to give it up.

So, in case you can’t tell. I don’t give a rat’s ass anymore. I got my stuff together and I know where I’m headed. I don’t care. I feel sorry for all of you. You are blinded and you love your blindness.

I don’t care if I offend. Whatever it might take to get but one person to open their damned eyes. What a great day that will be….but I’m not holding my breath. Nothing short of a miracle can help you now.

Now, go see what Facebook has to say about this. That’s the “truth” you’re looking for.

RANT, RANT, RANT!!!

Share

We Love The Earth?

Okay! Now I realize that I don’t live in this world, nor do I ever intend to, and that might be because this video is representative of Satan’s earth of which I want no part of.

Living in another existence in this fleshly body of which I hope soon I can shed, someone brought to my attention the below video that appears to be quite the rage…unfortunately. According to what YouTube places on its page (yeah, if you haven’t figured it out yet, they can lie, cheat, and steal just like all the others) there have been over 90-million views of this video.

Before watching it, if you choose to remain a part of the Whore of Babylon, I should warn you, that to this representative of the image of Yahweh and His Spirit of Truth, the contents of this video are exceptionally crude, distasteful (and I’m being kind here), vulgar, and what’s worse, is loaded with propaganda that is geared toward destroying the minds of children and most adults in this post normal existence who lack the brain power and wisdom to know any better.

I post this video only in hopes of opening the eyes of any of the blinded to understand how Satanic propaganda works, and the Strong Delusion that is being heaped upon this earth.

I hope that if you share this video with others that you know, that you will also include the words which I have included. At least give someone else a chance to escape this insanity.

Most will think I’m the delusional one, but that’s okay! I know the difference. If you don’t see what I see, I feel bad for you that you are missing out on an existence that is far more rewarding and has a much better ending than the end to which you are traveling.

Share

Return to an Apologetic Savage Nation

Recently, Jim Beers, contributing writer for this website, wrote an article that concerned a piece found in the Wall Street Journal. The premise of the work is that with the ongoing promotion of “neo” ecological theory of hands-off “natural regulation,” wildlife and land management, and “rewilding,” the society is regressing from a civilized people back to a savage existence.

It prompted me to write my own article that first appeared in print in the Bethel Citizen (small Maine town) newspaper. Here is that article:

Return to a “Savage” State

Open Air with Tom Remington

James Beers, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service employee who spent considerable time in Washington, D.C., who became a whistleblower discovering as much as $60 million was stolen from Pittman-Robertson Federal Excise taxes to be used for reintroducing wolves to the Northern Rockies and other illegal activities, recently said that if we are not willing to put a stop to the current “Ecological Theory” that places man as equal to or lesser than that of plants and animals and “spiritual rewilding” our forests and plains, this lack of action will “…return all of us eventually into a “savage state.”

The definition of “civilize” is “to bring out of a savage state.” As our civilization advanced from what some have perceived as uncontrolled slaughter of many of our wild animals and destruction of the habitat that confronted the settlers, through responsible wildlife management which led to developing an understanding of the cooperation of both consumption and conservation, establishing the North American Model of Wildlife Management, we are now moving in a direction that is calling for a hands-off approach to plant and animal management; establishing wilderness and predator protection based somewhat on the belief that Nature produces a preferred outcome.

If the land was in a “natural” state when we found it, i.e. “savage state,” working to restore it to what it once was, or what we think it once was, surely must be a return to an uncivilized, savage state.

We have and are being misled that leaving things up to Nature, will provide for a stabilization of animal and plant existence, i.e. that Nature achieves a “balance” where everything is Nirvana. My very good friend, Dr. Valerius Giest, a professor emeritus at the University of Calgary, says that the Utopian belief in nature, free from the hands of man, achieving balance is “intellectual rubbish.” Life consists of constant negative and positive feedback loops where everything is in constant change.

Leaving it to Nature will yield what Nature has to offer. Reality shows us that Nature’s results are not what most of us prefer. We prefer control and manipulation to achieve healthy plants and wildlife as best possible, while at the same time continuing to provide an opportunity for that long-held, civilized existence of regulated hunting, trapping, and fishing.

If we prefer a healthy existence for our wildlife, someone has to manage and control it. Nature will not, contrary to what some believe, give us what we want in this civilized society. Taking from the resource in a responsible, scientific approach is a cooperation that undertakes the task of managing wildlife for a healthy bounty and providing opportunities for those who wish to take sustenance from that resource. It’s a win-win.

It seems with each passing year, the grumbles and groans get louder and louder of the need to end hunting, fishing, and trapping. As it currently stands, we exist in a back scratching situation where licensed hunters, fishers, and trappers pay the costs of wildlife management in return for an opportunity to reap the rewards of taking from the resource. To deny that privilege, thinking wildlife will manage itself is wrong thinking. To steal it away with a belief that wildlife will control itself is uncivilized, returning us eventually to the previous savage state.

The next time you see a hunter, trapper, or fisherman, thank them for providing the means of responsible conservation so that all of us can enjoy a healthy wildlife.

********

Today, a friend sent me a link to an article published at National Review called “Friends of Elmer.” In this piece of work, the author points out how the existence of the (perhaps second) oldest profession, hunting, has morphed into an act of apologizing and calling on all hunters, as was requested by the long-held magazine of hunting and outdoor activities, Sports Afield, “…for the sake of the hunting community, please don’t say anything about it on social media, and please, please don’t post any pictures.” This in regards to whether anyone was able to obtain a license to hunt a grizzly bear.

Another hunting magazine was quoted as saying, “We need to be very, very careful and intentional about what we post and what are in those posts.”

The author of the referred-to article writes: “The problem with that line of argument is that dead animals are necessarily front-and-center when it comes to hunting. That is, ultimately, what hunting is about — and hunters should not apologize for that. Hunting is one of the most ancient of organized human undertakings: Hunting, and not that other thing, may very well be the world’s oldest profession. And whether one thinks of it as sport or ritual — or simply as gathering protein — it is part of an honorable tradition, and a pursuit that can be, at its best, profound.”

Aren’t these actions of apologizing for being a hunter and for hunting, and the fear we are instilled with driving us to feel the need to apologize, just another aspect of this society’s regression toward a savage state? If, as has been stated, our society brought itself out of an uncivilized existent, to return to that is savage.

I witness repeatedly, fish and wildlife departments across the country living in fear of lawsuits from environmentalists and animal rights groups. I understand the concern but not the fear (or apologies) but are we to shed our responsibilities to manage, control, protect where needed, etc. wildlife because we fear a lawsuit?

The author says that the protests from people are “aesthetic” – a set of idealistic false principles guiding one’s every move, an almost “Keeping up with the Joneses” kind of existence. It also sounds a lot like the changing of our “Foundational Libraries” – the Power Structure‘s efforts to rewrite the foundational principles and morals that are the driving force of our cultural existence.

Partly because of fear of lawsuits, but mostly due to Environmentalism’s powerful outreach to brainwash (change the foundational library) the masses, this very disease has reached epidemic proportions in this country, as can be witnessed at any time in our society; apologizing for being a hunter. I guess it holds more moralistic and cultural value to proclaim your sexual orientation and expose your immoral behavior, along with your hatred and complete disregard for your Creator, than to admit you are a hunter.

If you are ashamed to be a hunter, feel the need to apologize, and believe that the North American Model of Wildlife Management is wrong, before you apologize for being a hunter, destroy your guns and never buy a hunting license again. Don’t be an apologist as some of our traditional hunting magazines, as well as many hunters, are doing. They are only doing the bidding for those changing our foundational structures while at the same time putting a noose around the necks of themselves and the long-held heritage of hunting.

Share

Lies, Misinformation, and Emotional Clap Trap About Bear Management, Hunting, and Trapping

Katie Hansberry, head of the Maine chapter of the Humane Society of the United States, and one who has weaseled her way onto the subcommittee for black bears at the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife has penned an opinion piece and the Bangor Daily News has published it as a “Special to the Bangor Daily News.”

I refuse to provide a link to her propaganda as it is not worthy of any recognition beyond expressing my complete disgust that any print publication would allow such unsubstantiated drivel to be published in their paper.

Not one shred of evidence was provided by the author to back up her ridiculous claims about bears, bear behavior, hunting, or trapping. The claims are so bizarre that the newspaper should have questioned the content and sought some kind of substantiations to support the claims.

There are none.

One can only hope that enough readers will see the work for what it is and toss it in the garbage where it belongs. All are entitled to an opinion. Such opinions presented in this fashion are nothing more than agitprop drowning in emotional animal perversion proselytizing.

Shame on the Bangor Daily News for giving this inculcation space in their paper.

 

Share

Unity College Commencement Address: We’re All Gonna Die! The Rest of the World Is Wrong

It is one thing that is terribly wrong when wildlife biology scientism is being propagandized at a college that specializes in Environmentalism propaganda. It’s yet another to address the graduating class with garbage about being on the “right side” of environmentalism and that we are all going to die because of Trump, Ryan Zinke, global warming, killing animals…and the list goes on and on.

Many wildlife biologists graduate from Unity College in Maine. Some stay in Maine to work and others go beyond. Either way, being brainwashed with Environmentalism before being sent out into the world as environmental change agents is what’s wrong with everything. They are all being mentally manipulated and controlled like environmental Jesuits.

Commencement speaker Jeff Corwin said things like: “Here’s the bad news: We have incredible challenges with our planet,” and “There is opportunity for your new speciality as an environmentalist capable of taking on the challenges of a 21st-century planet in serious peril,” also “Feeling this great honorary ribbon going around me, I thought, ‘Oh, that’s probably what it will feel like when the secretary of the interior puts a noose around my neck because he doesn’t like what I’m saying,” and finally, “I believe we are at a time that a lot of people are going to be on the wrong side of history — the wrong side of natural history. You want to be on the right side, and courage will make that happen in very difficult, polarizing times.”

This is part proof that Environmentalism has become like a militaristic entity of vigilantism. They craft their own form of scientism, brainwash the willing masses with it and send them into the world believing they own the high ground on everything environmental, urging them to get in the faces and boldly challenge anyone who opposes their religion.

There is little hope for the future of wildlife management.

And by the way, I haven’t said this in a while:

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share

Dick’s Sporting Goods: I Laughed Til I Pissed My Pants

I figure better that than getting mad for a bold-face lie being spread by Dick’s Sporting Goods who say they are “destroying” all the “assault-style” guns they pulled from their shelves, along with related accessories.

I have one word for Dick’s and anyone who will buy into their fascist propaganda:

BULLSHIT!!!!!

Share

Selective Blindness, Changing Perceptions and the Growing Cultural Divide

Today I laughed. I actually laughed or at least grinned several times. Why? Mostly because I do not willingly exist in what most would consider this “normal” world – normal being whatever each individual and group of individuals has determined to be correct and thus normal. Because of my sometimes “out-of-planet” experiences, witnessing the normal, but to me, abnormal, events of the day must cause laughter. Without it, I’m not sure the results.

Most entertaining is when intellectuals(?) wander down roads of philosophical bliss, pointing out the obvious, created by the obvious, for the obvious, but pause in confusion, not understanding such creations, or better yet, intimating that the answer must lie in some unexplored human psyche beyond mortal comprehension. Yikes!

At the root of this laughter, sometimes contrasted with anger and disgust, was a long, sometimes rambling essay of what, in part, was the transformation of human attitudes and perspectives about life in general and living with predators more specifically. The author writes:

We have become tame in Europe, and that is a good thing. Europeans are on the whole no longer wild or savage, as we certainly were a thousand, five hundred, or for that matter sixty-seven years ago. The potential for savagery and bloodthirstiness remains within us, as shown with such dreadful clarity during the war in the former Yugoslavia in 1991?1999. But we are for the most part tame and prefer that state-sanctioned bloodletting on a large scale happen outside the borders of the European Union. And that is, all things considered, a good thing. No one in their right mind would want to go back to the fear and insecurity of anticipated attacks by Vikings, bigoted religious fanatics, or the soldiers of the Axis Powers. The same can be said about our relationship to animals. Most aspects of the living conditions of pets and farm animals are regulated by law in the EU. For wild animals, there are special habitat directives.

My initial reaction to reading this was to ask, what world does this person live in? But then, I realized it wasn’t what world he lived in but my own existence shuns the false world he displays. While what he writes certainly may reflect his perceptions of things, I believe it only substantiates the success of the work of those who control this world and all that is in it. There must be considered the absurdity or insanity that, “state-sanctioned bloodletting” is acceptable beyond the bounds of the newly perceived “tameness.” Talk about living a life of blinded ignorance. To accept the premise of, “No one in their right mind would want to go back to the fear and insecurity of anticipated attacks by Vikings, bigoted religious fanatics, or the soldiers of the Axis Powers,” is to accept a lie and live it. More people would live in fear if they realized that all of this still exists today but is well-hidden. Media control and manipulation, outright lies and deceit, propaganda and control prohibits us from seeing the terrible things that are going on all around us.

The author admits, and accurately so, that this same attitude of blissful blindness and the denial of existing savagery, carries over into how people want to distinguish themselves and their coexistence with animals, both wild and domestic.

To this the writer states:

But something has been lost in the advance of civilization. In pace with the introduction of the refrigerator, hot running water, bathrooms with subfloor heating, and cable TV, our relationship to things wild has changed, especially our attitudes towards the predators among us. The bear, the wolf, the wolverine, the lynx: all have been transformed in our minds into symbolic, anthropomorphized abstractions. It is human nature to do so, and in a way, one could argue that this has been the case for much longer than since the end of World War II. Nevertheless, the already simplified traits have become more starkly black and white in modern, highly urbanized societies.

From the perspective of one suffering from “out-of-planet” syndrome, a serious argument could and should be made about whether or not civilization has advanced or regressed. There is no arguing the claim that “attitudes toward predators,” has changed, certainly, that man has established most animals as “symbolic, anthropomorphized abstractions” to a point where animals are given equal or superior rights to man and are always discussed with terms using human identification.

We know that out of World Wars I and II, the rapid growth of understanding the human mind and how to control and manipulate it, was exploited, for all the wrong reasons. How did it become possible that our minds see things in a completely different way than how our parents taught us and their parents taught them?

But is this really human nature to see animals from this perverse perspective? I don’t think so. It is learned or probably, in this case, planned programming of our minds in order that changes forced onto people for sinister reasons by perverts with more to gain and without one care for the welfare of any animal…or even you for that matter.

The author touches on one of the reasons for the changes in attitude when he writes:

Out in the country, that argument does not hold full sway, at least not in the areas where the predators are actually found. Country people’s empirical knowledge runs deeper and is often — though not always — more complex and objective than city people’s. The problem with European attitudes towards “our” predators, however, is that most Europeans live in cities and not in the countryside.

And the plan, as it appears to me, is to work toward changing the dynamics of human population densities so that urban dwellers surpass in numbers those of the rural world. For certainly their exists differing attitudes and perspectives between the two cultures. It would make perfect sense that if someone or group of someones was interested in control they would work using whatever means possible to grow the numbers of whichever side was ideologically prepared to sacrifice themselves for the cause. This may sound a bit extreme, but is it in reality? When you consider the words, the attitudes, the hate and the anger being perpetuated throughout, often targeted or presented as urban against suburban, somebody must have an important task to undertake.

We are but duped pawns!

Share

Animal Idolatry and the Lies to Promote It

Animal idolatry comes in various forms. One of the not-so-obvious forms is media propaganda laced with misinformation intended to mislead, most always for the purpose of conning money support out of those unable to think for themselves and to understand the truth of what they are supporting.

In this latest platform of predator drool, people are told about “killing contests” that “killing unlimited numbers of predators is legitimate wildlife management.” In support of their nonsense about “killing unlimited numbers of predators,” we read this: “How many people even know that thousands of coyotes, mountain lions, foxes, bobcats, prairie dogs, crows, and wolves are killed every year in “contests” across the country where winners get guns, belt buckles and ribbons for killing the most animals?”

These drooling fools present “killing contests” as part of “wildlife management.” Obviously they know nothing of wildlife management and/or are intentionally attempting to mislead the public by making such ridiculous claims.

Legitimate wildlife management (which, by the way, exists only in acceptable forms of environmentalism) is aware of so-called “killing contests” and the results of which are factored into their management plans and goals. The reality is that these “fake news” “killing contests” have virtually zero affect on wildlife management agencies long term management plans.

Much like a hunting season, managers allow for several things before making decisions in the next hunting harvest to know how many tags, etc. to issue to meet the goals of the 10-15 year management plans….”killing contests” included.

Now to the meat of the drool given to the public about the “unlimited” numbers of predators killed each season by “killing contests.”

Yes, there are isolated contests in various parts of the country. However, coyote populations are running amok and any legitimate game management agency would welcome reductions in coyote numbers to ensure the “public trust doctrine” the author of the drool presented calls it, can be upheld to provide balanced and healthy populations of wildlife across the board. A landscape dominated by predators, results in predator pits where wildlife in general is nonexistent.

I know of nowhere in North America where mountain lions are targets of “killing contests.” If they do exist I’m sure the reasons are serious and extenuating in order to uphold that cherished, cherry-picked “public trust doctrine.”

I know of nowhere in North America where foxes are targeted by “killing contests.” Foxes, as a rule are a tightly regulated fur bearing animal and seldom, if ever, exist in numbers that make a “killing contest” necessary or even a viable effort.

Bobcats, where they exist in this country, are a prized possession. About the only “enemy” the bobcat faces, other than competition among other predators, is the specialized bobcat hunter/trapper. Again, I know of no locations in North American where hunting contests are carried out that target bobcat.

Prairie dogs are targeted at times by those wanting to hone their shooting skills by shooting these animals at long range. Prairie dogs are notorious for carrying several diseases, many of which are harmful to other creatures, and people, and wildlife managers generally condone any means of reducing the nuisance and diseased animals.

I am not aware of “killing contests” for crows. Many states have an open season on crows and yes, some people eat crow and use the animal parts for other uses. Truth be known, the federal government deliberately kills more crows than any other person, persons or group of persons, even if there where “killing contests” for them. The Federal Government kills crows because they are a nuisance and a public safety hazard. As part of that wonderful “public trust doctrine”  it is a necessary thing in order to protect and promote other species being destroyed or limited due to excessive crow populations.

“Killing contests” for wolves made me laugh. In more states than not, believe it or not, wolves are a federally protected species. I know of one time, in Idaho, when a group, legally obtained all the necessary permits and permissions to establish a wolf and coyote killing contest. After a weekend of wolf “killing,” exactly zero wolves were killed, and a handful of coyotes.

Other than some isolated regional pockets, predator “killing contests” have no affect on the populations of these predators. It is a shame, and borders on criminal activity, that any group would attempt to sway public opinion by publishing deliberate lies in the media.

Shame on them.

I would suggest that before anyone gives money, or supports any organization like this, they first learn the truth about the propaganda being spewed.

But don’t go look!

 

Share

Those Damned Republicans And Their Demands for Control Over Immigration

Not an original idea…evidently.

Share