October 23, 2020

Like Gun Control Laws, Fascist Political Leaders Ignore Their Own COVID Laws

We see it all the time. Federal politicians who ignore the very laws they make, showing us (those with a brain) that THEIR laws are made for the attendees of the Bread and Circus events while THEY simply ignore them. There’s more than one meaning to this. The obvious is that lawmakers in Washington understand that THEY are the posterity, i.e. those the Constitution was crafted for and not the false belief in we the people. In other words, THEY are We the People, and the rest of us are we the people…serfs, servants, slaves, low-lifes, scum, expendable cow dung, forced to remain locked up in our homes, wear face masks, not work, lose our businesses, face food shortages, hoarding, social distancing and very limited access to life in general.

Some of you get angry and are outraged when, to you, it appears the lawmakers present themselves “above” the rule of law. Wake up. THEY are above the law. It was designed that way. And yet, you continue to convince yourselves it is something else. This is insanity.

The second issue that should be realized when we see lawmaker ignoring their own laws, is the fact that, as an example, Operation COVID-19, not only was designed and carried out against we the people, not We the People, but the very same criminal bastard locusts that are making the laws to oppress the people, know that COVID-19 is not real and/or is no real threat. As such, why are so many of our “leaders” not heeding the laws and guidelines they devised to bring the rest of us to our knees?

Here are three examples that should open your eyes….but won’t. First, we saw a news report (lies, all lies in case you forget) that Vice President Pence visited a Mayo Clinic and didn’t wear a mask.

Second, President Trump visited a factory where they make the masks his fascist administration forces, along with state governments, all of us to wear, and yet, he doesn’t bother to put on a face mask.

And third, this is a second hand story that came directly from a person that was on a plane in which Maine Senator Susan Collins was on. I was told that the airline (no names) required all passengers to wear face masks. In other words, you were not allowed to board the plane without a face mask on.

There were approximately 5 or 6 passengers, total, not counting any pilots or flight crew, on the plane. All passengers were wearing face masks until Senator Collins boarded the plane…without a face mask. As I understand it, she wasn’t even made, like all the other passengers, to wear a face mask to board the plane.

Before the plane left the airport, I was told all passengers removed their face masks for the duration of the flight.

Wake up! You are being duped! The politicians are crooks, liars, deceivers, criminals, locusts, serpents, pond scum. They know what’s going on. You are being taken to the cleaners.

And, evidently you like it.

Share

COVID-19: Taking Family Members Out of Home in a “Safe and Dignified Manner”

I am extremely fond of authorities entering my home, especially uninvited, and removing members of my family (to save us from COVID-19), but I am most attached to those methods that are “safe and dignified.” Kind of like getting hung with a new rope?

Share

Google’s Fascist Plans Using COVID-19 As Prop

I was having a discussion earlier today about when I thought the U.S. Fascist Corporation, and their complicit puppet regimes worldwide, would begin doing things that make little sense and then blaming it on COVID-19. It’s already begun.

I asked a short time ago if authorities, that is those of the serpent race out to kill sheep, would use deaths from COVID-19 as an excuse to explain the millions of people who will be whisked out of this world to forever be with the LORD GOD. That’s but the tip of the spear.

Today, CNBC is reporting that Google has announced, “YouTube warns it may take down more videos than it should because many staffers will be out.” Google also warns that , “there may be an increase in videos that are removed for violating Google’s policies.”  And you can bet your last roll of toilet paper that those increased video removals will be only those Google (Image of the Beast) deems run contrary to the narrative of the Beast System.

Odd isn’t it. A logical mind would reason that just the exact opposite would be the case. Google is suggesting that because there won’t be so many people working on “policy” issues, more videos will be censored and removed. How convenient is that? Google claims that decisions to remove videos that “violate” their policies will be handled via automation. So, in other words Google has designed their “automation” (wink-wink) robots to delete more videos than biased humans would do. NICE! What next?

This is just the beginning. When will such things as gas shortages begin showing up? Government has successfully taken care of food shortages, along with toilet paper and over-the-counter medicine. To complete the dictatorial take over all that is left is to stop gas from reaching gas pumps and shut down cellphone service. All HELL will break loose then.

Get ready. It WILL only get worse.

Share

Trump Will Declare National Emergency at 3 P.M. Today

Earlier today I asked what will come after an officially announced “Pandemic.” We now have our answer. At 3 P.M. today (Friday the 13th – Strong’s 13=Destruction) President Trump is expected to declare a National Emergency over COVID-19. It is being downplayed by most, as can be seen at the Yahoo Financial website where they write: “Declaring a national emergency would allow the government to marshal additional resources to combat the virus…” (emboldening added).

Most are clueless as to what this means, choosing to believe that this means the (real or fake) Coronavirus will be contained and any threats (real of fake) will be mitigated, ending life as a complete slave to a criminal, dictatorial government.

Declaring a National Emergency gives complete control of all things to the president. If you want to know what that means, try reading the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013, with all its amendments and reauthorizations. When I say the president now controls everything, I mean everything. How far will he go? How far is it that is going to be tested on a fake virus that is designed to frighten the masses into submission?

Understand, the United States Government, and all other world governments do not care one ounce about the welfare of you and I. Their only concern is what they have only been concerned about since the beginning of their existence – themselves and their posterity.

It is obvious to any who have (Spirit of the Almighty EL’s) eyes and ears, that this COVID-19 (Satan/Sheep/Slaughter) is nothing more than a common flu-like virus and yet governments have chosen to hype it to the point of scaring the masses into submission. We need to ask ourselves why. I believe we will soon find out.

Now with the president about to announce the authority given to him, as was passed by Congress during the Obama administration, hold on to your perceived liberties. You are about to be dealt a serious blow…that is to those who have continued to believe that we the (little, insignificant) people have rights.

“And the rest of the men which were not killed by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils, and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk: Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts.”
Revelation 9:20-21, KJV

The end is near…..

Share

Progressing Towards Mandatory “Mark of the Beast”

Yesterday in Maine, voters rejected any attempts to back off on mandatory vaccinations. A referendum vote refused to allow nonmedical exemptions deciding instead to uphold the totalitarian law Maine recently passed that would take the step of mandated vaccinations one step closer to complete government rule.

In a news article from an Online Maine newspaper, the article stated, “Those who support the law said it was deceitful to suggest the pharmaceutical industry had a vested interest in Maine’s law because vaccinations account for such a small fraction of pharmaceutical revenues, even though they account for billions of dollars in sales.”

This may be as it appears today for many people because they have already been caught in the trap. Besides eugenics, money is always the driving factor behind the push of chemicals/drugs on the masses. Why to some it now appears that this is not the case is because BigPharma, i.e. the rigged Beast System, has been highly successful in brainwashing the masses causing them to believe they cannot live without BigPharma’s evil potions. As part of the Beast System, the same system that has intentionally infected the world with a virus, fear of death causes irrational thoughts leading to irrational decision making.

What we are now seeing is a distinct example of the power behind the Hegelian Dialectic, i.e. thesis, reaction, antithesis. With another man-made virus deliberately introduced into the populations of billions world wide, each successive release made bigger and scarier than the last, the automatonic public obediently lines up for their vaccines while demanding the government force all others to take any vaccines they deem necessary.

And we wondered how millions of people would, without protest, line up to receive the mark of the Beast.

What also exemplifies the ignorance, hypocrisy, and irrational, emotional reactions of people is that most of the same people who are insisting that vaccines be a government-mandated event, will fight to the death for the freedom to murder unborn babies.

How does any of this make sense?

In the reactionary phase of the Hegelian Dialectic, we see the desired and preplanned result of what fear can do the masses of the shameless. We should prepare for the preplanned “solution” to the thesis.

Share

If There is Money in Incorporating Nature

I was reading an article today about the “movement” to embrace and promote “nature rights.” For those who might not get it, nature rights is the granting of the same “rights” that are granted and taken away from people. Sounds crazy and is crazy but we are existing in a post-normal, insane world led by insane people who are partly responsible for making everyone else insane. NUTS!

Most aren’t even aware that years ago corporations were given the same rights packages as humans. I believe it began with the railroads. The idea was nothing more than being able to take advantage of certain rights and privileges for profit and power – nothing more, nothing less.

And so now in our perversity, we seek the same bestowing of rights upon “Nature” – which is short on definitions and long on the potential for power and profits abuse.

That is why it isn’t a matter of if but of when the spiraling out of control cesspool of a country will eagerly make the move to grant nature and all that is in it the same “rights” as the rest of us.

Nature will be shortchanged in this affair as we as American slaves have little rights afforded us anymore and the insane in charge seem eager to give what’s left away.

Maybe Nature would be better off if the insane would just walk away and let well enough alone….NEVER HAPPEN.

Share

Putting Firearm Safety Instruction Back in the Schools

David Trahan, executive director for the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine, pens his thoughts on why Maine schools should put firearm safety instruction back in schools as a regular part of its curriculum.

Trahan writes: “When I was young, living in Clinton, firearm safety was taught in our town hall.  When hunting season came in the fall, I would carry my shotgun to class, where I would turn it over to my teacher, who would return it at the end of the day.”

Evidently I am a bit older than Mr. Trahan. When I was in school (high school) gym class included a few days dedicated to firearm safety. Class included bringing your gun to school and the teacher taught EVERYONE about proper use and safe handling. I remember practicing with a fellow classmate the proper way to climb over a fence with a rifle whether alone or with someone.

We did not, however, hand our guns over to the teacher until the end of the day. We either put them back in our cars or stored them in the gym locker until after school. We didn’t even consider it necessary to lock up the car or the locker. In those days there was enough respect that you wouldn’t steal and somewhere existed the thought that stealing a gun would likely put your own life in danger when caught.

Things have definitely changed and along with those changes is a loss in the ability to think and reason. Everyone had a gun. Everyone used a gun. Nobody feared for their life because their neighbor owned a gun. Guns were an integral part of life. And on top of all that nobody went around killing other people because they were screwed up in the head.

Essentially the gun has not changed in all these years. What has changed is the culture in which we live. It is immoral, perverse, and abusive to say the least. Our culture breeds violence. Violence is in our music, movies, video games, and books. It saturates all electronic devices. Violent games are rabidly promoted and targeted toward the youth of this country. And yet, in our brainless existence we think we can cure the problem of gun violence by banning the gun. Along with this call for banning, we see and hear other calls for “sensible” restrictions, background checks, banning styles of weapons (like if we ban “assault-style” weapons, like the kind our children learn to use in video games where killing is a measure of success, problems will go away), and an array of other absentminded solutions and never once uttering a claim that something is wrong with the culture that causes the violent acts in the first place.

Not that firearm safety education would be a wrong thing to do, but if we are truly seeking a stop to preventable violence, gun safety instruction, like most “sensible” laws, only target the lawful citizens.

By all means bring gun safety instruction back into all schools. But don’t be fooled into thinking it is a cure for the real issue nobody wants to discuss honestly.

Share

Infringe Did and Still Does Mean “INFRINGE”

Everyday is the season to infringe upon the Second Amendment. It never ceases and newly-elected politicians love to jump on the totalitarian gunboats, armed for bear, gunning (no real pun intended) for any chance they might get to further infringe (destroy) the Second Amendment. The current political season is no different than others.

The far Left’s staging of events to instill fear, hatred, and anger in the masses have set the stage they hope will carry them over the threshold (that threshold being private gun ownership) that will win them a victory that will end in defeat for all…just you wait and see. But will we even be able to recognize such defeat?

Back in January of 2016 I wrote an article about how Americans consider the Second Amendment to be essentially the only right, inalienable or constitutional depending on how you choose to view it, that is worthy of complete and unrestricted infringement. They don’t necessarily see all the other “rights” in the same way. Surely destruction of those rights is just as potentially dangerous as keeping and bearing arms – if only honesty could admit that.

Of course the original words of the Second Amendment state that the “right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

It has always been argued, never with much conviction or honesty, that when the Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment they didn’t mean that citizens, i.e. the people (small “p”), had a right to arm themselves and/or to keep arms in their possession.

An honest assessment of the intent of the the Second Amendment has been made clear through endless examination of historic documents. To support the historic significance of the right of the people (small “p”) to keep and bear arms, the U.S. Supreme Court, in it’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, in 2008, declared that the Second Amendment did guarantee the right to keep and bear arms to the people (small “p”).

Of course the downside to the Heller decision is that the majority opinion, given by the late (probably murdered) Justice Antonin Scalia, said nothing about “reasonable restrictions” or infringements to the Second Amendment. And so, even though the Supreme Court ruled that the people have a right to keep and bear arms, there has never been any ruling to determine if any “infringements” can be levied on this right, even though the Second Amendment clearly is written that the right shall NEVER be infringed. What is it here that we are not getting? Therefore, the infringement battle train continues to roll and, no doubt, will never end.

In part of the honest examination of the historic facts that drove the Second Amendment creation, I am going to look at and share with readers the etymology (origins) of two words found in the Second Amendment – “arms” and “infringed.”

Let’s start with “arms.” According to Etymonline.com, since around 1300 a.d. the root word for “arms” meant weapon. This root definition has never really changed. In examining the etymology of many words, over the span of history, the meanings of words change, and sometimes drastically. In this case arms still mean weapons…period.

Argument might be made in this research that the use of the word “arms” may have referred to “military” weapons. I realize that in some cases those who have chosen to use the history of words in their defense of the claim that the Second Amendment applied to “militias” and not the general public, too much history exists that proves the intent of the Founders was to give the people (small “p”) the right to keep and bear arms.

If one is willing to accept that historic research as a true fact, then further argument could be made that the Second Amendment should not restrict that right by prohibiting “military” weapons from those which can be kept and bared.

Regardless, there is no mistaking that when the Founding Fathers used the word “arms” it clearly meant weapons, arms, military tools. They understood the importance of a means to deter a tyrannical government. I wonder if they envisioned a tyrannical people (small “p”)?

The second word to examine is “infringed.” Like the word “arms”, since its creation, infringe has always meant what we today consider the meaning of infringe to be.

Once again, if we look at Etymonline.com, we see that since the 15th century, use of the root word meaning infringe, i.e. “enfrangen,” to violate, or from Latin, “infringere,” damage, break, has never changed in any real meaningful way

When the Founding Fathers selected the two words, “arms” and “infringe,” wasn’t it exactly clear that they were talking about “weapons” and the popular definition of infringe to mean that this right shall NEVER BE violated, damaged, or broken?

Why then do we brainwashed Americans insist on infringing upon this right? Even those claiming to hold dear the Constitution, often claiming how all others tread on it and ignore it, and yet these same mindless folks work tirelessly day in and day out to destroy the Second Amendment, some thinking they are saving it by infringing upon it?

Regardless of what can be presented as evidence, I hold out no hope that the people (small “p”) will ever understand that they are working toward their own destruction.

Oh, what have we done, and what are we doing?

Share

Political Militancy No Way To Govern

David Trahan, executive director for the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine pens an article in the September 2018 edition of the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine News, called, “Political Militancy No Way to Govern.” I applaud his words and his effort. However…

The article mostly focuses on the efforts of three Maine legislators who have chosen to target the Kittery Trading Post to force them to stop selling “assault-style” weapons and to raise the age to 21 to be able to purchase what is called a “long gun.”

Of these three legislators and others nationally, Trahan writes: “For many reasons these Legislators, and others at the national level, like Maxine Waters, have stepped over a serious ethical line. As a past State Senator and Representative, I understand elected Legislators have exceptional power to change laws that could negatively impact a business or organization they don’t agree with – like Kittery Trading Post.

“When three Maine lawmakers and their followers decided to target one company, instead of introducing a policy change through legislation (a Legislator’s job) that would have rightly affected all similar Maine companies, they become “political militants”, not policy makers.”

Let’s turn the clock back just a wee bit shall we?

Last year Maine passed LD 557, a law that inequitably targets hunters and fishermen if they are caught destroying property. No other group or individuals are included in this doling out of unjustifiable increased punishment. I believe the correct terminology that represents such unlawful targeting of one group or individual over another is “unconstitutional animus.”

The Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine was a major promoter of this law which makes little sense when you consider the words of David Trahan against the three Maine legislators who he feels have “crossed a serious ethical line” by targeting Kittery Trading Post.

Perhaps Trahan, the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine, and the Maine Legislature went further in the destruction of due process than the three Maine legislators targeting Kittery Trading Post. What the three legislators did may have crossed a perceived ethical boundary, what Maine and the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine did was, in my opinion, a direct violation of individual rights and that of due process.

Simply taking the action of “policy change” have never guaranteed that passed laws are not in violation of a person’s rights. Such is the case involving LD 557.

My call is to the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine to seek to repeal LD 557, especially in view of the facts of the statement made in the article written by the executive director of the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine.

Passage of and the promotion of LD 557 was nothing more than just another form of political militancy, which we have read is “no way to govern.” SAM should practice what they preach.

 

Share

Gun Protest: Who Said Totalitarians Had to Be Intelligent?

Protesters targeted the Kittery Trading Post in Kittery, Maine over the weekend seeking to get the store to stop selling “assault rifles” (whatever those are) and to limit the age of those wishing to purchase a rifle. As gutless totalitarians, many of the protesters don’t know which end of a rifle a bullet goes in and comes out but that didn’t stop them from displaying not only their ignorance of guns but of the Second Amendment – another example of people eager and willing to destroy all their remaining government-appropriated rights.

According to Maine Public, one protester said the Second Amendment was intended to protect muskets – uh huh! And another said, “I think if everyone wants to be entitled to a musket — fine.”

That’s about as brilliant as Susan Collins stating that Roe v. Wade was settled law but by her actions tells us the Second Amendment is not. BRILLIANT!!

If we were to use the same misguided totalitarian logic then: Everyone is “entitled” to say whatever they want so long as it is only those restricted words I want them to speak; How about everyone is limited to owning just a Toyota Prius – after all, you don’t NEED a bigger, better, car with more features, etc.; And we are protected from illegal searches and seizures unless the government decides otherwise or a group of protesters demand something else. This nonsense can go on forever but it is impossible to reason with misguided nuts who refuse to understand the truth about guns – or the truth about rights for that matter.

Recently we learned from a new study that in countries where guns are common, the rate of violent crime goes down and that guns are NOT the cause of violence – a lost society is. So then, why are we not protesting in support of a change in our society? Why are we not protesting to stop the violent music and video games? Why do we promote decadence in our society, dragging members of this culture into a cesspool of immoral behavior, lying, cheating, stealing, anger, hatred, etc.?

The answer is easy. These protesters have been brainwashed, propagandized, and made void of common sense reasoning (by design) and they actually believe what they are doing and saying regardless of truth. And if you talk with them, they will angrily tell you they hold the real truth – everything else is a lie.

A bit of A Clockwork Orange going on.

 

Share