August 6, 2020

Day 22 – No Executive Orders

DOG and PONY SHOW

Absolutely nothing posted on White House website about 23 executive orders.

But be vigilant and watch carefully as the lying republicans, presenting themselves as the great protectors of our Second Amendment rights, begin to cave in on gun rights saying they are open to discussion on gun control issues like enhanced background checks. The media is doing their job of convincing the populace that the majority of people want stricter laws that do nothing to prevent violent crime and everything to do with disarming the people.

Remember what I have been saying. The last blockade to avoid total despotic rule is an armed populace. Once that is gone, so are we.

Historically, neither democrat or republican lie makers (not a typo) do as they say as both sides have the same agenda; they are just permitted to use different rhetoric in order to deceive the people.

We all have become victims of the biggest con game in Washington, D.C.: “We must come together in compromise to get something done.” That is progressive speak and has led to the destruction of this nation. But we fail to learn from history……by design.

Share

Day 21 – No Executive Orders

SMOKE and MIRRORS

“Watch the right hand closely,” Obama says. “Because my left hand is doing some remarkable things I don’t want you to know about!” And by the way, nothing posted for executive orders on White House website.

The fake president in the fake photo below calls the guns you use for self and family protection, along with target shooting and sport hunting, “weapons of war.”

obamashooting

Share

Day 20 – No Executive Orders

SONG and DANCE

Now that President Obama has put his campaign machine back in order and taken to the streets to push his Second Amendment destruction, some in the media are backing away from any reference to Obama’s dog and pony show, used to incite violence and further divide the country, of signing 23 executive orders on gun control and confiscation, while exploiting children.

I’m not holding my breath that any orders will ever be published, because I knew the day Obama lied about signing 23 executive orders, he had not written them and there were no details concerning any of the orders. Obama does not want Americans to know about details. If any executive orders are ever published it will be in the cover of darkness. But, the point is he deceived the people, lied to them and using Adolf Hitler-like tactics drove another wedge to divide the people and incite violence; something he has yet to be able to accomplish, with the exception of individuals who have, against many odds, died of late. The latest victim being Chris Kyle.

In the meantime, while Obama and his band of True Believers are working feverishly to disarm Americans, Homeland Security continues to arm itself and are buying and stockpiling assault weapons and ammunition. Why would Homeland Security need to do that? Isn’t defense up to the Department of Defense?

obamashooting

Share

Day 19 – No Executive Orders

DECEIT!

Obama pretended he was signing 23 executive orders, which he wasn’t, and there are no executive orders posted yet, after 19 days, on the official White House website.

Guns have been a part of American culture since the very beginning. The only thing that has changed is social decay.

Share

Say It Ain’t So Joe on Why We Need More Gun Laws

This evidently is true. Read more about it here.

biden

Share

Day Eighteen – No Executive Orders

CHICANERY

Can you believe it? Nothing posted for the public yet!

But you can read one person’s perspective as to why we should in no way support the lies about background checks of any kind, including those proposed for private gun sales.

Share

Newtown School Board Wants More Armed Guards

But why would they do that? Are they not listening to the anti gun advocates who say that adding guns to schools will not make the kids any safer? The School Board is, however, seemingly listening to the parents who say they want access into the school buildings limited and more armed guards on duty at their schools.

We learned today of at least one instance where a shooter at a middle school in Atlanta was thwarted by an armed, on-duty guard.

But here’s the reality. While people may have demands, and in this case perhaps the school board will listen to the demands of the parents and offer some protection within the school, government and the robots that support it, will continue to demand the disarming of the general public. You’ll not find government, generally speaking, pushing back against calls for armed police in schools. The goal of the federal government and probably state governments in at least some cases, is to disarm the people and make sure the only ones with guns are the military and cops. That’s a real threat from tyranny, in case you didn’t know.

Share

Day Seventeen – No Executive Orders

SWINDLE

Nothing posted yet!

But look here! An armed guard on duty at an Atlanta middle school stops shooting.

Share

Day Sixteen – No Executive Orders

Bamboozlement

SHOCK! Nothing posted yet!

With President Obama’s fraudulent act of supposedly signing 23 executive orders to strip you of your right to self protection and protection from tyrants like him, Homeland Security says that if you become a victim of an “active shooting”, grab a pair of scissors and defend yourself. You can’t make this stuff up. Just a tyrannical government and we have one!

Also take notice of what the narrator says in this video of how to be prepared when you call 911. He says to tell the dispatcher, how many shooters, how many weapons and what kind of weapons the shooter is using. Are you kidding me? If a person was close enough to know this, they would be dead. But more importantly, if the victim was close enough AND THEY WERE ALLOWED TO BE ARMED, with something other than a pair of scissors, the shooter would be dead! Brain surgery? I think not.

Share

Why Elevating the Debate on Gun Control is Ceding Rights

Everywhere I go I hear and read the same old malarkey about how gun rights advocates will not “rationally” and “reasonably” join in a national debate to limit access to guns. Those making the demands for such “debate” as they wish to misrepresent their cause, attempt to paint a picture that anyone not wishing to lay down and play dead are “extremist” or “right wing”, along with many other descriptive titles of which I’ll refrain from posting. Gun rights is NOT a left/right issue. Even fascists like Sen. Dianne Feinstein and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg believe in THEIR right to guns for their own protection but seemingly aren’t interested in yours.

From an intelligent perspective, isn’t demanding that others join in THEIR debate on gun control akin to demanding that people sit down and rationally and reasonably debate the need to prohibit the police from entering your home at anytime for any reason just to have a look around? After all, if the police could come into your home anytime, people will be safer – won’t they? Of course the brainwashed masses will immediately say it’s not the same thing. But aren’t they?

Those who say the two are not related do so because they actually believe that because guns exist, mass murders occur. Isn’t that the same as saying that because private homes exist, they are subject to invasion, i.e. robbery, random crime, etc.? And one could further argue that if the people are disarmed, all the more reason cops should invade your home anytime they want because you are not capable of taking care of yourself; just as government wants it.

Most people who advocate for the rights guaranteed in the Second Amendment believe this right is necessary for self protection and the warding off or tyrannical governments, both foreign and domestic and rightfully argue that the presence of guns, no matter the type, is not responsible for mass murders, or killings of any kind.

I’m not attempting to censor the free speech of those seeking bans on guns. It’s disingenuous to demonize people who strongly believe in their right to protection, while at the same time presenting themselves as somehow about the fray because they want to compromise away those rights. This tactic is common throughout all political debate and comes up when one side doesn’t have any fact, truth or data to support the eagerness for dictatorial rule, which is what they are advocating whether they know it or not.

I’m so tired of hearing the ignorance, cultivated through mind manipulation, that comprise is a necessary thing. Compromise is good for things like trying to decide what brand of soda pop to buy for the party but has no place when it comes to the fundamental and inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Before anyone should be talking about further destruction of the Bill of Rights, maybe the “rational” and “reasonable” debate should be about what has happened in our society that ends in things like Sandy Hook.

Guns have been prevalent in the United States at least since the Pilgrims used the blunderbust. Maybe the transformation of a God-fearing, respectful citizenry, founded with a sense of moral duty and responsibility, into a liberal, progressive, decadent, immoral, Sodom and Gomorrah-like culture has something to do with why. Dare we not address that?

Share