October 22, 2019

The Left’s Hatred and Ignorance

It should be obvious, but is not, that the Left hates everything that somebody tells them to hate.

As in the case of the staged Parkland, Florida school shooting, instead of addressing the immoral, decadent, sadistic, nasty, hate-filled, rotten, perverse, lifestyles they so much are in love with, the Left chooses to attack a person’s right, their choice, in how they can defend themselves. It appears with each passing fake attack and with each passing programmed response by the Left (did you catch the “programmed?”) more and more people will need more than ever before the right to keep and bear arms if they so choose.

Their hatred is obvious! Perhaps not so obvious, at least to them anyway, is their ignorance of what they do. This ignorance is not just found in the case of hating on guns and anyone who has or supports owning a gun. The Left and Right (I see and hear it every day) demand that “something is done about that.”

One recent example might be that NFL football players chose to kneel during the playing of the national anthem. Whether you agreed or not shouldn’t matter when it comes to protecting a right. One can argue if the NFL, the teams, or the Players Union had any authority over the players to prohibit such action. Regardless, everywhere I went all I heard was that those caught kneeling should be thrown out of the NFL…or something worse.

I asked one man if that really is what he wanted and in his anger, he answered, “YES!” I attempted to explain that sometimes protecting a right places us in uncomfortable situations and that demanding a person’s right be taken away from them because they did something wrong, will, eventually come back and bite you on the rear end – that is when you discover one day your right to voice or demonstrate your disapproval or approval of something that holds meaning to you is gone. Think before you react, is now void of the American society of brainwashed automatons.

One of the reasons I believe the events at Parkland, Florida were staged is because of how the fallout from the event has taken place so well scripted. It reminds me terribly of the Trayvon Martin sham.

Almost from the first fake news report, demands, real or planned, began calling for an outlawing of any lawmaker or wannabe lawmaker’s right to accept legal money from the NRA. Yes, the anger and hatred is there, all wrapped up in a nice little package as has been planned out, but do any of these people understand what they are asking? I don’t think so!

It is unconstitutional, or at least there are court cases that ruled that it was illegal to punish one group of people more harshly than another. If that holds no meaning to the criers of idiocy, consider the long-term effects of getting such a law passed.

Don’t get me wrong. I think ALL money that flows through political channels should be stopped…completely. As the saying goes, “Power corrupts; Absolute Power corrupts absolutely.” Money equals power and history has proven that when there is money involved there is corruption.

In one’s anger and hatred, especially in this case where it is not guns that are the culprit but the perverted and insane people of this nation and world that have caused people to resolve issues by killing people and sometimes killing masses of people, their programmed response has been to attack guns and all establishments that present themselves as being pro-gun. In this case, we are talking about the NRA.

These insane, emotional zombie-bots, actually are running around telling anyone they see that the NRA is responsible for the deaths of people in Parkland, Florida or anywhere that guns have been used to kill people. They don’t do this for any other kind of action that results in death. Why just guns?

In the Left’s attack on the NRA, they are demanding that nobody is allowed to accept money from the NRA. As I pointed out, so far, this will not stand up in the Courts. But consider for a moment the insanity of the demand. You can’t tell me that most everyone doesn’t have a pet project that they want to be supported with money. What are these same people going to do with there is no funding available for things like fighting cancer, introducing wolves, support of women’s rights, support of equal rights, etc. etc.?

These non-thinking clowns can’t see that their demand opens the door for all entities, whether the NRA or the CBD, WWP, HSUS, PETA, for them to lose any and all support for political purposes.

Such emotions as anger and hate prevent people from thinking rationally. When you combine that with the propagandizing that has gone on for so long now, mixed in with some George Soros money to perpetuate the anger and hatred, and not only will we continue to see the hatred and ignorance on display, it will only get worse.

It’s all quite sad.

And I must finish by adding…

DON’T GO LOOK!

Share

Trump’s “True” Colors Shining Through

There are lyrics to a song that begin this way: “I see your true colors shining through…” True Colors can be good or bad. It appears that we are now beginning to see the “true” colors of Donald Trump and many other “FAKE” Second Amendment supporters according to their anti Second Amendment actions following the staged school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Back in June of 2015, I posted on this website, and took an immense amount of grief from idiotic, blinded, and as a result, fake Second Amendment clowns, that Donald Trump supported a ban on “assault weapons” and that he supported longer waiting periods in which to purchase a gun. Of course, his political game, like a chameleon, changed its colors to become anything necessary to get elected. This is nothing new by politicians because every last one of them is a filthy, rotten, corrupt son-of-a-bitch.

In that posting, I provided a quote by Trump: “I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.”

From my perspective, the insanity that has followed the Parkland, Florida shooting is not about how to make the world we live in safer. It’s about mindlessly duped millions of people doing the bidding for corrupt bastards bent on complete control over everything we do. The brainwashing that has gone on for many years now has rendered a mass of automatonic sheep eager to cut their own throats because they no longer have the ability to think cognitively. It’s the epitome of cognitive dissonance, and what makes this brand of cognitive dissonance so effective for the Global Power Structure that promotes it, is that while they stick bamboo shoots under their fingernails and stand in white-hot coals of fire, they are thoughtless and unaware of what they do, feeling no pain.

But why the guns? Is there any other item that exists in our world that excites such idiotic, emotional behavior that doesn’t involve animals? I don’t think so.

What boils my blood is to watch these people act and react. Essentially, I have stopped watching, reading, and listening to mainstream media. Most of us know it is horseshit but due to our ongoing mind control, we simply continue watching it anyway. It’s some kind of perverse addiction. I stopped because I finally realized how angry it makes me – not the content of lies being heaped upon the masses (mostly because I recognize the lies while most don’t) but because people believe it and react accordingly. That is all part of the plan.

This morning I sat down on the living room sofa and turned on the local news. I actually wanted to catch a weather report because it has been so warm here. Because it is a Florida television station, it was a vibrant display of panic, emotionalism, idiocy, blather, poppycock, and everything that turns your stomach causing uncontrolled wretching. I could, but I couldn’t, believe what I was hearing about a school shooting, guns and the need to do something. As one member of the zombies stated, “We have to do SOMETHING!”

It angers me that people actually believe that banning a special kind of gun, any gun or all guns will stop violence and crime. What an incredible job the propagandists have done! This failure to launch brains is not relegated only to the mentally deranged “Left.” It is shared by most all, but due to the “Right’s” higher ground attitude, and a false belief and understanding that “reasonable” restrictions on a person’s God-given right to choose how best to protect themselves from not only some programmed, deranged, subhuman, troglodyte shooting up a school full of children but just as much from the damned evil bastards operating out of Washington, D.C., that we see a continued “reasonable” assassination of my God-given right to decide for myself how I will protect myself, my property and my family.

But, why the guns? Banning guns won’t stop violent crime from occurring. We have made strict laws to ban illicit drugs and the sale of them. It has done nothing to stop the use of people-killing drugs. The Federal Government declared a “war on drugs.” Has that stopped the use of drugs and the tens of thousands of useless deaths directly and indirectly related to drugs? No! We have made laws that a person can’t use a vehicle to murder people, run them over in a crowd. Has any of that stopped the action? No! We have made it a crime to drive drunk and declare it vehicular manslaughter when a drunk causes another’s death. Has that stopped drunk driving? But, somehow the servitude is trained to believe guns are different in basic human psychology.

I could go on and on but for those beyond hope, nothing I say will get them to understand the ignorance and their lack of thinking. They have been programmed to be this way. We must attack the guns. We must always attack the guns. Sense and sensibility be damned!!! Attack the guns and thusly my right to choose.

Brainwashed, sheep cannot and will not see how political this all is for a purpose far bigger than protecting children in a gun free zone. They won’t address the real problem because it points a finger directly at themselves.

The cries go out to “ban assault weapons” and yet if you ask them what an assault weapon is none could tell you. Why? Because even the lawmakers don’t know. It was designed that way. To some, an “assault weapon” could be a wet noodle. To others, it’s an intercontinental ballistic missile loaded with a nuclear warhead. Not defining what an assault weapon is, provides leeway for criminals in Washington to do as they please, when they please, and how they please. It is how our laws are deliberately written. It’s part of the rigged system.

Here’s an example of such. President Trump is someone most Trump supporters believe is a staunch advocate for the Second Amendment. I have written recently and showed examples of how so-called gun rights advocates think that because Donald Trump is president, gun sales have dropped and people think the threat to disarmament no longer exists.

Trump is not a good advocate of the Second Amendment. The NRA is not a good advocate of the Second Amendment. Most outdoor sportsmen are not good advocates for the Second Amendment.

Are we to believe that Trump so much cares that innocent people are getting shot by deranged people his answer is to send out a “memorandum” and instructs his Attorney General to seek a ban on “assault-type weapons” and a clearer definition of “machinegun?”

But, I thought Trump, the NRA, all the other fake Second Amendment groups, along with sportsmen, substantiate their belief in the right to keep and bear arms by telling the world it’s not the guns that are killing people. If they believe that why do they persist in giving that right of choice away? Why then don’t the go after the real problem? I know why, but do you?

Proverbs 29:18 reads: “Where there is no vision, the people decay…” (some use the word perish instead of decay). I think one can expound on that just a bit without changing the meaning and clarify that if there is the wrong vision, the people will perish too.

Some choose to believe this is the greatest country on earth. Perhaps, but one has to wonder if that belief wouldn’t be dashed a bit if the many masses actually knew the truth of things.

There have been ample opportunities for the right leader to step forward and lead while providing the people the right vision. I understand that because he is nothing more than a puppet, a president cannot lead in the right way and live. The problem, as we have seen in Parkland, Florida isn’t because somebody has failed to define what a machine gun is. It’s because the vision for this country is wrong. Trump has had a chance. Obama had his chances. Bush many times could have worked to right the vision. It goes on and on.

Changing the Second Amendment, limiting my right to choose, any of man’s laws will not change anything. The vision must include addressing the problems of an immoral society, driven by lust, greed, hatred, anger, fear, etc. Our leaders exemplify the wrong vision. The people want so badly to follow, they will do exactly that. The leaders have the wrong vision and it matters not because the people will always follow.

Trump has an opportunity to use his position to begin to address the real problem. But he won’t. He can’t. Instead, with the help of mindless automatons, he will work with those who will diminish my legal rights to self-defense and their work will make the world a more dangerous place to live. Anyone who speaks only of addressing guns and not our decayed society is part of the problem.

People like Trump and those that make the laws that keep us in our places, get to have all the protection their filthy money can buy. And you cannot see how wrong all of this is.

I’m sorry!

Edited on 2/21/2018 at 6:04 p.m.

Share

Gun Violence: Talking About the Truth Behind It

In reading through several news articles following the Parkland, Florida shooting, I found the below examination among those that seem more interested in addressing the real issue of why people are turning to the murder and destruction of people.

“Cross guns off the list of things that changed in thirty years. In 1985, semi-automatic rifles existed, and a semi-automatic rifle was used in Florida. Guns didn’t suddenly decide to visit mayhem on schools. Guns can’t decide.

We can also cross the Second Amendment off the list. It existed for over 200 years before this wickedness unfolded. Nothing changed in the Constitution.

That leaves us with some uncomfortable possibilities remaining. What has changed from thirty years ago when kids could take firearms into school responsibly and today might involve some difficult truths.”<<<Read More>>>

It is certain that other than some technological developments in the manufacture of guns, little has changed. Never in the history of the world has a gun involuntarily gotten up and killed somebody.

However, I’m not so sure one can carte blanche say that the Second Amendment has not changed. I’m not so sure either that one can, and pass a straight-face test, say that what changes have taken place concerning Second Amendment issues have not, to some degree, directly or indirectly had an effect on people dying from gun violence.

The Second Amendment states that the right of the people to keep and bears arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED and yet that is exactly what has happened. As a result, a person’s “right” to self-defense has been limited. One cannot help but ask how many people died because their right to be able to protect themselves AT ALL TIME, has been denied them due to changes in the how the Second Amendment is interpreted.

This should not, however, detract from the truth that much of the reason that murder, violence, sexual abuse, rape, child molestation, drug use, immorality, etc. etc. is all due to a spiraling downward moralistic society.

Let’s talk about that for a change instead of a person’s right to keep and bear arms.

Share

Give Up Second Amendment in Exchange for an “Upgrade” of the First?

You can’t make this stuff up.

I was sent a link to an article at Powerline, where the author made a valiant attempt to inject some semblance of rational discourse into a topic that never experiences anything close to rationality – school shootings.

To prove this point, simply read the comments that follow the article. I’d like to take a moment and address one of them. A commenter writes: “I suggest a trade-off: Conservatives support the deletion of the 2nd amendment in return for an upgraded 1st amendment which restores prayer and Bible reading in the public schools, and makes the graphic depiction of murder on TV, film, the Internet and video games illegal.”

I immediately wondered what world this person must live in. I know where I live and it’s seldom in and of this world but I think my reasoning skills are a tad bit better. Let me explain, even though our existence has driven us to a point where an explanation is actually needed.

This person suggests that “conservatives” support the deletion of the Second Amendment as part of a trade-off. I’m wondering why liberals, who have and will continue to enjoy their Second Amendment right aren’t included in this obvious ignorant attack? I guess I just didn’t know only “conservatives” support the Second Amendment.

Try, if possible, to understand the trade-off. Before I comment further, I hope that it is obvious that this person fails miserably in understanding the First and Second Amendments or even holding any discernment as to the difference between a God-given right, a Government-given privilege, and the freedom to make choices according to your morals and/or ideology.

The commenter suggests an “upgrade” to the First Amendment in exchange for a repeal of the Second Amendment. It is unbelievable, to the unlearned I suppose, that a person views a reduction in their rights as an upgrade. Once upon a time a right, in the context of the Bill of Rights, was constructed with the idea that a person was free to exercise that right while at the same time not infringing on the choices of others in exercising any right or choosing not to. The comment above surely delineates a lost understanding of something so basic.

For those in need, here is the First Amendment as it is written: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The “upgrade” is said to include: “…restores prayer and Bible reading in the public schools, and makes the graphic depiction of murder on TV, film, the Internet and video games illegal.”

For clarification, we the people and We The People, have butchered the First Amendment but not nearly to the extent of the Second. However, people mostly have the right to pray or read the Bible any place and at any time they so CHOOSE. I have yet to find written in the Bible where Yahweh says that prayer must be done openly in a public arena, in a formal and structurally organized way and included in the curriculum of public schools. In other words, because Government dictates that praying and Bible reading are not part of the public school curriculum, any student, for the most part, and while not disturbing others in their quest for an education, can pray or read their Bible if they so CHOOSE. I’ve never understood those that think they are denied their “right” to their established “religion” because prayer and Bible reading are not “REQUIRED.”

As much as what movies, music, video games, Internet, and all is a reflection of the decadent and immoral American society as a whole, last time I checked, a parent has a right to control what their children are allowed to see and listen to. Parents fail miserably in this but is that a good enough reason to pretend that making this crap illegal, in other words destroying another right of a person to CHOOSE, the right answer? Is that why the person called this an “upgrade.” Up is down, down is up…etc.

Supposedly, once we become “of age” we can CHOOSE to see and hear what we wish. As the Scriptures say: Bring up a child in the way in which he/she should go and he/she shall never depart from it. As much as some would desire, it is still quite difficult to control what a person thinks…short of lobotimization.

I would suppose that in this person’s mind, their “upgrade” was some kind of carrot at the end of a stick. It doesn’t work that way. Rights are about CHOICE not about being forced to have to abide by someone’s ideology, including governments’.

The Second Amendment doesn’t force people to pick up a gun and use it. The Second Amendment is about giving any lawful citizen of this country the option to do that if they CHOOSE. If I believe that Government is a serious threat to my existence, as well as my freedom to make choices, anyone mandating to me that the only gun I can own is a single shot .22 caliber rifle, isn’t allowing me full exercise of my right to self defense and/or the threat of tyranny.

What another commenter said was that there would be no First Amendment if the Second Amendment (or the principle on which it was founded) did not exist.

What man-governments have done to the Second Amendment, masked behind comments like, “reasonable controls,” is to continue to limit and restrict the choices of people in how they can defend themselves. Gun Free Zones outlaw freedom of choice. People who get shot and killed in a Gun Free Zone are the responsibility of every government and individual who demands and has been successful in taking away my freedom to choose how and where I can defend myself. Someday, you will have to answer for your totalitarian behavior, but for now, you will have to live with the reality of what you have done. There is blood on your hands.

Sleep well tonight, my pretty!

Share

Putin Colluded With James Madison Pushing 2A So Americans Would Kill Themselves

My two major themes over the past several weeks has been, 1.) The world has gone insane, and, 2.) We’re all gonna die.

Here is more proof of my assessment of things.

Share

A Severe Case of Ignopidity

Ignopidity: An incurable affliction of being both ignorant and stupid and not knowing the difference.

Share

Yes, It Is Gun Control. Picking The Rope That Will Hang You

Recently the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act and “FixNICS”. When I first wrote about this, my comment was that the supposed gun rights advocates, like the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) and the National Rifle Association (NRA), were claiming a big victory.

The Senior Vice President and General Counsel for the National Shooting Sports Foundation shows us just how these types think who want to limit your right to keep and bear arms by saying they are not doing that. “…And, despite what some have falsely claimed, it [H.R. 38] will do so while not interfering with the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans.

“The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) was established 17 years ago with Congressional passage of the Brady Act. Today, it is generally not known that the instant criminal background check system itself was the recommendation of the firearms industry, long before there was a Brady Act. The operating principle then and now is to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens — and the lawful commerce in firearms — while denying access to firearms by those prohibited by current law from purchasing or possessing guns.”

I have pointed out before the hypocrisy of those who eagerly rave that making laws to restrict gun ownership only punishes law-abiding people, and yet, a group such as the NSSF wants to sell us on the idea that THEIR “FixNCIS” is “is not a ‘gun control’ measure” and somehow will only affect criminals and the mentally ill.

In addition, the General Counsel believes that simply because a gun control law has existed for 17 years, with age it loses its label as gun control. He also points out that it was the gun industry that introduced background check gun rights limitations. Again, I ask, just because a part-time Second Amendment supporter creates a law limiting the inalienable rights of a person to keep and bear arms and to protect themselves, their families and their property, it is not gun control?

I get sick and tired of the fake gun rights people laying claim that nobody in America wants criminals and the mentally ill to be able to buy guns and their willingness to give up their rights thinking this will accomplish that. When the narrative fits, these clowns state that no laws will keep a criminal from getting possession of a gun. They then turn around a promote legislation that they are trying to promote as one that will keep criminals from getting a gun. This makes absolutely no sense. Somehow there must be money in this, but from whom?

And then there’s the “mentally ill” side of this fascist law that nobody seems to want to talk about. It’s so tidy and clean how NSSF presents this: “…to ensure that the system has all the appropriate disqualifying criminal and adjudicated mental health records put into it. We have been successful through our direct efforts with 16 state legislatures to pass reforms to ensure that there are no statutory, regulatory, administrative or procedural impediments to entering all appropriate records into NICS.”

Did you get that? “…to ensure that there are no statutory, regulatory, administrative or procedural IMPEDIMENTS…” (emphasis added)

Are we supposed to rest comfortably in the fact that any “mentally ill” person has been “adjudicated” before they can be cast into the fascist, firey pit of government hell? We are subjects of a very corrupt manmade government. Evidently, despite all that the citizen-subjects have been exposed to, especially in recent years, we are going to allow these pagan sodomites make an “adjudicated” decision on who is mentally ill and who is not? Are you serious?

When we have “ensure[d] that the system has all the” names of anyone deemed by Satan himself to be mentally unfit to own or buy a gun, we have successfully hung ourselves and we picked out the rope we want to do it with. How can we be so ignorant and willfully blind?

The Second Amendment is very simple. Men and their fascist government and totalitarian, brainwashed citizens have bastardized the inalienable right and turned it into something it was never intended to be. That’s what men do. Government doesn’t want you or me to have inalienable rights. They want to be the giver of any kind of right in order that they can withdraw it at any time. This act is made that much easier. Organizations like the NSSF do the bidding for the fascists.

As the old saying goes, you can put lipstick on a pig but it’s still a pig. Don’t be fooled by fancy words from lawyers that the new rope that is going to hang you won’t hurt a bit.

Share

Stop the Bus and Let Me Off

Share

House Votes to Reduce Your Inalienable Rights

Yesterday the U.S. House of Representatives voted and passed H.R. 38, by a vote of 231-198. All the usual suspects, i.e. NRA, NSSF, etc., are claiming a great victory. Stupid is as stupid does.

H.R. 38 is commonly known as the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017. What isn’t known by most people is that in order to get the bill to the House floor, it had to contain the “Fix NICS” portion designed, we are told, to improve the criminal background check system.

So what does all of this do?

First, let’s look at the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 (CCRA). Most fail to understand that it should be an unquestioned (inalienable: unquestioned, unable to be taken away) right of any man to defend himself, and yet today’s American society does everything that it can to hand that inalienable right over to the power and control of Government. It makes little sense to me.

With this fact in mind, why is it that Americans are required by Government to be taxed on a piece of paper that grants them a privilege to own or conceal-carry a gun? We must also ask, that if it is an unquestioned right to self-defense, why can’t we cross state lines legally carrying a concealed or any weapon at all?

In addition, ignorants who think they are fighting for Second Amendment rights, are some of the first to stand up and make a lot of noise about state sovereignty. When it fits their narrative, in their minds the states have the right, as found in the Tenth Amendment (The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.) to control their own fates in ways “NOT DELEGATED TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE CONSTITUTION.” And so, by pushing Congress to pass a reciprocity act, they have now delegated the United States to control concealed carry, and the states have now lost some of their sovereignty in deciding how it wants to regulate guns.

With Congress now in control, a group of fascist crooks who would sell their soul to Satan to continue their quest for being pagan sodomites, can alter and take away their GRANTED, which you gave them, privilege with the drop of a hat. LOVING SERVITUDE!

True Second Amendment supporters, not those who think the NRA is their gun rights gOD, would be pushing to make all states “Constitutional Carry,” (poor choice of a label) i.e. man does not need a writ of privilege from any government to protect himself at all times. Which brings us to an interesting part of this new bill.

Some states have always had or recently enacted, laws that strip away the requirement for a permit to carry a gun, concealed or otherwise. With the passage of H.R. 38, where each state is to recognize the piece of paper issued for concealed carry, what does that mean for the constitutional carry person coming and going across state lines?

Read what “qualifies” someone to participate in the Government’s new privilege: “A qualified individual must: (1) be eligible to possess, transport, or receive a firearm under federal law; (2) carry a valid photo identification document; and (3) carry a valid concealed carry permit issued by, or be eligible to carry a concealed firearm in, his or her state of residence.

Constitutional carry assumes a person has a “privilege” to own, receive or transport a gun. There are already laws to deal with that. To qualify, that same person must have a valid photo identification document, a Government instrument, and “carry a valid concealed carry permit” issued in their state. Oops! According to the NRA and others, those who believe in the alienable right to keep and bear arms, just got punished. Whose side is who on anyway?

Seems that Constitutional Carry just got knocked down a peg or six and anyone wishing to be protected when they cross state lines must comply with fascist Big Brother.

So, you ignoramuses keep on turning everything you have over to the control of the Federal Government and soon you’ll have nothing. Follow the corrupt NRA, who is NOT the friend of Second Amendment people. They are the friends of making money and, like Government, will sell you down the river for a buck.

Secondly, it was basically the “Left” who insisted that “Fix NICS” be part of the bill or no deal. Many of the same people who think reciprocity was a good thing, also believe that a background check stops crime. In proclaiming victory, the NRA stated: “All Americans, including law-abiding gun owners, agree that violent criminals should not have legal access to firearms.” These are the same ones who stand and shout that gun laws only harm the lawful citizen, prohibiting them to self-defense, and yet they push something as stupid as a law they now claim will stop criminals.

Any “improvements” to the criminal background check system results in nothing more than more government control, which, it appears, Americans are falling in love with, and a further destruction of a person’s inalienable right to protect and defend themselves at all times.

We’re killing ourselves and loving it!

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share

Embellishing a Fake Problem With Gun Purchase Background Check System

I wondered how long it would take before idiots would begin placing demands on “improving” the criminal background check system.

Here we go.

First, understand, if you are willing and able, that the Texas church shooting may have been a staged event, part of its purpose to draw attention to background checks…another prohibitive measure for a person to keep and bear arms. The press lies….constantly, and are 100% controlled by the government and other powers who want guns taken out of the hands of every American.

The Texas shooting, we are told, included a “failed” background check that allowed the shooter to illegally purchase a gun because he was a convicted felon.

The calls are going out demanding stricter controls and tighter background checks, even from those fake “conservatives” who lie to you every day, but you refuse to see it.

In a USA Today article, we read: “The FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) vets millions of gun purchase transactions every year. But the thousands of gun seizure requests highlight persistent problems in a system where analysts must complete background checks within three days of the proposed purchase. If the background check is not complete within the 72-hour time limit, federal law allows the sale to go forward. ATF agents are asked to take back the guns if the FBI later finds these sales should have been denied. “

In addition supposedly certain “agents” are fearful of having to go out and retrieve guns from some 4,000 gun purchasers where it was later found out a background check failed.

“In addition to the public safety risks, the ATF agents tasked with retrieving the banned weapons from unauthorized gun owners across the country are exposed to potentially dangerous confrontations.”

However, this is not the first time agents have had to go retrieve guns. In addition, the ATF refuses to disclose if there were any problems getting the guns back, which makes an honest person ask if it’s so dangerous why aren’t they telling us all about the shootouts they’ve had getting the guns back? (wink-wink)

“The ATF declined to provide information on the 4,170 gun purchases the FBI referred for seizure last year.”

One way or another, these fascists are determined to get our guns and prevent or limit the sale of guns in any way they can. The hype over the background check system is but one more way to further add restrictions to an already meaningless activity that produces no good results, costs the taxpayers billions of dollars, and restricts the right to keep and bear arms by government force through regulation.

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share